[

[edit on 21-2-2010 by TORCHurer]

Originally posted by TORCHurer
found this interesting looks to be a robot on mars right from the nasa panorama photo called "payson" by the opertunity rover in google earth on mars.if someone can explaine this or confirm that this is actually a failed probe from decades ago please feel free .in the vid it looks like it is burried to the chest and there is definitly antenna on both sides of what appears to be the head .needless to say check it out yourself on google earth the proof is right in nasas own pics

All I see are rocks and somebody with an over active imagination.
Be advised: I'm a believer in ET and possible Ancient Alien life on MARS!

you can easily see the junk whatever it is and it definitely is not an natural object. looks like some wreckage or some such thing.
Like the poster above, there will probably be many more that just pretend not to see anything , or say it is a rock or something. Maybe it is because some people naturally don't want to see other people finding anything.

Good catch, s&f

Nice rocks... weres the robot?

i ... don't see anything, lol.

what am I supposed to look for? Doesn't anyone have PICTURES of this, at least BETTER pictures?

definitely nothing in that vid. overactive imagination

[edit on 21-2-2010 by The Rickness]

before you comment just use google earth and see for yourself .dont just download the pic and look at it physically use google earth and use that zoom and then you can see that the object isnt natural

ignorance is actually assuming something before actually trying it?the fact that you are not willing or just too lazy to use the format that i did proves that you are the ignorant one no??

all i am saying is open google earth and check it out before you make any comments.downloading the pic isnt going to be the same .please use the same format i did and use google earth.ive viewed the immage both ways and i assure you that you can see it allot clearer and less pixelated in google earth.

thats all i am saying is that it is probably something that was left of a failed attempt and i was wanting to know if there was pictures of any failed mission craft that looked like this one from the google mars pic.and if it was actually a failed probe from back in the early days of our own space exploration then how is this thread concidered a hoax.i did not put the space junk up there.and i did not edit the photos.i just thought it was definitly a weird thing to see on the surface.maybe someone should call the russians and let them know exactly where their junk is.

[edit on 21-2-2010 by TORCHurer]

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
Nice rocks... weres the robot?

A robot is an automatically guided machine, able to do tasks on its own. Another common characteristic is that by its appearance or movements, a robot often conveys a sense that it has intent or agency of its own

As you don't say who are you answering, I don't know if your post was direct to me or not, but I will answer it anyway.

Originally posted by TORCHurer
all i am saying is open google earth and check it out before you make any comments.

I did, that's why I asked for some directions first, to look at it using Google Earth.

downloading the pic isnt going to be the same .

No, it's closer to the real image than what Google Earth shows.

please use the same format i did and use google earth.

Already did.

ive viewed the immage both ways and i assure you that you can see it allot clearer and less pixelated in google earth.

That is because Google does not resize the images, it resamples them, creating values for the missing pixels with what it "thinks" is the right colour, but that is just a guess by the software.

In reality, what you are seeing in Google Earth, once you pass the 100% zoom, its what Google Earth wants to show you, not the real photo.

Here are all the versions I have looked at.

From your video.


From Google Earth (Mars)


From the panorama in the NASA site, resized


From the panorama in the NASA site, resampled


And to me it looks natural in all versions.

I did, that's why I asked for some directions first, to look at it using Google Earth.
this is quoted right from your reply.

im sorry but i do not see in any of your posts where you are asking for directions.all ive seen is "nope i see nothing" so if you lie about asking for directions i have to assume that you lie about actually seeing the object? your own statements say that you have no credibility here.