It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
I'm just looking at the information on Fascism
It will be seen that, as used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else.
Yet underneath all this mess there does lie a kind of buried meaning. To begin with, it is clear that there are very great differences, some of them easy to point out and not easy to explain away, between the régimes called Fascist and those called democratic. Secondly, if ‘Fascist’ means ‘in sympathy with Hitler’, some of the accusations I have listed above are obviously very much more justified than others. Thirdly, even the people who recklessly fling the word ‘Fascist’ in every direction attach at any rate an emotional significance to it. By ‘Fascism’ they mean, roughly speaking, something cruel, unscrupulous, arrogant, obscurantist, anti-liberal and anti-working-class. Except for the relatively small number of Fascist sympathizers, almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’. That is about as near to a definition as this much-abused word has come.
But Fascism is also a political and economic system. Why, then, cannot we have a clear and generally accepted definition of it? Alas! we shall not get one — not yet, anyway. To say why would take too long, but basically it is because it is impossible to define Fascism satisfactorily without making admissions which neither the Fascists themselves, nor the Conservatives, nor Socialists of any colour, are willing to make. All one can do for the moment is to use the word with a certain amount of circumspection and not, as is usually done, degrade it to the level of a swearword.
Originally posted by MMPI2
Geez...here recently I've been gigged by a couple of mods for throwing out "rhetoric" but for crying out loud, if any post here is truly rhetoric and propaganda, it's this one.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Sarah is just the opposite of a Fascist. Anyone who thinks Sarah is a Fascist has obviously NOT been doing their homework and is only getting their info from the MSM or extreme liberal sources.
Also, anyone who thinks Sarah is stupid should take a long look in the mirror because that is a ridiculous statement and again they must have been brainwashed by the MSM or extreme liberal sources.
Unfortunately, it is easier for some people to take the word and opinions of others while watching 30 second YouTube clips instead of doing their own research and using their own brain to form original thought.
The whole book banning by Palin is total rubbish and a lie. Those who believe this are only proving my points listed above regarding the MSM and extreme liberal sources.
The bogus Sarah Palin Banned Books List
All the lies and misrepresentation of Sarah is sad and shows how far some wil go to prevent those who believe in LESS government, LOW taxes, LESS regulation and Individualism to gain power.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
All the lies and misrepresentation of Sarah is sad and shows how far some wil go to prevent those who believe in LESS government, LOW taxes, LESS regulation and Individualism to gain power.
Originally posted by Phlynx
Originally posted by MMPI2
Geez...here recently I've been gigged by a couple of mods for throwing out "rhetoric" but for crying out loud, if any post here is truly rhetoric and propaganda, it's this one.
So for having another opinion, what I am saying is propaganda? That is quite a stupid assumption.
[edit on 21-2-2010 by Phlynx]
Originally posted by AlreadyGone
Fascism is private ownership and private enterprise, BUT directed by the state. For instance, the government allows private car companies to exist, but runs them. The government allows private banks or investment firms, but runs them. The government allows private energy companies, but runs them. Hmmmm... who is the fascists really.
Originally posted by Phlynx
In your case you are replacing the liberal media sources that I shouldn't be looking at, with the conservative media sources.
My source was wikipedia.
You try to bash everything I said with no sources but something that appears to be a blog.
Originally posted by whaaa
If you believe that this is what exgov Palin will bring; you show extreme naiveté. Sarah will sell out to the highest corporate bidder on all issues; allow tax breaks to obscenely profitable oil companies