and this argument about how its "their culture" and how we should respect their culture and stay out of it...you know i can understand how someone would feel that way. how they think that its good for other cultures to have certain things that are theirs, and theirs alone. but all that does...is further segregate people and further separate us.
so what if it was a cook-off, for a particular type of ethnic food...and they allowed ALL races to compete. now say the winners of this cook-off, just so happen to NOT be of the ethnic background of the main dish being cooked? is it then ok to award another first place prize to the runners up who ARE of that ethnicity? thats ridiculous! thats like saying, you didnt win, these other people were better than you...but because this cook-off was making a dish from your culture, we'll let you have first place too. how does that make ANY SENSE to people?
the message is that, these people stepped better than you...but because they're not black, we'll allow you to share first prize. in a nut shell, thats exactly the message their sending. the white people had a better performance, but we'll let you win too because you're black. how is that not racist? how is that not allowing these black people a sense of entitlement simply based on their skin tone? they didnt deserve to win, they didnt have as good of a performance. the only reason they're getting to "win" now, is because of their skin tone.
heres my personal opinion. the people were angry that someone beat them at "their own game". so instead of backing up the decision by the judges, which would probably encourage the other teams to work harder, be more creative, and come back with an even better performance next time, they said, oh its ok, we'll just create a second first place prize. and that teaches people its ok if you dont perform as well as the other guys, you'll still win because of your skin colour. how does that encourage harder work and more creativity? and how does that not perpetuate more racism?




