It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by seethelight
Sorry, but there's plenty of people that say they saw molten steel without knowing WHICH metal it was.
Sorry if you're youtube video isn't proof to me,
Um, they show the actual pieces of molten steel. If the actual pieces along with the witness testimony isn't enough for you, then the only other conclusion that can be drawn is that you're either too blinded by denial or you're just here to troll regardless of evidence.
Originally posted by seethelight
The thing is though, that even if there were some molten steel, it doesn't mean anything.
This right here shows your level of intelligence. Molten steel does absolutely mean something. It means there was some other form of incendiary/accelerant in those buildings because jet fuel, aka kerosene, and normal office fires cannot melt steel, period.
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by SquirrelNutz
Here's why my argument is valid.
People claim that a specific number, 1000, engineers, is meaningful.
They trumpet this number all over the internet.
They even hold a press conference to celebrate the meaningfulness of this number.
However, this number doesn't exist in a vacuum. This number is absolutely relative to the whole number of the group.
...
This is a FRINGE movement, within the engineering community.
That is plain to see.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I can agree the hologram theory is a bit far fetched, but the pod theory is not. It makes perfect sense to mount a remote control pod beneath a plane's belly
Yeah, it doesn't matter what "makes perfect sense". What matters is what actually happened.
Fake disinfo "pods" debunked:
www.questionsquestions.net...
It's funny you say that because:
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by technical difficulties
snort.
That's completely ridiculous and not based on anything but some wishful thinking.
So, how'd they figure out how much explosives to use?
what would they have done if a plane missed?
Why did no one report the timed explosions necessary for a demo to work?
Why would you just make stuff up you have no proof of?
Originally posted by seethelight
Russia Today is NOT a credible source.
So 1/10th of 1% of the worlds engineers think 9/11 was a demo, that isn't actually very impressive.
Statistically, that means NO engineers do, because most surveys/studies have a margin of error of AT LEAST 1%.
So less than a 10th of that is meaningless.
Russia Today = Fail
Statistically insignificant number of engineers = fail
And on and on...
Originally posted by technical difficulties
I'm pretty sure that when you have a giant plane crash into a skyscraper at high speeds, they're probably not going to need as much explosives to bring it down as would for a standard demolition. However, I could be wrong, so if there are any experts on this sort of thing viewing this thread, feel free to tell me.
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by SquirrelNutz
Here's why my argument is valid.
People claim that a specific number, 1000, engineers, is meaningful.
They trumpet this number all over the internet.
They even hold a press conference to celebrate the meaningfulness of this number.
However, this number doesn't exist in a vacuum. This number is absolutely relative to the whole number of the group.
...
This is a FRINGE movement, within the engineering community.
That is plain to see.
You are very much in Denial. There are 1,000 people putting time, energy, and their REPUTATIONS on the line -- and that is no small thing, when not having healthcare and a job can kill you in the USA, and getting blacklisted can definitely happen.
As others have pointed out, there are not a 1,000 engineers signing YOUR BUSH CONSPIRACY THEORY and using the "new Physics" books you've been cribbing from.
Touting 1,000 engineers, is ONLY to show that there are people with jobs, willing to put it all on the line. That is pretty dang significant. The number of engineers, does NOT however, make their questions any more or less well thought out. But other engineers can refute them with MATH AND MODELS that are reproducible.
They have not. Even though Popular Mechanics came up with an article, that COULD possibly explain the Government Theory -- there is no actual, model showing the physics and engineering that MAKE it possible -- it's an opinion piece. I wrote a 25 page opinion that they were full of hot air -- so there -- it's EQUIVALENT, right?
If we want to go with the number of subscribers to Popular Mechanics, over MY Opinion -- then of course, the National Enquirer wins.
>> You've come up with no Science to refute their soundly-based QUESTIONS like how does a FALLING BUILDING project tones of steel and bury it in other buildings over 600 feet away? And your point about the number of people on the planet with Engineering Degrees who don't work for George Bush, not saying a dang thing one way or the other concerning 9/11, is another, intellectually dishonest comparison.
Try again. I'm sure someone with a college degree can give us more compelling reasons why we should not investigate the very, very corrupt Bush Administration.
Originally posted by Brian1709
so let's say the truth of 9/11 comes out. what then? the us government says yes we were involved were sorry and yadayadayada. some will go to jail some are too high up to even have their names mentioned. the next day people will go back to their starbucks and facebook.
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by _BoneZ_
You only deal in facts and yet you call 1/10th of 1% of engineers, the majority.
And the organization you've put your faith in also believing in mind control.
Do you believe in mind control?
Wouldn't that be closer to holographic planes than hard fact?
And didn't publicly state that anyone who believed in weird stuff like that wasn't a real truther?
So the head of the organization that you're pimping isn't a real truther?
Ever hear of cognitive dissonance?
Or maybe you're more of a doublethink kinda guy.
Originally posted by Mumbotron
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by _BoneZ_
You only deal in facts and yet you call 1/10th of 1% of engineers, the majority.
You still haven't answered my question: How many structural engineers can you find that agree with the official story? (Again, feel free to express that as a percentage of all of the structural engineers in the world)
Originally posted by SPreston
Originally posted by Mumbotron
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by _BoneZ_
You only deal in facts and yet you call 1/10th of 1% of engineers, the majority.
You still haven't answered my question: How many structural engineers can you find that agree with the official story? (Again, feel free to express that as a percentage of all of the structural engineers in the world)
Right now, I doubt if seethelight and ImAPepper could even get any of the NIST charlatans and frauds to sign on to their Architects and Engineers Against 9/11 Truth let alone send any lucrative donations.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3abd8190fbe1.jpg[/atsimg]