Originally posted by AnthraAndromda

Originally posted by simranjits

You have 13 markers matching for your 14 markers. Thats means when you key in 16, the 13 markers remains the same. Theres no requirement that you need to match exactly. But if you match on the 13 markers thats a good match already. That means YOU share a common ancestor with this individual about 20 odd generations ago. You have thousands of matches at 12 markers and below , which is very good and normal for r1b. To give you context , i only have 1 12 marker match, and i'm not alien.

So how can you be ET when you share common ancestors with humans. This alone says you don't have ET DNA!.

I am a regular on DNA forums , you might want to pose your questions there.
You may have other issues but you have definately human dna.

I'm not sure what criteria you used to get those results, but they are vastly different than the results I obtained.

For instance, when I did a search I got NO matches, even loose ones, until I reduced the number of markers to 10, and then I got one, and even that required stretching the rules of biological mutation a fair bit. And of the matches at 8 markers there were multiple haplotypes (R1b, A, and others). Further, as I have already said, reducing the size of the data set virtually guaranties more matches, none of which may be relevant.

So far this exercise in DNA has not provided enough data to determine IF I am a Terrestrial Human, or simply "Human like".

Your analysis of the data would seem to jump to conclusions that aren't supported by biological science.

While your analysis may be worth considering, I must say that in 40+ years as a software engineer and 15 or so specifically in data analysis, it is my opinion that your conclusions are incorrect. But, we shall see when there is more data.

Etharzi od Oma

Originally posted by simranjits

It's really very simple , do a snp test for r1b , str markers don't confirm haplogroup. It is only a prediction. Even On 16 markers it is a prediction. Even with more markers , the only way to confirm is to test the snps responsible for r1b. I'm not sure what the name of the mutation/snp that causes r1b. You can check up the r1b wikipedia.

If you were a bit interested in dna testing , you would know this. All you got was a 16 marker test and some codis results and you think you're an alien?

So wake up and get a proper test, i can advise you properly, if you're interested. Like i said even a 10 marker match means you and that individual have a common ancestor!

If you were ET, the testing company would have got all excited like they discovered the new hominid species recently in siberia.

Originally posted by DrJay1975
Ok I will U2U the address. Just for reference Ramen is about 8 years old when being used for species ID.

Originally posted by Comic
Hello, Andromda; you don't mind if I ask you some questions, now do you?

Also, I'm not sure if one of these questions I'm about to ask you are questions that you've already answered; I'm apologizing on advance If they are.

1.) How big are starships? You told me that your mom has seven of them in Dallas?

2.) If the world does end in the next few years, would your kind be able to save us (taking us to another planet, and have humans live there from now on?)

3.) If you still have any contacts with aliens in any way, can you tell them to come to my house? I would love to talk to them.

Originally posted by DrJay1975
Anthra I'm back from my trip. The forensics pro asked for the data you've obtained so far prior to conducting the test. I've submitted what you've given us here and your website.

He suggests the test is a waste of my time and his time. There is nothing to indicate you are not human.

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda

Originally posted by DrJay1975
Anthra I'm back from my trip. The forensics pro asked for the data you've obtained so far prior to conducting the test. I've submitted what you've given us here and your website.

He suggests the test is a waste of my time and his time. There is nothing to indicate you are not human.

My research into that test indicated the same, though it would have been interesting just the same.

The nature of the data I currently have does "look" human, but, then again, it was obtained using Human Primers for the DNA extractionm so it is very likely that the results would "look" Human. However, it is the nature of the "Human" described by those results that must be taken into account, and compared with the physical me.

So far the results indicate African descent, Haplogroup "A", and no european descent. Yet I appear European (light skin, hair, blue eyes, etc.)

I've been working on a software project recently, and while I intend to build a new computer with what I'm making, it will also allow me to do some additional testing soon ... we'll see what those results tell us.

Etharzi od Oma.