Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Becuase he also states that him and another witness should have been able to tell what the plane was. Also the fact that he was told later completly
affects the statement of what he saw.
His statement should be about what he saw and not what he was told later.
First, exactly who are we talking about here? Which statement?
And, as mikelee points out below these are statements made to the press, not police interragotories. Still doesn't detract from what they said.
Again, specifically to which statement are you referring?
There are dozens, most only refer to "a plane" some of witnesses were able to make out that it was an American Airlines plane some were able to tell
it was a passneger plane, and I think one, a military officer at the Navy Annex thought it was either a 757 or an airbus. Now are we to dismiss all
these statements because the press later reported that it was American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757?
[edit on 28-3-2010 by REMISNE]