Continued from previous post ...
Conclusion (from Parts 1 & 2)
The popular belief and officially confirmed by Russia, is that the events that took place in the early morning of 9 December 2009 were in fact
actually a direct result of the firing of a Russian Bulava missile. My analysis also confirms a Bulava launch.
Based on a number of observer photos (and confirmed later by additional photos), the trajectory of the Bulava missile has been accurately determined.
It was launched from a location in the White Sea and assumed a trajectory flight path that if concluded successfully, would have resulted in the
Bulava accurately impacting down range within the Kamchatka Peninsula missile test area.
It has also been shown that the majority of the spiral event appears to have taken place above the Earths atmosphere.
Based on the above unassailable points, there is absolutely NO reason to believe that apart from the role played by the Bulava missile, that any other
agencies such as EISCAT, HAARP, etc had any part of the event creation.
However, having shown how the conjectured propellant leaks within the 3rd stage could not conceivably produce the observed highly detailed and
structured spiral structure as observed, there is at present no alternative and plausible mechanism to account for the observed effects.
So in the final analysis, the Bulava has been confirmed as having a role but it's becoming increasingly apparent that whatever the true cause of the
spiral event, it most certainly was NOT the result of an accident or malfunction within the Bulava.
Having shown that the Bulava played a role in the spiral event BUT that the available evidence does NOT substantiate or corroborate in the slightest
the prevailing 'official explanation' of a 3rd stage failure, this is about as far as I can go in my analysis based on publically available
However, there is one particular aspect of the spiral itself that bears having a look at - and that's to try and get a look at whats actually
happening at the very center of the spiral itself.
A cursory examination of the center structure of any of the available spiral photos would lead one to believe that there is no detail whatsoever
visible, more so when one considers that the event was photographed/videoed from a distance in excess of 800 kms. Also, the central brightness also
has the unfortunate effect of washing out and masking any details which might exist.
But all is not lost - and in my Part 2 thread, I had already displayed an enlarged image that clearly shows central detail.
In the remainder of this 3rd and final thread, I hope to demonstrate that there actually are 3 photos that when processed, do show substantial detail
that is NOT the product of image error, pixellation, etc but seem to clearly indicate that SOMETHING unusual can be seen to be happening at the very
center of the spiral, and that whatever it is, again it does NOT support or validate a simple mechanical failure of the 3rd stage.
What I'm about to show is based on the following 3 observer images:
Now looking at the above images, it's almost impossible to make out any details in the centers of the spirals due to the brightness that overwhelms
However, a simple way to eliminate the whitewash effect is by looking at a negative of the image, rather than the original.
Here we have the same 3 images but in negative. You can see how the excessive brightness at the 3 respective centers is no longer an issue.
Ok, now lets take a look at the 1st of the 3 above images and enlarge it 15 times ... and this is what we see.
Unless you wish to remain in denial mode, you can't but agree that at the center of the spiral appears to be a definitive structure that is connected
to the innermost ring. What the structure may be, is unfortunately unknown.
But wait, I can already hear the howls of dissent from the 'image experts' out there who are yelling that I can't just use an image of an event
taken 800+ kms away, then enlarge it considerably and not expect to have significant pixellation, random image artifacts and image degradation come
To which I reply ... "I totally agree with you" ... however ...
If I had instead chosen to use Photoshop or Windows Photo Viewer to do the enlargement, this is what we'd end up ... massive pixellation and
significant loss of detail as in this image where I used Photoshop to enlarge x15 ... and Windows Photo Viewer is even worse.
So how did I manage to achieve such significantly higher resolution results with minimal pixellation or degradation ?
I researched and found a software package for image enlargement that is virtually in a league of it's own. This software is called SizeFixer XL and
you can read about its incredible capabilities here:
The technology has its roots in government and military use, including NASA imaging. Called a “world-first for
commercial use of super-resolution deconvolution technology,” ... SizeFixer is now available to the public.
And the superiority of this software is obvious when it's enlargements are compared to that of Photoshop, etc.
So essentially, if the enlargements show an artifact at the center of the spiral, then the probability of it NOT being pixellation or degradation is
Having said the above, lets now use this software to enlarge the 2nd and 3rd images and see what we get.
Here's image2 enlarged ... once again, significant artifacts and structural details are clearly visible at the center of the spiral. The connection
between the silvery/shiny artifact and the innermost ring is also clearly visible.
It should be noted that at the distance of 800+ kms that the above images were taken at, that we should NOT expect to see any sign of the 3rd stage
which is only a few metres in length. So whatever the above artifacts may be, they are without doubt huge to show up in such detail.
And here's the 3rd image enlarged x15 ... no obvious artifact to be seen but the center is shown in significant detail.
So what's the overwhelming conclusion that I have drawn from the analysis and evidence presented in this 3rd thread, coupled with my previous 2
threads relating to the Norway Spiral event ?
Continued next post ...
Was a Russian Bulava missile involved ? UNDENIABLY YES
Was the spiral event due to a simple 3rd stage malfunction ? UNDENIABLY NO
Was EISCAT, HAARP or similar technology involved ? ALMOST CERTAINLY NO
Was the spiral event the result of the application of unknown technology associated with the Bulava missile ? MOST PROBABLY YES