For people new to the world of UFOs, it's a place full of incredible events spoilt by skeptics and debunkers. For people who've been around the
subject a bit longer, it's a place of incredible events spoilt by hoaxers, debunkers and plain old liars. The great researchers describe it as the
'rabbit hole,' 'the sandpit' and a place to drive you crazy. In the middle of all this UFOs are witnessed regularly...regardless of believers or
skeptics interpretations of them.
In this thread, I'd like to focus attention on the hoaxes and fiction of Ufology. Shaggy dog tales, rumours and classic fiction. They've been around
long before the 1940s surge in interest and have continued to this day. Many of them actually foreshadow UFO incidents that were yet to occur. They
make interesting reading and raise serious questions.
Greys have been described accurately by H.G Wells in 1893. Cattle mutilations made the press way back in 1897. As Skyfloating's cool
Flying Saucer thread has illustrated...even flying saucers were conceived before they
became part of popular culture. What we describe as cigar-shaped UFOs were once known as
other-wordly airshipsand hit the late 19th century and early 20th Century Press.
People lie for a number of reasons...attention, notoriety, mental illness and sometimes good old fashioned mischief. Some incidents are just for the
sheer amusing hell of it. The subject is also infested by people with agendas more elaborate than this. Cover-ups and disinformation are not always a
paranoid fantasy. They happen. A lot of time and effort has been applied to ensure that every supposed fact is counter balanced with a lie, if, but
and maybe.
Anyone that researches or shows an interest in Ufology for a length of time feels like they're chasing their own tail. Round and round in circles. In
interviews, the likes of George Knapp, Don Ecker, Frank Warren, Bruce Maccabee, Hynek, Vallee and many more attest to quitting out of frustration.
There's something big and mysterious happening and the answers are always a fingertip away. For this reason they always come back. It's like looking
into the abyss when the abyss looks back...
Anyway, enough of all that...let's go back in time...
On April 23, 1897, a Kansas newspaper, the Yates Center Farmer's Advocate, reported an incredible story. On the evening of April 19, local
rancher Alexander Hamilton, his son, and a hired man saw a giant cigar-shaped UFO hovering above a corral near the house. Hamilton claimed that in a
carriage underneath the structure were "six of the strangest beings I ever saw." Just then, the three men heard a calf bawling and found it trapped
in the fence, a rope around its neck extending upward. "We tried to get it off but could not," Hamilton said, "so we cut the wire loose to see the
ship, heifer and all, rise slowly, disappearing in the northwest."
The 1897 Cow
Abduction Hoax
The claimant in this case was supported by local respectable citizens. Their support alleviated doubts people might have. What came out much, much
later was that both he and the 'respectable citizens' were members of a 'Liars Club.' The name of the game was to see who could tell the biggest
lie. For decades, this account was taken seriously. There are still liars clubs today.
What makes this original hoax account all the more interesting is the addition of cattle mutilation...
The next day, Hamilton went looking for the animal. He learned that a neighbor had found the butchered remains in his pasture. The neighbor,
according to Hamilton, "was greatly mystified in not being able to find any tracks in the soft ground."
In one elaborate practical joke we see at least two common features of modern Ufology...cigar-shaped craft and animal mutilations. I mentioned fiction
too. Not fiction as in BS, but genuine fiction. It's a genuine point of debate as to where and when Greys became part of the fabric of UFO mythology.
Abduction accounts are rife with them. Roughly, they represent 50% of alien descriptions in the Western world. The figure isn't consistent in every
country, but these guys represent a significant portion of reports.
The first descriptions of our small, large-eyed friends appeared in the late 19th Century in an article by H.G Wells...'The Million Year Man.' He
described our future selves with large bald heads and small bodies. In another outing, "The First Men in the Moon" he described the Moon critters as
"gray skin, big heads, large black eyes and wasp stings."
Greys Wiki
There's a theme here. Modern ideas of UFOs and their occupants have a provenance in fiction and imagination from long before they became 20th Century
icons.
Back in '84...as in '1884,' a bunch of cowboys made the local newspaper when they saw a spaceship crash...
On June 6, 1884, as a band of cowboys rounded up cattle in remote Dundy County, Nebraska, a blazing object streaked out of the sky and crashed
some distance from them, leaving (according to a contemporary newspaper account) "fragments of cog-wheels and other pieces of machinery . . . glowing
with heat so intense as to scorch the grass for a long distance around each fragment." The light was so intense that it blinded one of the
witnesses.
Nebraska
4 days later the '60 foot by ten foot' cylinder had dissolved without a trace. Local residents were asked about it years later and had no idea and
it was judged a
probable hoax.
It's intriguing to me and others that the idea of alien visits and UFO crashes seems ingrained in our psyche. It leads to questions without answer.
Are we creating the UFO myth from imagination or wishful thinking? Are we projecting our ideas on unknown phenomena? Guys like Mac Tonnies wondered if
the UFO phenomena shapes itself to our preconceptions. He wasn't alone in considering the mystery to be almost unfathomable. What past cultures saw
as angels and dragons, we see as technological beings. The UFO subject has always reflected the beliefs of the people interested in it. Ronald Reagan
suggested an alien threat. Greer and the Exopolitics crowd claim world peace and free energy is waiting for us. Anti-Nuclear Weaponry guys believe
UFOs will prevent nuclear war. Some see them as benevolent and others as hostile.
One of the seminal purveyors of the 'ET are benevolent' hypothesis was the well-known hoaxer Adamski. He supplied photos and tales of ET
discussions. His claims pre-empt those of Exopolitics by 60 years.
George Adamski (April 17, 1891 – April 23, 1965) was a Polish-born American citizen who became widely known in ufology circles, and to some
degree in popular culture, after he claimed to have photographed ships from other planets, met with friendly Nordic alien "Space Brothers", and to
have taken flights with them. The first of the so-called contactees of the 1950s, he styled himself to be a "philosopher, teacher, student and
saucer researcher." though was often considered to be deluded or a fraud.[2]
Adamski Wiki
Also...
in his own words.
My favourite hoax is the shaven space monkey created by a bunch of friends in the 50s. I U2Ud it to JKrog and he actually swore. Tut tut tut! 'WTF is
that?!' was the response
Three frightened young men were waiting nervously by the side of the road. And lying there on the tarmac in front of the truck, illuminated by the
vehicle's headlights, was a bizarre two-foot tall creature that looked for all the world like a space alien. The young men spilled out a strange
tale. They said they'd been out in their truck "honkey-tonking" around, when they came over a hill and suddenly found themselves careening towards
a flying saucer that was 'glowing red all over.'
Three small aliens were outside the craft wandering up and down the highway. The boys jammed on their brakes, but couldn't avoid hitting one of the
aliens. The other two spacemen made it to the ship and blasted off.
The Great Monkey Hoax
It's fugly!
1960s Tinfoil Spaceman Hoax
Billy Meier on Venus?
Billy Meier's alien is shy.
I've tried to be serious and light-hearted in this OP. UFOs are a stone cold fact. They're out there. I've seen them and many others have too. A
big question is how much of the mythology surrounding them is ours? Where does imagination and interpretation meet reality?
EDIT to add a couple of links and nail a spelling error that I can't find under edit
[edit on 17-2-2010 by Kandinsky]