It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

They Will Eventually Legalize Child Pornography

page: 1
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:11 PM
link   
This just goes to show you that once again the people at the top are pedophiles.

www.telegraph.co.uk...



Harriet Harman's political judgement and ambitions are now in question after she she called on ministers to make sexually explicit photographs or films of children legal unless there was evidence that the subject had been harmed.


Society will keep going downhill until a LINE is drawn.

At the rate they are going, they will eventually make child pornography legal as well as many other degrading material.

I remember reading about Cathy O'Brien who was used as a MK-Ultra subject and pedophiles took advantage of her including George Bush's Dad, Ronald Reagan, etc.

There were also stories about Ronald Reagan and his "Bedtime Stories" where he would have homemade child pornography made just for him.

And there's also this new documentary coming out called "The Warlord's Tune" produced and scripted by award winning documentary maker Jamie Doran.

www.abc.net.au...



Imagine being nine or ten years old. You are orphaned and living on the streets of a city in Afghanistan. You are approached by a man you do not know. He will clothe, feed and "protect" you. All you must do is learn to dance.

At first you will practice your routine with another young man. After weeks of training you will make your debut dancing before a crowd of men. Many are former warlords who helped the Karzai Government make its way to power. Others might be powerful businessmen. Before you dance you will be given clothes and make up to make you look feminine.

After the dancing, the men are excited and they bid for your company. If you please a warlord or businessman they will pay highly for your favours. Ultimately you will be traded, violated and abused by a large number of men. This is the world of the Bacha Bereesh, which means "beardless boys". These children are groomed to become sex slaves. It is not a new practice.

In Afghanistan the Warlords often kept young boys as their sexual partners. But in modern Afghanistan the practice has evolved into a lucrative and expanding business. In a country ravaged by war orphaned boys are being openly targeted by paedophiles. Some families are so poor that they are willing to sell their sons into slavery. Official reports now suggest thousands of children are at risk.



These sick people disgust me.

They should all be locked up for life.



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:14 PM
link   
I don't think this will ever happen, infact I think society is going the exact opposite, meaning more laws, more restrictions, less freedom. So I can't see why they would suddenly legalise it, unless of course politicians like that sort of thing.



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:24 PM
link   
reply to post by _Phoenix_
 


I tend to agree with you.

It seems like more and more laws are being thought about, and established.

Not to mention, pornography in general is one of the arguements for internet regulation. We have to keep our children safe, when we dont want to bother with menial tasks..like parenting.



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:28 PM
link   
I highly doubt this will come to pass. Simply because ALL cases of child pornography show that the child was hurt.

It's not just about physical pain, but about mental stability of the child as well. NO child should have their innocence taken away by somebody who needs to get off to a pre-pubescent body.

It just sickens me to the core.

The people who come up with these ideas should be tried and sent to prison for inciting societal de-evolution.

~Keeper



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:29 PM
link   
It still won't be acceptable to the mass public and those who process such filth will be dealt with... without a court of law.



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by CanadianDream420
It still won't be acceptable to the mass public and those who process such filth will be dealt with... without a court of law.


Amen to that friend!

These scum don't deserve a fair trial by their peers as far as I am concerned. Walk the plank with these ones, so to speak.

~Keeper



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:34 PM
link   
reply to post by _Phoenix_
 


Seems like politicians and judges are partial to it.
They are always soft on it.
But to legalize it would be to show their hand to even the dumbest voter.
It won't happen.
They will just continue to be soft on it until the public says enough is enough.
We suffer what we are willing to put up with, unfortunately.
At least now we know why Misss Harman is a Miss.
Dubious sexual morality.
Faulty moral compass.



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:35 PM
link   
How about the case of the man who drew a pornographic cartoon of a child?

How about the case of a man who wrote stories with a pedaphilic theme?

How about the multitude of cases where parents take pictures of their naked children because they think its cute, funny or just so heartbreakingly beautiful?

How about artists who paint pictures of naked child angels?

How about the cases of 16 year old boys taking pictures of their 15 year old girlfriends?

How about the cases of teenagers sexting?

Any and all of these cases fit the description of not having harmed a child but people were charged and their lives were destroyed by the charge!

TIRED OF CONTROL FREAKS



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by TiredofControlFreaks
How about the case of the man who drew a pornographic cartoon of a child?


He should get counseling...but cartoons aren't real life, look at Hentai in japan, it's a big business...



How about the case of a man who wrote stories with a pedaphilic theme?


I've never really seen any of these, but if they are stories, without pictures, then there's plenty of that all ready, again, look at hentai.



How about the multitude of cases where parents take pictures of their naked children because they think its cute, funny or just so heartbreakingly beautiful?


Obviously we have to use common sense and not waste the legal system's times with this moronic issue.



How about artists who paint pictures of naked child angels?


Religion alreadyh as a problem with pedophilia, and I don't think they draw them having sex...which is what child pornography is...



How about the cases of 16 year old boys taking pictures of their 15 year old girlfriends?


If we had cell phones 30 years ago, we'd be doing the same thing. Let kids be kids, so long as they aren't taken advantage of. You can't stop teenagers from having sex, all you can do is educate them.



How about the cases of teenagers sexting?


What a joke, they use to phone sex, now they just use words. Read the answer above.



Any and all of these cases fit the description of not having harmed a child but people were charged and their lives were destroyed by the charge!


Again, common sense people...

Was it that hard of a question to answer by yourself?

~Keeper



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:42 PM
link   
here is a perfect example of what I am talking about

www.theherald.com.au...

So what child was harmed by the downloading of pornographic simpsons and pokemon cartoons?

More importantly, what child was protected by society paying to have this man charged and put through the court system?

TIRED OF CONTROL FREAKS



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   
the only one to save us is the punisher ...



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by TiredofControlFreaks
here is a perfect example of what I am talking about

www.theherald.com.au...

So what child was harmed by the downloading of pornographic simpsons and pokemon cartoons?

More importantly, what child was protected by society paying to have this man charged and put through the court system?

TIRED OF CONTROL FREAKS


The west are just prudes that's all. Along with most of Europe, CARTOONS do no harm to anyone...If anything it keeps some pedophiles from going out and actually commiting the crimes they are fantazising about...

~Keeper



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Emerald The Paradigm
These sick people disgust me.

They should all be locked up for life.


Finally something I agree with from you

I seriously hope this doesnt come to pass because this is absolutely disgusting. Anyone that thinks child pornography should be legal is just as bad as the pedophiles committing these atrocities.

We should be voting for mandatory sterilisation of these pathetic excuses for human beings



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   
There was also a recent case of an American jailed over Lolicon Manga when Customs opened his shipment from Japan.

His entire Manga collection, probably everything he owned that was considered 'suspicious' was confiscated.

www.wired.com...

Though yeah, most of this child porn garbage is plain sick.
Though considering that only 250 years ago getting married and having children at 12-14 wasn't exactly uncommon, some things don't seem to vanish too fast over time.



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 04:54 PM
link   
I have often thought about this... Many things that were not permissible years ago are now.. How long will it be until this is ok??? Hopefully never.. But you never know so society as a whole has to be vigilant...

However In places like Pakistan for instance, there are places where you can sleep with an underage girl who is usually kept in a large cage... I know of a few cases where these poor girls who service at least 15 men a day are kept in these so that those men can justify their perversions by using Mohamed as an excuse because they "wan't to emulate the prophet,"


Good news is that a lot of these girls are rescued by US missionaries



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 05:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Emerald The Paradigm
 


The article is a year old and is in reference to something much older. HH is a legal eagle and the original references are to do with provability in a court of law, as to harm to a particular child when the pictures were taken. No doubt a political minefield, and No harm to the OP, but you really have to read the article again to be fair to people.



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 05:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Emerald The Paradigm
This just goes to show you that once again the people at the top are pedophiles.

www.telegraph.co.uk...



Harriet Harman's political judgement and ambitions are now in question after she she called on ministers to make sexually explicit photographs or films of children legal unless there was evidence that the subject had been harmed.


I remember reading about Cathy O'Brien who was used as a MK-Ultra subject and pedophiles took advantage of her including George Bush's Dad, Ronald Reagan, etc.

There were also stories about Ronald Reagan and his "Bedtime Stories" where he would have homemade child pornography made just for him.



Please provide your source regarding the past Presidents of The United States Of America..
Otherwise, this is libel.

[edit on 22-2-2010 by Violater1]

[edit on 22-2-2010 by Violater1]



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 06:09 PM
link   
You think it will? Because one politician once advocated for the watering down of some child porn laws? That is a rather large stretch there....


Just because one did, does not mean all politicians agree... In fact the article states that she is coming under fire for it... So that to me indicates that your accusation that all politicians at the top are pedophiles, is an unjust one...


Oh and by the way... You said you read about Cathy O'brien being taken advantage of by pedophiles... And you then accuse people such as George Bush and Reagen being pedophiles who played a part in that?

And you read that Reagen Had child pornography made for him?

My question is... Where the HELL did you read that? Tremendous claims require tremendous proof... And making baseless claims such as this is slander... Even if you got it from the internet somewhere then you need to consider the source....

If it came from some random buys blog or some unaccredited website, that is not legit at all... Then it is BS....



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 06:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
Here's something from godlike productions, referring to the Franklin report (about pedophiles in the halls of power in Washington DC).

www.godlikeproductions.com...



posted on Feb, 22 2010 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Emerald The Paradigm
 


There will always be lone nutters out there (lookin' at you, NAMBLA). Unless the rest of the government was backing her, I wouldn't worry about it. You can find political officials who will back anything. The question is can you find enough?




top topics



 
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join