*video* Mysterious Deaths of 911 Witnesses (MUST SEE), page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 153 times


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 01:35 AM by aristocrat2
If they are eliminating people, they will eliminate the ones most potentially dangerous first, hence those who are dead give heavy indication of where the truth is burried.

The video, incidentally, does not mention the all-important witnesses who actually died DURING 9/11, including...

- Key directors of Raytheon
- John O'Niel

A curious one is the death of Whersley. For him to be one of the first witnesses to be eliminated indicates again support for my thoughts that I have widely posted here before.
One of the ways that they Truth Movement is going wrong is that it is making several assumptins that, whilst they seem reasonable, actually are baseld on no facts at all. The key baseless assumptions that I disagree with are these:-

1. That the people who did this were traitors and yet were patriotic enough only to use all-American kit.
2. That only the US military had the kit to do 9/11
3. That "everyone in Government" was involved rather than the possibility that it could have been done with the involvement of very few US officials.
4. That either the scrambling of US fighters and for them to have been sent to Whiskey 386 in the middle of the Atlantic could only have been an accident or a deliberate act to get them out the way rather than considering the frightening possibilty, that Whersley had actually CORRECTLY identified where the attack on the USA had come form.
5. That it had to have been either ALL PLANES or ALL MISSILES.

None of these assumptions make sense and the need to kill off Whersley backs this up. Likewise, assumption #2 ensures that the Truth Movement looks elsewhere whilst the actual witnesses can be eliminated without anyone ever noticing elsewhere.


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 01:38 AM by hoghead cheese
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
Uh-oh Lucy...Me thinks somebody gots some 'splainin' to do...

But we KNOW these are ALL just coincidences, eh? And all of these witnesses were liars anyway, right?

*end sarcasm*

Another one of these things that gotta at least make one raise an eyebrow IMHO....




www.youtube.com...




Very interesting, I've always said that the day of the attack is a day that the govt. doesn't want dug up again. Those people have been living in fear for a long time just because they where in the wrong place at the wrong time. Can you imagine that while you are looking at the pentagon an explosion happens but when you see the news it says a plane crashed into it. You will get a cold place in your gut, because you have witnessed something that you shouldn't have seen. There's know rules for stuff like this, not official. You have two choices look around and see if anybody saw you and walk away and whistle in the graveyard. Or come out and tell what you saw.

I knew that the Palfrey chick was murdered for the simple fact that this woman has been running a prostitution ring on both coasts but in washington for at least 15 years. If you or me called her and asked for a girl, were nobody and wouldn't get a second glance. We would just get logged in as chuck or joe at hotel blahh. But if Dick Cheney of haliburton or politicians or whomever are using your services, you will log that stuff down and the times and the dates in order to have something as protection from being prosecuted (hell she may have had a prosecutor or two in her book). She's been in the game for a long time and know the rules, and that is I won't rat out the johns if you don't prosecute me and let me off on probation. Even if she would have gotten prosecuted, she still had black gold in that black book. She was looking at 4 to 7 years, but she was looking at at least that much in millions and more to rat out the names of all the powerful people.

It seems like suicide, airplane crashes and weird accidents are the norm (how the hell do you crush yourself with our car like the way they said, unless you had help). You see if Palfrey or the others where chased down by one or two people and gunned down, then it would pull the rag off the bush and point to targeted assassinations of people. So accidents are the norm.


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 04:34 AM by ANOK
Originally posted by manmental
My main issue with 911 being an inside job is the stance and comments from Al Qaeda... who would surely say if:
a) they didn't do it. Blaming Bush for genocide would be the ultimate propaganda.
b) if they had American involvement... "we fooled your own people to destroy the towers...etc"... that admission, with evidence, would easily destroy a Government and create social unrest in USA


Well if that is your 'main issue' then let me help you overcome it, and not from internet links but real life experience.

The Muslims I know want to believe it was terrorists, not because they don't believe it could have been an inside job, but because they want to believe they gave America, the great Satan, a black eye.
Blaming Bush would not be their 'ultimate propaganda', it would be a let down. More like, Terrorist, 'Oh well I was hoping it was us, not surprised though, fire really can't bring buildings down, gotta support the side though, go Al Qaeda woo hoo!'

Your assumption of how they would react is based on what? So now you have a different point of view, and one from reality not google, you will joining the 'truthers' now?...

Edit: Oh BTW the Muslims I know are not terrorists, my terrorist quote was typed with tongue firmly in cheek to make a simple, mildly humorous, point. Just thought I'd make that clear for the er Bureau or other interested parties... I'm in trouble now, shut up just keep grinning

[edit on 2/28/2010 by ANOK]


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 08:26 AM by MaxBlack
While many of the deaths identified in the video clearly either witnessed something or had come to their own conclusion that 911 was not an act of terrorism committed by terrorist in caves from Afghanistan.

Something that should not be ignored in this ongoing saga of dead witnesses is the possibility that secret time travel technology is being abused in a criminal fashion to determine if the witnesses of the present will indeed pose a threat to the 911 investigation in the future.

This claim comes from a federal witness Andrew D. Basiago that discusses secret time travel technology that is being used to commit time crimes and to ensure that those that are guilty are never threatened by exposure coming from some witness that comes forth and gives pertinent testimony to undermine the official 911 story.

Once a determination is made that these present day witnesses will contribute to undermining the official story in the future, those that seek to keep their evil actions secret from anyone and everyone move in the present to eliminate the witnesses that they know for certain will contribute to undermining the official deception of 911 in the future.

While I do not believe that all of the deaths are committed by time travel agents intent on killing meaningful witnesses, I do believe that among the dead there are those that were targeted by those that are currently abusing time travel technology to see the future events critical to those involved in 911 and then act to eliminate the known witnesses of the future in the present. Since the present is the past to the future, in affect we have have a time crime being committed in the past to affect the contrived future outcome.

Whether these witnesses were killed for what they saw or knew, it does beg the question that if you knew some witness was going to be affective in giving testimony in the future, would not those that possess such technology not willingly and eagerly use it to protect themselves and their fellow partners in crime?

Yes, I believe that those with such secret technology would not hesitate once moment to use the secret technology to protect their self interests. Even if that means having to kill a few more people than just those killed on the fateful day of 911, they will kill whatever threatens them and as such, these deaths are not the last to be victim to such attempts to silence those that witnessed first hand the events of 911.

This posting is just food for thought, but in the realm of conspiracies, it is becoming a more and probable to think outside of the box. It could be why so many committed suicide or had convenient accidents that ended their lives before anyone could get official statements from those killed for what they saw or knew of regarding 911.

Could the Cheney assassination team that was created during the Bush regime been a kill team to kill those that threaten the official story of 911? We may never know as long as such secret technology is in the hands of criminals but all those that are involved in the 911 crime understand what it would mean to allow witnesses to live and give testimony to facts they witnessed or had personally been involved in during the 911 event itself.

To the 911 criminals, anyone that has evidence to counter the official story is a target and we better get that point if we get nothing more.


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 09:10 AM by KeepWatchingThem
reply to post by animated



DICK CHENEY'S OWN WORDS NOW CAST DOUBT ON THE OFFICIAL STORY

Dick Cheney made a reference back on Sunday February 14, 2010 to the attack on the Pentagon on 9/11 and put it this way: "and then looking at 9/11 and saying, "This is not a criminal act," not when you destroy 16 acres of Manhattan, kill 3,000 Americans, blow a big hole in the Pentagon. That's an act of war."

His interview with Johnathan Karl on ABC's This Week program was probably a Freudian slip, as he described the Pentagon as being blown up, instead of hit by an airplane. Did he get sloppy with his language and reveal more that he wanted to? There is so little evidence of a plane at the Pentagon, that the damage looked more like an explosion. If the Pentagon was blown up, it had to be an inside job! How come NORAD was unable to send up an interceptor, when they could see the plane coming from 30 miles out, unless Cheney wanted it to get through! Now, more witnesses with information that contradicts the official story DIE! Dick Cheney's plan continues to unfold.

The interview is at the following link and his word slip is at 1:48 min.
abcnews.go.com...

The transcript is at the following link:
abcnews.go.com...


reply posted on 28-2-2010 @ 09:11 AM by daddio
reply to post by manmental



You do know that Al Queda was and IS a CIA front group right. The CIA created them to serve a purpose, it may have been multi-fold too. As they are using that tewrm a lot lately, Have you ever met anyone from Al Queda? Have you ever seen or heard of someone who met someone from Al Queda? So you "believe" what the MSM tells you and you "believe" the videos presented on television? THIS and this alone is the problem with everyone's way of thinking.

Did no one pay attention to the Dominican Republic, flight 587, that crashed into the Rockaway section of Queens? This is where most of the firefighters WHO TALKED, lived. TPTB were sending a very clear message. Shut the hell up or we can do much worse to you and your families. It was November 11 2001, what a coincidence, it was on the 11th just 2 months after TPTB/Israel's first attack on New York and America. They care not who they kill or how. Just like all the witnesses in Dallas at the JFK assassination are all dead too, even the children who would be middle aged right now, but have been suicided by TPTB.

archives.cnn.com...


What a country.

[edit on 28-2-2010 by daddio]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 5 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags