posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:27 AM
Okay, now … slowly, we are getting somewhere. You’re a scientist.
First, – I never called you names. Your insult towards me was uncalled for and entirely not in following the decorum of ATS.
Troll? Okay, so I’m not very tall. I’ll admit to that. Curse of the vertically-impaired Italians – Not historically renown for basketball.
I can assure you, however, the Lord made up for that deficit many fold in intellect.
Now, before you start allowing your elevating blood pressure to overrule your last modicum of courtesy I will tell you the following will be critical
of you.. Hey, ATS. You post, you risk criticism. Brace yourself.
I would say that a man of science would have learned to temper any confrontational, ill-mannered tendencies. But, looking back at this thread … you
have been admonished no less than 7 times within only 6 pages by the Mods for manners and decorum, or lack there of.
You’ve been here for a couple of years. It would be unrealistic to think that we all (the members) would click on a thread with a headline starting
with “WARNING”. All in caps. Which you know the ATS guidelines suggest we avoid doing. Obviously, you wanted to get attention, I’m sure you’ll
concede to that. Then, upon reading of your exclusive knowledge and ability at prediction, we post serious questions in reply. Again, you know this
site. Anyone who puts it out there and says,” You can’t do what I can do - naw, na, na, naw, na!” is asking to get blasted with scrutiny. Think
about it. C’mon … ATS? … Deny Ignorance? … Question Everything? … right?
But, after the fray starts … Instead of holding the higher ground befitting a learned scientist (especially one of caliber, if you are indeed
working the holy grail TOE) and replying in a professional manner, you get into name calling as your defense.
Read this: “Hey, look. I am working to perfect a mathematical theory I have. It isn’t complete, so, no, I will not disclose anything about it at
this time.” Saying something similar would have avoided all those “Manner & Decorum” that litter your posts.
And, you would have accomplished what you claim was your only mission. To warn the world.
I encourage you, and all who have read or posted this thread, to look back and tell me: Are you sure you didn’t want adoration and accolades from
the masses for your "just-in-time-post that saved the world"?
Notice a review: Those who agreed with you, were rewarded with kind words and mutual respect. I’ll point out you even recognized those voicing
agreement based on their personal psychic observances the kudos and replies – not something a scientist conducting research would even think to
acknowledge – more likely they would want discourse with those their side of the science/paranormal fence.
Am I attacking you, personally? No. No need to be uncivil.
Questioning: Your methods … Yes. Your sincerity … undecided. Your motives … always. Your veraciousness ... unyieldingly.
If you have an equation producing consistent results that check, are rechecked (and again for confirmation) via the scientific method - "Recreate
again and again … every which way “plus sideways thrice” (My old Prof’s phrase) Then I submit to you it is time to publish.
You know (as well as I do) for it to have any validity beyond your desk it will be required to survive the scrutiny of peer review.
Therefore; if this premise is true, you’re reluctance to post is inconsistent with normal practice. Posting on the net is the same as in print; your
intellectual property is protected by the Statutes of the Federal Copyright / Infringement Law from being stolen or copied.
You are preparing to do so in some journal exclusive. Perfectly understandable. If so, God bless ya. Please, do tell us where and when, after it
prints of course, so we can all check it out.
All of the above is only applicable if you truly are a formally educated scientist.
Here’s my thing,
IMHO, you are not.
Your actions are not congruent with those one would expect from a formally educated and acknowledged man of science. And don’t give me the mad
1. Posting your prediction on ATS? A conspiracy Website? No offense to the ATS owners/operators, of course. (Luv ya guys!) But, this isn’t a place
where a bona fide theorist would consider posting. Especially with a “Warning – to the people of earth” gotcha title. He would post in the
IJTP, JEPT, or the PTP. All three are recognized and renown theoretical journals.
2. If you have a theory and it checks, you’d be too proud not to tell about it, or at the very least, where you’ll be publishing it. (The curse
every theorist and discoverer cannot deny; the need to prove our successes).
- An equation must be PROVEN theoretically sound before any one result it produces can be deemed as correct or verified as proof of concept. And you
know it, ALLisONE. But, proof-positive is your claim, as you proudly boast in multiple posts here.
3. If you have a theory and it is still just concept or inconsistent in any way …
then you have lied to us, outright! Your prediction cannot be recreated, therefore; it is tantamount to a guess. Ergo; A fraud.
4. This is what I’m betting you have; A ‘pseudo’ theory. Some math, some mojo, and some mumbo jumbo to hide the smell. That would be consistent
with refusal to offer proof.
I stand by my accusation -
You, sir, are a fraud.
And I will be contacting the Mods directly to lodge a request this thread be formerly reviewed for making unsubstantiated claims in order to
perpetuate a hoax on this well respected site.
This is my last post to this thread.