It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The boy may have been hit by the US military. They dont know who fired the shot.
That said, good for them for helping. But isnt that what a mission to 'spread freedom' is supposed to do?
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The boy may have been hit by the US military. They dont know who fired the shot.
That said, good for them for helping. But isnt that what a mission to 'spread freedom' is supposed to do?
And he might have been hit by the Taliban (remember, AKs use 7.62), but I really don't see them rushing to the aid of this kid.
Originally posted by rainfall
jerico........
If the criminal U.S. military wasn't illegally occupying that country, that boy would not have been shot in the first place...
Military industrial-congressional complex = DEATH
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by rainfall
jerico........
If the criminal U.S. military wasn't illegally occupying that country, that boy would not have been shot in the first place...
Military industrial-congressional complex = DEATH
And maybe the kid wouldn't have been shot if the Taliban didn't use civilians as human shields.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by jerico65
And maybe the kid wouldn't have been shot if the Taliban didn't use civilians as human shields.
Originally posted by rainfall
And maybe the taliban wouldn't have to use civilians as human shields if the criminal U.S. military wasn't occupying their country.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
this is a garbage deflection.
Human shields are not a new tactic, have been used by nearly every country on earth, and dont explain the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of Iraqi civilians killed.
Originally posted by rainfall
Originally posted by jerico65
And maybe the kid wouldn't have been shot if the Taliban didn't use civilians as human shields.
And maybe the taliban wouldn't have to use civilians as human shields if the criminal U.S. military wasn't occupying their country...
[edit on 17-2-2010 by rainfall]
Originally posted by rainfall
And maybe the taliban wouldn't have to use civilians as human shields if the criminal U.S. military wasn't occupying their country...
The United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan (UIF, Jabha-yi Muttahid-i Islami-yi Milli bara-yi Nijat-i Afghanistan), more commonly known as the Northern Alliance, was a military-political umbrella organization created by the Islamic State of Afghanistan in 1996. The organization united various Afghan groups fighting against each other to fight the Taliban instead.
In late 2001, with assistance from U.S. air support and special forces assistance, the UIF succeeded in retaking most of Afghanistan from the Taliban. Despite fears of a return to the chaos similar to that of the Afghan Civil War (1992-1996), the UIF factions largely accepted the new order.
Although recognised by most foreign nations as the legal government, it only controlled up to 30% of the country. President Burhanuddin Rabbani was the national head of the United Islamic Front, however the central government had little power and personnel changes were frequent.
The exception to this was the post of Defence Minister, which was held by Ahmed Shah Massoud and Mohammed Fahim. Before the 9/11 attacks; Russia, China, the Central Asian nations of the Commonwealth of Independent States, India, Turkey and Iran were giving aid to UIF. However Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the UAE were supporting the Taliban.
And maybe the taliban wouldn't have to use civilians as human shields if the criminal U.S. military wasn't occupying their country...