This will be one of those threads that the debunkers don't have anything to debunk, so it will probably remain silent. The evidence is damning and NIST is caught in a deliberate lie or coverup and there's not a single thing that debunkers can say to debunk that!

yes, then debunkers/trusters will come with their silly childish rants they will say we are terrorists,liberals,extremists,ron paul nutters and say boeings are made of steel and jet fuel can melt steel . tomorrow , who
knows that trusters may say that al qaida terrorists made a special
variety of jet fuel , that has more energy than nukes in their caves, with allah's supernatural powers

man , those 'debunkers' make me laugh .

[edit on 28-2-2010 by sadchild01]

[edit on 28-2-2010 by sadchild01]

NIST (Shyam Sunder) also said before it released its final WTC7 report that it would be impossible for a building to accelerate into itself at the rate of gravity due to fires. Then not long after that they came out with their measurement that WTC7 actually did accelerate at the rate of gravity. Did they then change their theory accordingly, to investigate for some other cause? No, of course not. They just sandwiched it between two slightly slower "stages," came up with some misleading numbers using the non-linear theoretical acceleration curve and pretended it didn't mean anything anymore.

They simply ignored the fact that people DID hear and even RECORD explosions coming from WTC7, to say that if there was such a blast, it would have been as loud as a jackhammer (for a split second) and so since they never looked for any witnesses who heard the explosions, then they must not have existed. Of course. Even though WE know they DID, because we have the internet (gasp) and can look up both the witness accounts and the recordings in seconds, even if we have never seen them before. Maybe this is why senator Rockefeller is saying the internet is the biggest threat to national security today huh?

The silence from the debunkers is becoming deafening!

Originally posted by seethelight
So if the Truther movement is wrong about one thing, how can we trust anything you guys say? Great logic, applied to your movement's many mistakes.

There is a big difference between honesty and dishonesty and you're being dishonest here.

There is also a big difference between making mistakes and purposely lying. The truth movement may have been wrong about a few things, but that is due to honest errors or mistakes.

NIST either blatantly lied to cover up damning evidence or is willfully incompetent about the molten steel at the WTC. If you blatantly lie or are willfully incompetent about one thing, you lose credibility about everything else. Therefore:

Originally posted by seethelight
How many of you have read any of this?:
www.nist.gov...

That can't be trusted anymore after the above facts have been uncovered.

Originally posted by seethelight
Name another building like WTC7 that has been allowed to burn for over 6 hours without attempts to put out the fire.

Is allowing a building to burn for over 20 hours without attempts to put out the fire good enough for you?








As you can see, although some of the weaker outer steel columns did fail, the building still stood tall and strong, even with a heavy crane still sitting on top. Oh, and you never saw this kind of inferno at the WTC in any of the 3 buildings, let alone for 20 hours as compared to the measly 56 minutes for the south tower.

NIST is a federal agency their continued existence is based on keeping the Feds happy so of course they would bend over backwards in order to maintain the OS storyline that 11% increase in funding sure did not hurt them either.