It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
String theorists Neil Turok of Cambridge University and Paul Steinhardt, Albert Einstein Professor in Science and Director of the Princeton Center for Theoretical Science at Princeton believe that the cosmos we live in was actually created by the cyclical trillion-year collision of two universes (which they define as three-dimensional branes plus time) that were attracted toward each other by the leaking of gravity out of one of the universes.
In their view of the universe the complexities of an inflating universe after a Big Bang are replaced by a universe that was already large. flat, and uniform with dark energy as the effect of the other universe constantly leaking gravity into our own and driving its acceleration. According to this theory, the Big Bang was not the beginning of time but the bridge to a past filled with endlessly repeating cycles of evolution, each accompanied by the creation of new matter and the formation of new galaxies, stars, and planets.
Turok and Steinhardt were inspired by a lecture given by Burt Ovrut who imagined two branes, universes like ours, separated by a tiny gap as tiny as 10-32 meters. There would be no communictaion between the two universes except for our parallel sister universe's gravitational pull, which could cross the tiny gap.
Orvut's theory could explain the effect of dark matter where areas of the universe are heavier than they should be given everything that's present. With their theory, the nagging problems surrounding the Big Bang (beginning from what, and caused how?) are replaced by an eternal cosmic cycle where dark energy is no longer a mysterious unknown quantity, but rather the very extra gravitational force that drives the universe to universe (brane-brane) interaction.
Originally posted by OnceReturned
There is no argument here that the big bang is wrong, and in fact a big bang of sorts would still have occurred. According to this new theory, however, the bang was not spontaneous and was not the begining of all reality, rather it was just the begining of our universe.
"In the beginning, God [Elohim] created the Earth and Heavens..."
"For every ordinary time line, We created mass and energy..."
Bible proves science and science proves the bible. Yes, got to look beyond the words and sometimes at the elements of the page itself.
Originally posted by Whyhi
That's not a good comparison, your biblical quote implies there was a "creation", or 'something from nothing', if you will.
does anyone actually know if there was nothing here before the big bang?
Every single thing in the Universe follows a law of cause and effect...I dont think there is any reason to assume that something came from nothing.
Compare: "In the beginning, God [Elohim] created the Earth and Heavens..." with: "For every ordinary time line, We created mass and energy..." Bible proves science and science proves the bible. Yes, got to look beyond the words and sometimes at the elements of the page itself.
Originally posted by Hung Lo
reply to post by rleexray
My question is, does anyone actually know if there was nothing here before the big bang?
What are thoughts?
Do they have any attributes of matter
What the bible implies is that God willed matter into existence. The same way we will our actions into existence
This is why any theory that suggests that something cannot come from nothing is wrong
God is spirit