Since when do tornados exhibit surgical precision pertaining to items that are vacuumed aloft?
Again, nobody said it did, this is pure speculation. The report was poor and without much detail and only 1 image of some fish in a bucket.
As all this pertains to the OP, HOW does a LIVING CREATURE (a fish), minding it's own business in a billabong in northern Australia, manage to
get surreptitiously vacuumed up through this poorly-understood fiery physical phenomenon known as a tornado, get held in aquatic suspended animation
for 2 days up in the clouds, and then be ejected from the sky, like a meteor, and arrive ALIVE back at ground level?
Again you speculate and embroider, you write your own 'facts'.
First off, the report itself said no tiornados were reported. note that the area is relatively remote.
Therefor we cant speculate on how strong it was, or was not, let alone if it was 'firey' as you so dramatically embellish it.
Further more, its more speculation that fish were
held in aquatic suspended animation for 2 days up in the clouds, and then be ejected from the sky, like a meteor,
and arrive ALIVE back at ground level?
C'mon, thats laughable, you sound like Barnum the circus guy.
Fact: It happened on two consecutive days. This does not mean fish were held in the sky etc etc, infact honesty and common sense ,
a knowledge of gravity should tell you otherwise.
Does it not seem much more likely that another spout developed over the same area or a nearby waterhole AGAIN the following day?
Your wording and intent to convey the mysterious is obvious and embarressing.
For the third time, you have ignored my suggested explanations and not responded,or acknowledged the possibility that the explanation is indeed boring
instead embellishing your ideas further each post you make!
You are a showman to be sure! You could convince folk to pay to see a rare two headed rabbit, born with only one head!
Not to piss in your shoe, mate, but common explanations are a dime-a-dozen, easily picked up and pitched away, right
and does not occure to you that statistically, there may be good reason for that. I say bunkum way out theorys are a dime a dozen too mate, especially
on this board.
I think your avatar is self explanitory.
[edit on 1-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]