If we re-rule the world

If the world had to re-rule itself after its problems and faults surfaced too much, what would the change be like?

I suppose redoing rule would bring about some cashless aspect to society for a change. An aspect where one may work for food and/or housing (with all utilities) instead of money. Basically like I said in another thread that it doesn't make sense for anyone to work a job that doesnt pay them enough to get a home of their own.

Why do jobs have to pay money? Why not pay in food or housing? What the hell is up with the world. You know sweepstakes reward you not with money all the time. So that says this current rule can be somewhat re-done. What can be done? A cashless society can be accomplished along side a society that still uses cash. It has to be both, and not one. You can learn a lot from a bum(b) with those signs saying, WILL WORK FOR FOOD or WILL WORK FOR SHELTER. Bum(b)s been teaching cashless society 101 for almost ages.

And if you dont like a part cashless society, then fine. To each their own. There shouldnt be a job that cant pay you enough money for you to get a home for yourself. These jobs should be against the law.

reply to post by Tormentations


If we were to re-rule the world as you speak...

We would need to create a worldwide community, become one and decide upon what happens with ourselves.

Im afraid we have evolved into something that we are not today, so this will never work without wiping out most of the earths population and starting a new...



[edit on 22-2-2010 by Freq Of Nature]

Originally posted by Freq Of Nature
reply to post by Tormentations

 

If we were to re-rule the world as you speak...

We would need to create a worldwide community, become one and decide upon what happens with ourselves.

Im afraid we have evolved into something that we are not today, so this will never work without wiping out most of the earths population and starting a new...

[edit on 22-2-2010 by Freq Of Nature]

This sounds exactly what an agent of the New World Order would say. Population reduction, one culture, one government...total control over the citizens.

That being said, I understand where you're coming from, and know what you're getting at. The problem is, if we all had to decide upon what happens; you'd find that no two people would want the same thing; so it becomes a moot point.