Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by PhotonEffect
No, it's not proof. Did he say he had proof? He clearly stated it was new evidence for the Eiscat theory.
I haven't seen this particular piece of info discussed in other threads, so why the opposition to this thread, are we not allowed to talk about this
in a thread of it's own?
In one of Tauristercus' threads you provided some new footage of the spiral event.
He took that footage and used it for a new thread, giving you credit for it.
Are you going to say the same to him as what you are saying to EM right now?
It's the same situation, you have to be consistent now Photondude.
Point man
IMO to compare what Tauristercus posts to that of what EM posts is doing a disservice to the former. Yes I provided that video to him publicly in his
thread for him to use for further analysis that was his own. He arrived at his own conclusions through his own mathematical work and research AND
presented it all for the most part as conjecture or just an opinion.
He doesn't speak in absolutes like EM prefers to do. Nor does he jump to unnecessary conclusions-- and if he does enter the realm of conjecture he's
says so...
perhaps EM can learn from that approach...
But you know what... you guys win. I won't take away from this thread any longer... even though its baseless
You all have your fun and I'll sit back and watch this one die just like all the others,
But I will say this one last thing
The only thing that could be considered good about this at this point is that perhaps some of us learned a little something about EISCAT...
What's bad though, is that since no one knows what they're talking about with regards to that facility and its experiments, they've twisted things
to suit their own agenda or preconceived notions to create a truth thats not based on facts
You believe that it was EISCAT and that's fine... Maybe you can email them and ask? Maybe invite one of the scientists who work there to join ATS
and tell us that EISCAT did it... now that would be fun to see.. but that burden lies with you
