It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Dunblane killer Thomas Hamilton might have been stripped of his firearms licence had prosecutors heeded police reports about his worrying behaviour towards children, according to secret files.
These include claims that police were tipped off that Hamilton was armed and en route to Dunblane Primary School, that he was a Freemason and received favours from Masons in the police allowing him to avoid prosecution, and that he was part of a paedophile ring that included members of the security forces. Lord Cullen on completing the public inquiry into the murders of 16 children and their teacher, ordered the documents in the case sealed for an extraordinary 100 years. Even the major media in Scotland thought this smelled funny. What was being hidden?
The report banned under the 100-year rule was com piled by Paul Hughes, then a detective sergeant with Central Scotland police, and concerns Thomas Hamilton's activities at a summer camp in Loch Lomond in 1991, five years before the shootings. Selected extracts published during the Cullen inquiry revealed that it recommended Hamilton should be prosecuted for his activities at the summer camp and that he should have his gun licence revoked. The report, however, was ignored.
In October 2004, former conservative party chairman Lord Tebbit added his voice to the growing outrage at this decision, and in October 2005 half of the files were opened. Press reports suggested that the papers showed Hamilton be a paranoid obsessive, much given to writing letters of complaint to all and sundry; a paedophile ring has not been found.
Originally posted by TailoredVagabond
What utter rubbish!!!
I'm not a fan of Gordon Brown but EVEYRTHING about this is baseless and wrong.
Sick, sick Tory propaganda, peddled on by idiots who 1) don't understand anything, at all and 2) have NOTHGING better to do.
Originally posted by multichild
reply to post by SmokeJaguar67
Does all the above then make him a Paedophile?
Originally posted by multichildIts one thing to be what you say, which is heartless, selfish and repugnant, but to be called a Paedophile is wrong.
Originally posted by multichildLike I said, he got his own opinions and ideas on hoe the world and the Uk should be run, but in no way what so ever would I call somebody a Paedophile and stand by it, until I had 100% proof he was!
Originally posted by multichildPoliticians are a bread in themselves, they doing whats good for themselves, its a harsh world and when your in front of the camera being labelled, pidgeon hold, ridiculed it cant be nice, and you may become a little thick skinned and if thats the way you are very determined.
Originally posted by multichildBut he aint a paedophile!
Originally posted by TailoredVagabond
What utter rubbish!!!
I'm not a fan of Gordon Brown but EVEYRTHING about this is baseless and wrong.
Sick, sick Tory propaganda, peddled on by idiots who 1) don't understand anything, at all and 2) have NOTHGING better to do.
Originally posted by multichild
I just came to this post and in honesty its way beyond anything i have read on here before.
To say Gordon Brown is a paedophile is very disturbing, sometimes the truth does hurt and in many cases on here you find some interesting conclusions, but this in my opinion is disgusting.
He is obviously a family man, he recently lost a child too, and I do not believe this thread at all.
I really hope this doesn't slip into main stream TV as somebody is going to be in a whole world of # if it does.
He probably agrees with the NWO agenda, he maybe a Mason but I would never put him down as anything but a decent family man, with his own opinions on how the country and world should run. If we don't like his opinions you dont vote for him, simple as that.
Terrible.
[edit on 1/3/10 by multichild]