Norway Spiral created by Eiscat (New Evidence), page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 63 times
Topic started on 19-2-2010 @ 09:32 AM by EvolvedMinistry
Personally, even I was getting tired about the possibilities of what created the Norway Spiral. After tons of conjecture, pages and pages of diagrams and people arguing, I'll admit, I was about to throw in the towel. Not because there was proof in either direction, but because it all seemed as if we were beating a dead horse with only opinions as our sourcing. However, new evidence has come to light. (Keep in mind that THIS STUDY was back in 1996 and is evident of atmospheric tampering.)

Star and Flag this...there are many members who need to see this with their own eyes.

This article was sent to me by another ATS member, Wolfenz, so...I am giving credit where credit is due.

I've heard all sorts of information from tons of members who were positive that they had shut down any possibility about the supposed capabilities of something that they don't have access to or understand (HAARP, EISCAT). I posted a million replies that scientifically stated the facts despite many members inability to accept it. However, here is a scientific study that comes directly from Harvard after their observance of Eiscat in action. The Norway spiral was NOT A MISSILE...PERIOD.

Here's a snippet of that info:

It should be pointed out that a most remarkable optical phenonemon was observed during the two heating cycles 21:20=21:24 UT and 21:30-21:34 UT. A development of local spiral-like forms in the auroral arc near Tromso occurred after the heater was turned on. Furthermore, the brightening and subsequent break-up of an auroral arc at 21:33:50 UT took place obove Tromso.


Here's your source:
articles.adsabs.harvard.edu...

If this source and thread has already been found as of recently, I apologize.


[edit on 19-2-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]


reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 09:51 AM by Romans 10:9
Read this abstract:

Abstract

Experimental results from HF pumping experiments in the nightside auroral E and F region are reported. The experiments were carried out by the use of the EISCAT HF heating facility located near Tromsø, Norway, allowing HF pumping the ionosphere in a near magnetic field-aligned direction. We present experimental results from multi-instrument observations related to heater-induced phenomena in a coupled ionosphere–magnetosphere system. The following results have been observed on different occasions: a reverberation effect in scattered signals observed simultaneously on two diagnostic paths which is an indication of Alfvén wave generation. This phenomenon was seen under specific disturbed background geophysical conditions, namely, a high electron density in the F region up to 8 MHz produced by soft electron precipitation from the magnetosphere along with low electron density in lower ionosphere; increased ionospheric electric fields; ion outflows from the ionosphere. On another occasion a magnetospheric response to heater turning on and off was found from magnetic pulsation observations over a frequency range up to 5 Hz (the upper frequency limit of the sensitive magnetometer at Kilpisjarvi, located near Tromsø). The response manifests itself about 1 min after the heater is turned on and off. Other results have shown the modification of a natural auroral arc and local spiral-like formation. It is thought that a local heater-driven current system is formed. An interesting feature is the generation of the heater-induced ion outflows from the ionosphere. They are observed in night hours under both quiet and disturbed magnetic conditions.

www.sciencedirect.com... 166583963&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=2f27e5cf8a8b9b7f51354245d3e53d0a


[edit on 19-2-2010 by Romans 10:9]


reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 09:53 AM by EvolvedMinistry
reply to post by Romans 10:9

Thanks for posting!!! Just more fuel for the fire.



reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 10:31 AM by Point of No Return
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry


Star and Flag, EM.

A development of local spiral-like forms in the auroral arc near Tromso occurred after the heater was turned on.


Soon, some guy....will come in and say:

"The heater wasn't marked for that day, according to this diagram from this site, your whole theory is bunk."

Lol.


reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 10:35 AM by EvolvedMinistry
Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry


Star and Flag, EM.

A development of local spiral-like forms in the auroral arc near Tromso occurred after the heater was turned on.


Soon, some guy....will come in and say:

"The heater wasn't marked for that day, according to this diagram from this site, your whole theory is bunk."

Lol.


Yeah...I think I know who "that guy" will probably be. I look forward to it.


reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 10:35 AM by Chonx
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry


Yea, no worries. Thanks again for finding this. I've just finished reading Tauristicus's 3rd thread in his analysis and he has come to the conclusion that a missile was partly responsible but something else, as yet unknown was also involved.

If it does turn out that EISCAT was responsible then you have yo wonder as to the nature of the effect and it's purpose. It's really amazing to think we might be dealing with something which for all intents and purposes, is brand new science (to us anyway)

And there I was thinking that the whole thing was done and dusted.

As I said earlier however, I'm reluctant to say for certain that what you have linked in the OP is related, but as muzzleflash put it:


Where did the famous spiral happen? Oh yeah, the same place the ionosphere heater is, which coincidentally can create "spiral like" visuals in the auroral arc.


certainly thought provoking.

[edit on 19-2-2010 by Chonx]


reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 10:37 AM by EvolvedMinistry
reply to post by Chonx


Yes it is thought provoking. And thank you for your support my friend. I'm glad that you're trying to remain objective. I'm afraid that my objectivity is now "out the window," so to speak.

This was the smoking gun that I was looking for.


reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 10:40 AM by PhotonEffect
This thread should not exist.

The member who provided you with the link already properly posted it in the existing thread titled TEQUILAsunrise - AKA Norway Spiral - Proof it was a scientific experiment.. This was the original thread about EISCAT and it's heaters as a possible cause for the spiral and has been thoroughly discussed.

Is it necessary to start new threads on this if its not your original work or a new idea?


reply posted on 19-2-2010 @ 10:41 AM by Point of No Return
reply to post by Chonx




If it does turn out that EISCAT was involved the you have yo wonder as to the nature of the effect and it's purpose. It's really amazing to think we might be dealing with something which for all intents and purposes, is brand new science (to us anyway)


I'm thinking that the spiral was a defense mechanism aginst rockets maybe.

If the Bulava was intercepted, the Russians are happy to say that it was a failure.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 12 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 8 hours ago, 52 replies