reply to post by greeneyedleo
IF there were an Equal number of Gay families as there are Straight families, you'd have a point.
Otherwise you're comparing a cup of water to a bucket of water and saying the bucket is heavier...
Originally posted by Edrick
reply to post by KevinHavoc
Honestly?
If you are trying to claim that homosexuals would make fit parents... you have to admit, having an emotionally charged knee jerk reaction to this post is *NOT* helping your case my friend.
When in debate, on a classy website such as this, it is important to remember the rules of Debate.
1. Insults are not arguments.
it may FEEL good, but it does not prove your opponent wrong, not one bit.
2. Argue with FACTS
Feelings are not truth, as they cannot be independently verified by an outside observer.
3. Maintain your cool.
Getting riled up makes you loose your rationality, and intellect... do not succumb to anger, or you will no longer be debating or discussing... you will just be yelling.
And people tend not to listen to people who yell at the top of their lungs.
4. Read the entire thread before you post, yelling at the OP... what you want to say may have been said before.
OR
You may have misunderstood the CONTEXT of the OP.
In this specific example, the study indicates that the proximity of the adopted parent being cared for by the homosexual parent has a negative effect on children BECAUSE OF OUTSIDE SOCIAL BIAS AGAINST HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS.
So, in essence, the article is a slant against the attitudes of SOCIETY'S dislike of Gay people, and not gays in general.
5. You do not talk about fight club.
-Edrick
[edit on 25-2-2010 by Edrick]
n 2004 the researchers studied about 200 Italian families and found that the mothers, maternal aunts and maternal grandmothers of gay men are more fecund, or fruitful, than average. Recently, they tried to explain their findings with a number of genetic models, and found one that fit the bill. "This is the first time that a model fits all our empirical data," said Andrea Camperio-Ciani, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Padova in Italy who led the study. "These genes work in a sexually antagonistic way — that means that when they're represented in a female, they increase fecundity, and when they're represented in a male, they decrease fecundity. It's a trait that benefits one sex at the cost of the other."
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by toochaos4u
Sorry but I really don't agree with it and I probably never will; a little girl shouldn't have two dads just like a little boy shouldn't have two mums.
A female can provide things for her daughter that no man ever could -simple!
Edit: How can someone be an "ex-gay"?
[edit on 25/2/10 by Death_Kron]
4) I dont really care what anyone else had to say and, i couldnt care less what the context was. This hits closer to home for me then it does you, unless your gay with a kid, or have gay parents.
Originally posted by Edrick
reply to post by KevinHavoc
4) I dont really care what anyone else had to say and, i couldnt care less what the context was. This hits closer to home for me then it does you, unless your gay with a kid, or have gay parents.
One of them... yes. I do.
So... ya know... we have a similar situation, as per your addendum.
-Edrick
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by toochaos4u
Sorry but I really don't agree with it and I probably never will; a little girl shouldn't have two dads just like a little boy shouldn't have two mums.
A female can provide things for her daughter that no man ever could -simple!
Edit: How can someone be an "ex-gay"?
[edit on 25/2/10 by Death_Kron]
Originally posted by toochaos4u
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by toochaos4u
Sorry but I really don't agree with it and I probably never will; a little girl shouldn't have two dads just like a little boy shouldn't have two mums.
A female can provide things for her daughter that no man ever could -simple!
Edit: How can someone be an "ex-gay"?
[edit on 25/2/10 by Death_Kron]
What are those things? Do tell. The only thing I can think of is birth canal.
I dunno how someone could be ex-gay. The religious folk have that figured out until their leaders are spotted in gay bars.
[edit on 25/2/10 by toochaos4u]