posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:11 PM
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Well the fact it did on 911 proves you wrong, you think the sky's red too? lol
LOL that is not a good argument. That's like saying Jesus is real because the Bible says so.
There is no proof that any building on 911 fell from natural causes, do you not even understand the argument that's been going on for ten years?
No building has ever, or can ever, fall into it's own footprint from asymmetrical damage and fires. Pancake collapse can happen, but none of the WTC
buildings show evidence of this. They all show that there had to be another energy acting on them in order to overcome resistance and momentum
conservation. So no you can not include them in the 'no building has fell into its footprint, or steel building globally collapse, from fire'.
C'mon man get a clue and go learn something before you attempt to blindly dismiss it. You're no different to the other OSers, you support the OS
first and then try to find argument to support your belief. Pretty much the same way the NIST report was created, find a reason for a pre-decided