B2 - electrified hull claims, page

reply to post by angrysniper

---

I read this great book by Paul La Violette:

Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion:
Tesla, UFO's and Classified Aerospace Technology

It details his theory on the B-2 Bomber using anti-gravity tech by electrifying the hull.

b2 bomber had an electrified hull

All aircraft become electrified when flying.
Its a static charge phenomenon.

Anyone that has worked with helicopters in the military carrying sling loads can tell you that they must ground before ground crews can approach them.
the ground crews that forget this gets knocked on there ass.

Many aircraft have static wicks to dissipate these charges
www.aerospaceweb.org...
www.forensicexp-vojvodina.org.rs...

The reason for charging the leading edge and exhaust is secret. But there is no shortage of ideas.

For reasons not yet de-classified, the B-2 charges its leading edge to a very high electrical potential difference from its exhaust stream.
It has been suggested (by Jane's Defence) that it augments the B-2's low thrust main engines. It is also a well known phenomenon that an ionised gas (plasma) will scatter a radar beam far more effectively than a solid surface of any conceivable shape. This could be the purpose of the high voltage leading edge. Another possibility is that it is for the purpose of reducing drag, since the leading edge of the B-2 might then move through a partial vacuum of ionised air which may be ionised and repelled by the high voltage. In any case, it is however true that Northrop engineers conducted wind tunnel tests using high voltage on a testbed wing leading edge to reduce supersonic drag as far back as 1968. These tests were with a view to breaking up the airflow ahead of the wing using electrical forces in order to soften a sonic boom. How this applies (if indeed it does at all) to the B-2 after an interval of many years is uncertain.

en.allexperts.com...

reply to post by Catalytic

---

Thanks, They do tell you that you can't take any pictures of the rear of the plane, within 5 feet of it, or above the plane in the rear. So probably why you don't see a lot of pictures of those areas. I must say though standing above the plane looking at the exhaust they are impressive when you see what's there.

reply to post by Mondogiwa

---

Indeed what the plane is capable of doing should stay that way. As far as I know we only share some of those secrets with one other country, and even then not all of them.

reply to post by Everwatcher33

---

You know I've spent 3 months trying to find photo's that peep into these bloody exhausts and at best, you see fairly innocuous looking 'channels' that direct the exhaust onto to rear of the wing.

I've not found one that shows any detail (just suspicious inky blackness) of what is present further up the exhaust flow i.e. in the covered tunnels which preceed the uncovered channels.

I'm expecting to see some kind of mixing system in this region, at the least we might expect some method of mixing cold air (gathered by the small boundary layer ducts below the main intakes) with the hot exhaust.

Some have speculated that we might hope to see equipment to inject electrons into the exhaust in this area. If this were the case, presumably some kind of pertrubrances are present to penetrate into the heart of the flow and not just the periphiary. My guess as to what this may look like is some kind of helical arrangement of vanes the purpose of which is to dump electrons and help mix the cold air collected by the previously mentioned auxillary inlets

any thoughts? what does industrial gas mixing / cooling equipment look like? might this be a good place to start.

[edit on 9-5-2010 by Catalytic]

[edit on 9-5-2010 by Catalytic]

reply to post by Phage

---

Of those three theories, I seriously doubt that it augments thrust very much, except if the third theory is true which seems more plausible that it reduces drag. I guess you could say that reducing drag increases the "net" thrust.

The theory about scattering radar reflections is also credible.

Maybe it does both, reduces drag and scatters radar reflections. But I'm not finding increased thrust very likely (aside from the reduced drag).

reply to post by Catalytic

---

You won't find any pics up the exhaust. When they allowed me to do a walkaround on a B-2, they said there were two areas I couldn't see. One was the cockpit, the other was the exhaust. The F-117 flew for most of its life before they allowed us to get on a stand above the tail and get a peek at the exhaust. There's a lot that goes on in there to spoof IR sensors that they don't want anyone that doesn't have clearance seeing.

Drones to the rescue ~ Repairing local economies in Ohio, coming to your State soon!
  Posted 1 days ago with 12 member flags

Amazing video of 747 lifting in place in extreme wind conditions
  Posted 1 days ago with 11 member flags

Unmarked Chinese 747 rolls through SFO (San Francisco International airport)
  Posted 13 days ago with 10 member flags

Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags

Stealth chopper based in Nevada
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags

HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: