It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
So, exactly what is it you're doing to achieve this goal of showing "reasonable doubt"?
Well i actually do research, file FOIA request and send e-mails to find the truth.
What have you done to find the truth?
Originally posted by hooper
And exactly how does all that relate to showing doubt in a court of law, which is what you are contending and what I responded in reference to.
And where is your collection of this much vaunted "research"? And what was the result of your FOIA request?
Nada, nothing or zilch?
Originally posted by DCDAVECLARKE
Dont beat about the bush man, id love to see evidence to support your idea off the official story! alright lets be having it I want a good laugh
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Roger e-mailed a company that was working at Ground Zero. They told him to buzz off.
He filed a FOIA for the FDR from the NSTB. He received it, but has no idea what to do with it.
He also filed a FOIA with the NSA for an alleged critic that talks of a military shoot down of flight 93. This was over a year ago.
Still waiting for it to be declassified.
Originally posted by hooper
I saw what you claim to be a response to your FOIA and I don't recall any mention of the material needing to be "declassified"?
Is that something you are just throwing into the mix?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
I saw what you claim to be a response to your FOIA and I don't recall any mention of the material needing to be "declassified"?
Is that something you are just throwing into the mix?
No, you just did not read the response. I requested a declassified copy of the Critic, the original is classified.
Originally posted by hooper
Assuming, of course it exist and it is classified.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Assuming, of course it exist and it is classified.
I have access to the orignal document and it is classified.
Thats why I requested a declassified copy to post.
Originally posted by hooper
Just want to make sure we are all working on the same baseline of the definition of "proof'.
Originally posted by REMISNE
I have facts and evidence that show reasonable doubt in the official story.
Originally posted by dereks
Why not post them here then, instead of keeping them to yourself - we have not seen any facts or evidence from you yet.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by DCDAVECLARKE
Dont beat about the bush man, id love to see evidence to support your idea off the official story! alright lets be having it I want a good laugh
I do not support the official story.
I have facts and evidence that show reasonable doubt in the official story.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Just want to make sure we are all working on the same baseline of the definition of "proof'.
The response from the NSA states i requested a declassified copy of the document.
i114.photobucket.com...
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Just want to make sure we are all working on the same baseline of the definition of "proof'.
The response from the NSA states i requested a declassified copy of the document.
i114.photobucket.com...
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Just want to make sure we are all working on the same baseline of the definition of "proof'.
The response from the NSA states i requested a declassified copy of the document.
i114.photobucket.com...
Originally posted by hooper
Ok, that letter posted on photobucket is quoting you calling for a "declassified" document. They are not saying it is classified.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Ok, that letter posted on photobucket is quoting you calling for a "declassified" document. They are not saying it is classified.
I requested a declassified copy of the documment because the original is classified. What is so hard to understand about that?
Why would i request a declassified copy if the original was not classified?
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Can you prove that the original document is classified?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Ok, that letter posted on photobucket is quoting you calling for a "declassified" document. They are not saying it is classified.
I requested a declassified copy of the documment because the original is classified. What is so hard to understand about that?
Why would i request a declassified copy if the original was not classified?