The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement., page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 46 times


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:50 AM by Ridhya
It wouldnt let me edit. Anyways,
DONT pass it off because its in the bible, I am agnostic myself, just look at it as another piece of the puzzle.

Zechariah 12 says the world will invade Israel but be wiped out, I can only assume this would be the nukes Vanunu spoke of.

Going to be a sad coupla years...


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 06:25 AM by Alfie1
Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to
post by Alfie1







Alfie1, I'm curious...

For those of you who like to say, "There's no hard evidence," what the hell is your idea of "hard evidence," then? Do you want a photograph of Cheney detonating explosives outside the WTC? Do you want a taped conversation between Bush and bin Laden talking over the details of the WTC attack?

Will it take the Bush administration, the CIA, and whomever else in our govt. played a part coming out and publicly admitting guilt for you people to accept it? You probably would find a way to debunk even the things I just mentioned, so there's likely no "hard evidence" that would pass your test anyway. Why don't you just say it, "I won't accept any evidence as valid, no matter what it is."


By "hard evidence" I mean something which would prompt a law enforcement agency to act in the first place and which could ultimately be put before a jury with a resonable prospect of getting a conviction.

If some truther theories are true there are very many possibilities as to what that evidence might be.

For example, if WTC 1, 2 & 7 were rigged for demolition then the explosives, detonators, det. cord etc had to have come from somewhere, there must be records about it's existence. It must have been transported to the WTC site; what vehicles, from where, who drove ? There must have been teams of installers involved, who were they ? They must have known what they were doing, there is only a limited number of people who are qualified to do this work. Were they employed by demolition companies ? How were they paid ? Presumably security was paid off to turn a blind eye.

Truthers do not have a shred of evidence to fill in any of just those few blanks. Let alone no plane at the Pentagon or Shanksville. If AA77 and UA 93 turned up on the bed of the Atlantic Ocean or buried in Texas that would be "hard evidence" but it hasn't happened.

Another important potential source of evidence would be people confessing to their involvement. The fact that no-one has done so in the best part of 9 years speaks volumes. Please don't tell me they would be afraid to. There must have been many of them and it is inconceivable that not one has become consumed by remorse, become terminally ill, died, got religion, become a drunk whatever.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 06:45 AM by Ridhya
Jeez you guys need to read better...

reply to
post by alienesque


Thats exactly my POINT they're going to prove Israeli mossad was involved but instead of specifying they're going to generalise... the illuminati WANTS majority of Jews wiped out... as well as Muslims and Christians.

reply to post by dereks


The Nazis told them they were for their betterment - what do you think FEMA tells you theirs are for?


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:21 PM by ergonomic 531
reply to post by EndtheFed


Thank you, and the Sons of Liberty agree that the FED should be in the hands of the people, but i must remind you that the "power brokers" who tell the politicians what to do, will do no such thing, via the Supreme Court or otherwise. The people who allowed 911, are the same group who did JFK-RFK-MLK. The NWO runs things now, and have since 1974 - or 1904- take your choice. If you choose to be a revolutionary, be careful who you wage war against. Ergonomic 531


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 04:58 PM by 1SawSomeThings
reply to post by ergonomic 531




Thank you, and the Sons of Liberty agree that the FED should be in the hands of the people, but i must remind you that the "power brokers" who tell the politicians what to do, will do no such thing, via the Supreme Court or otherwise. The people who allowed 911, are the same group who did JFK-RFK-MLK. The NWO runs things now, and have since 1974 - or 1904- take your choice. If you choose to be a revolutionary, be careful who you wage war against. Ergonomic 531


Ergonomic: I don't see, after re-reading EndFed's post, how it got you started talking about revolutionaries in any way, or the NWO running things for however long. And, he was posting about events related to 9/11, not on topic but closer than you were. And your talking about the "Sons Of Liberty" and "waging war", I hope you are not trying to derail the thread, which is about world media's changing reaction to 9/11 truth(?!)
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 11 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 15 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags