The answer to the meaning of life is about as hard to answer as the meaning of lightning, or the meaning of snow. The answer is deeply unsatisfying to
many, mostly because the "mystery" has been exaggerated and blown out of proportion. Religion has often been the preeminent domain offering answers,
but since they cannot come to a consensus on what that answer is - the question has not abated. The answer is generally assumed to be beyond our
capability, or converted into a rhetorical form meant more to make you ponder than to provide clarity.
So the answer to the meaning of life has been pretty much answered: Life is the expression understandable (though not fully understood) natural
physical processes such as chemistry, competition, reproduction, etc. For a more detailed explanation, I expressed my view in the second post of
this thread a few days ago.
The harder question to answer (which is perhaps why so many want to look towards an objective purposed deigned upon them by a higher power) is: What
meaning have you assigned to your life? That answer requires introspection, consideration, and the risk of criticism or rebuttal from others leading
to "wasted lives". It's much easier to simply assume a grander purpose beyond yourself. Beyond criticism and knawing doubt. A direction or ethic
code to tell you what to do with your life, as well as the ego-boost associated with aligning with a position that no other merely human reason can
trump. (circle back to religion: rinse repeat)
(Note: Even if you don't follow a religion, but still consider yourself spiritual or spiritually minded, religious influence on culture is so deeply
ingrained that you can't really escape it in most cases. New religious views are constructed out of patchworks and frameworks of existing abandoned
religions. Concepts such as a fall from grace into sin, redemption, reincarnation, salvation/rapture, end of the world judgment, rewards or
punishments after death, a soul of some sort which carries your essence, an interaction with past souls and physical space, etc.
For instance, Michael Crichton once famously pointed out that - in the anthropological sense - the environmental movement could be considered a
religion of the Judeo-Christian flavor. Both feature an ecological paradise in which we lived in harmony. The Noble Savage replaces Adam & Even in
this myth, and our expulsion from paradise (the start of civilization) began the tale of man's taint with sin (pollution). This sin/pollution will
eventually cause the creator/mother earth to punish us with horrors and an end to all things unless we seek redemption
(green/ecofriendly/sustainability). While environmental issues are very real and their impacts on humanity can be rather detrimental, many
environmentalists take it to the level of religious belief rather than a naturalistic view.
Common around here is the idea of Government/NWO playing the role of Satan, banks a signifier of greed & sin, and Aliens playing the role of Angelic
beings sent to save us from ourselves. Often engaged in another war with evil aliens (demons) over Earth... similar to the "war in heaven" and the
Devil's struggle to corrupt and destroy souls. Saviors can take many forms, be it the poster themselves, David Icke, David Greere, Alex Jones, Jim
Marrs, Blossom Goodchild, Z. Stichin, whoever.
I've also heard some claims being made in regards to how some transhumanists view the H+ movement in a semi-religious fashion, and regard people like
Aubry DeGray & Ray Kurzweil in the same framework as prophets or saviors. And I agree that such claims are not without merit, as I've talked to
examples of which. Though there is a noticeable effort in the community to squelch this concept and correct the misconception.
In your search for meaning to your life, be careful that it truly is your meaning you assign - and not the second hand rationale excised buffet style
from a religious source and handed to you as if profound wisdom hidden from the rest of humanity.)
[edit on 23-2-2010 by Lasheic]