It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
9 times out of 10 these countries are poor is because they have to get resources from the rest of the world that opporates under a monetary system based on differential advantage.
Cuba has to import 60% of its food - where does it get the money from? Nickel and Cigar exports?! Please! Get a grip on reality. Cuba is a tiny third-world island that is under the most brutal sanctions in the world - yet somehow they provide all their citizens with free and universal world-class health care, free education right through university, they send doctors all around the world, have scholarships for anyone from a third-world country (and the US), everyone gets fed and everyone has a job. They are in poverty because of the sanctions, and because they have no resources - but they have accomplished alot.
Look at any other country with a similar GDP and you will see the difference.
But BigMacs, Bentlys and BigScreen TVs are still a temptation.
Stalin was not "left-wing" he was a fascist who used a bureaucratic dictatorship with socialist rhetoric to enslave the russian people to polarise the world, allow the military industrial complex to take root, collapse itself and install a one-world super power (aka America).
Learn some world history.
Originally posted by Tiger5
Okay
And what shall we say of capitalism? It is clearly an unstable system that jumps from boom to bust and back in a never ending cycle. So perhaps we can have an OP that Capitalism is destroying Greece, The USA and the UK....
Capitalism nearly destoyed the global economy last year. The USA developed a toxic debt burden of a magnitutde that seems undefinably large and is a capitalist issue.
When wiull the cold war babblers just shut up?
You see how easy it is to make broadbrush comments devoid of clear political, social or economic analysis?
Originally posted by gdeed
The people have voted for change and they seem to be getting change. But not much change left in their pockets. Money is the root of all evil. But money sure comes in handy when buying food, clothing and shelter. An over regulated not so free enterprise system as Socialism is doesn’t seem to be working very well, just look at the huge unemployment numbers in those countries.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
reply to post by Tiger5
Sorry tiger,
I don't see it that way. Freddie, Fanny and AIG were caterer to by the FED and bailed by the FED against popular will. The institutions that were not in their pockets were allowed to fail. WTF Tax payers money.
That is not capitalism but dictatorship and Communism.
The real fact is that the Americans and it sounds like those Spanish folks, were swindled by the officials and their preferred banker buddies Goldman Sucks and the like. Not corporations.
If a financial institution is to big to fail, it is the governments fault it is to big to begin with.
The government in devious ways relaxed every safe guard as to allow that collapse to happen.
You start the revolt by impoverishing the population. That is what is in process. IMO
[edit on 28-2-2010 by Donny 4 million]
Originally posted by Tiger5
The socialists did not generate the banking crisis or the other periodic recessions.
[edit on 2-5-2010 by Tiger5]
Originally posted by Tiger5
It is difficult to deny ignorance when one side does not know the first thing about marxist theory and economics. Surely you good right wingers would want to study your enemies and in their won words.
Can I suggest the Communist manifesto as a primer. I live in a capitlist society and have also read Adam Smith et al.
Come on Lets "Deny Ignorance"
Originally posted by Someone336
reply to post by gdeed
Actually, I dare say that workers would have more incentive in their jobs if they had direct ownership of their company and profited from it.
Worker Cooperative
Originally posted by Tiger5
reply to post by gdeed
The greater good is all the incentive that I need. I can still only wear one suit at a time. The alternative is barbarianism. "Me first" politics leads corruption and conflict
Wealth can be gernerated under Socialism also. Better public service and health service can be developed under socialism.
[edit on 3-5-2010 by Tiger5]