Is Congress going to save NASA?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 13-2-2010 @ 12:44 AM by UberL33t

Letter From House of Representatives to NASA Administrator Bolden regarding Constellation contract Cancellation


www.spaceref.com
Dear Administrator Bolden:

We are writing to express strong concern about NASA Headquarters actions and comments regarding the Constellation programs, the programs which together form the human spaceflight programs authorized by Congress in 2005 and in 2008, under Republican and Democrat control, respectively.
(visit link for complete letter)


reply posted on 13-2-2010 @ 12:56 AM by Phage
NASA is not being "disbanded". Hardly. Where did you get that idea? That letter seems to be more concerned with cancellation of contracts than with the space program.

The White House budget would cancel the Constellation program. The reason given is that the project is way over budget and way behind schedule. There are many who believe that it was ill-concieved from the beginning.

The White House said it makes more sense to, rather than work on another Moon landing program, work on long range goals.
The President’s Budget cancels Constellation and replaces it with a bold new approach that invests in the building blocks of a more capable approach to space exploration that includes:

* Research and development to support future heavy-lift rocket systems that will increase the capability of future exploration architectures with significantly lower operations costs than current systems – potentially taking us farther and faster into space.
* A vigorous new technology development and test program that aims to increase the capabilities and reduce the cost of future exploration activities. NASA, working with industry, will build, fly, and test in orbit key technologies such as automated, autonomous rendezvous and docking, closed-loop life support systems, in-orbit propellant transfer, and advanced in-space propulsion so that our future human and robotic exploration missions are both highly capable and affordable.
* A steady stream of precursor robotic exploration missions to scout locations and demonstrate technologies to increase the safety and capability of future human missions and provide scientific dividends.

www.whitehouse.gov...



reply posted on 13-2-2010 @ 10:01 AM by Phage
reply to post by UberL33t


No.
The guidelines are for commercial operations by others (Bigelow, Branson, et. al.). I think.


[edit on 2/13/2010 by Phage]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^