It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Barely enough????
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Really? When did he stand trial?
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Anyway...you asked for evidence that would hold up in a court. You got it. I can't wait to see how the goal posts get moved.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
LMFAO... Roger, you asked for evidence that would hold up in a court of law.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by ImAPepper
LMFAO... Roger, you asked for evidence that would hold up in a court of law.
You have not posted any evidence that would hold up in a new court case that would support the official story.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
I'm taking a screen shot of this one. Simply priceless.
Originally posted by REMISNE
I am still wating for you to post actual evidence and do not be immature enough to try to use the old trial evidence.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
This is insane. Chock Full O' Stundies
Originally posted by REMISNE
Thanks for admitting you cannot post any actual evidence that supports the official story.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Honestly... I'm done with you on this thread. You asked for evidence that would stand up in a court of law. You got it.
Originally posted by REMISNE
If the official story was brought to court today it would probably be laughed right out of court due to the lack of real evidence to support it.
Originally posted by dereks
Wrong again, it is the conspiracy theories that would be laughed out of court -
pod carrying aircraft, invisible noiseless explosives
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by dereks
Well since most of the evidence and the official reports have not been released then yes the official story would be laughed out of court.
Originally posted by hooper
When were any of your "theories" tested in court? Any success there yet?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
When were any of your "theories" tested in court? Any success there yet?
Why do you seem so afraid of court, maybe because you know the official story would not hold up since all those EXHIBTS from the first trial would have be reargued to be allowed in as evidence in a new trail?
By the way i know the government documents and other evidence i have would show reasonable doubt in the official story.
Originally posted by hooper
Really, can't wait. However it will be a monumental waste of taxpayer money.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Really, can't wait. However it will be a monumental waste of taxpayer money.
Since when is finding the truth a waste of money?
Again all i have to do is show reasonable doubt in the official story in court.
Originally posted by hooper
So, exactly what is it you're doing to achieve this goal of showing "reasonable doubt"?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
So, exactly what is it you're doing to achieve this goal of showing "reasonable doubt"?
Well i actaully do research, file FOIA request and send e-mails to find the truth.
What have you done to find the truth?