PROOF that Building 7 was demolished with explosives!!!, page 116

reply to post by Cassius666

---

Yes, less than 00.1% of all architects, in the world, are part of AE911T. Problem is, there are more people entering those professions each year than AE911 has gathered in nearly a decade. On a relative scale, they're becoming more and more insignificant. Oh, and NIST's results are actually taught in schools. used by actual As and Es, and are proven to improve fire resistance.

reply to post by 000063

---

What is your point. What has the number of active architects to do with anything? There are even more active soldiers, so what?

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by 000063

---

What is your point. What has the number of active architects to do with anything?

The point is pretty clear, here, Cassie my good man.

1. Very few of our nations fine engineers, architects, and building professionals have or want anything to do with AE911truth.

2. Those that do sign the petition are not required to perform any analysis or study of the towers whatsoever. They are only giving their own uninformed opinion, most likely after seeing a long presentation by Richard Gage, who just bought them lunch.

3. If so many architects and engineers are against the NIST report, why don't they write their own?

reply to post by DrEugeneFixer

---

1. Very few of our nations fine engineers, architects, and building professionals have or want anything to do with AE911truth.

Your opinion and not a fact.

2. Those that do sign the petition are not required to perform any analysis or study of the towers whatsoever. They are only giving their own uninformed opinion, most likely after seeing a long presentation by Richard Gage, who just bought them lunch.

Another opinion, not a proven fact. “Uninformed opinion”? What was these experts’ uninformed opinion?
Perhaps you mean that these experts did not buy into the lies of the OS, is this what you meant?

3. If so many architects and engineers are against the NIST report, why don't they write their own?

They have, and apparently you never read any of their technical papers on the subject.
Here search the archives, you will find many papers done by these experts.
www.ae911truth.org...

Apparently there is so much ignorance still being demonstrated by so few.

reply to post by impressme

---

Well one AE911truth member is a kitchen fitter ! that has been posted before also a lot of the supporters DONT have any construction experience and many that comment on here DONT either.

With regards to the actual structure and what happened, I would be looking at structural engineers opinions NOT architects because most architects DONT get involved with STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS! they pass this to structural engineers!!!!!

I am on site most days on projects costing a few thousand £ to others costing many millions of £, any structural engineeer that I have spoken to does not see what AE911truth think they see.

Its getting like the apollo hoax believers, the methods they come come up with for it NOT being done as we saw are more complicated to do thats whats really funny about what they claim.

reply to post by bubusmells

---

Minimal damage done to the surrounding buildings? LoL! Take a look at the preclean up pictures again. You appear to have forgotten what they looked like.

reply to post by wmd_2008

---

Well one AE911truth member is a kitchen fitter ! that has been posted before also a lot of the supporters DONT have any construction experience and many that comment on here DONT either.

Members of NIST were caught lying publicly about 911, I am sure some members of NIST have other professional jobs besides being an Engineer. As far as anyone commenting on here, this website is for everyone, not just for people who have a license to do construction.

With regards to the actual structure and what happened, I would be looking at structural engineers opinions NOT architects because most architects DONT get involved with STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS! they pass this to structural engineers!!!!!

Good then you can start right here.
www.ae911truth.org...

I am on site most days on projects costing a few thousand £ to others costing many millions of £, any structural engineeer that I have spoken to does not see what AE911truth think they see.

If that is the case, let me know who they are so, I don’t invest in any of their work such as buying any of these Engineers building designs, “wouldn’t want their building coming down on me,” because they lack logic and common sense.

Its getting like the apollo hoax believers, the methods they come come up with for it NOT being done as we saw are more complicated to do thats whats really funny about what they claim.

I suppose a very small group does, however in my opinion people in search for the truth to 911 don’t believe in that kind of nonsense that you are trying to compare the 911 Truth movement to.

reply to post by impressme

---

Well its very strange with your high opinion of architects, WHY do you think I get asked for help from THEM when they want to use structural fixings you know the things that hold up structures and components on structures, why do they ask little old me to RECOMMEND,INSTALL and then TEST them , ah that's right to cover their A***S

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by 000063

---

What is your point. What has the number of active architects to do with anything? There are even more active soldiers, so what?

edit on 13-6-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)

Well lets see if it's as obvious as some on here claim that the collapse of the building's were suspicious why don't we have thousands upon thousands of Architects but far more importantly STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS!!!!!! saying something.

Why mention soilders wtf has that to do with it you could have said burger flippers there would be more of then as well! Judging by the understanding of construction and the physics of this event we have a few commenting on here!

reply to post by wmd_2008

---

When you know your wrong, result to ridicule.....

Burger flippers lol Cool Story Bro.

reply to post by Vanishr

---

If you look closely in the first 7 seconds as the building collapses, look at the bottom left hand corner, you can see all the windows on the corner blowing out one by one, extremely fast, literally as if theres an explosion going upwards from the bottom of the corner support.

Windows failure is NOT PROOF of explosives!

Windows often fail as building becomes unstable and begins to twist - the forces exerted on the window frames
shatter the windows or cause the frames to be popped out of the openings

It is one of things FF are taught to look for as indication building is now toounstable and too dangerous to enter

9/11: Criminal Incompetence and Ass-Covering by the Bush Administration
  Posted 14 days ago with 12 member flags

Why the Pentagon?
  Posted 3 days ago with 12 member flags

NEVER FORGET 9-11….Maybe we SHOULD forget.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags

Personal Theory on The Twin Towers Plane Pilots
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags

The 9/11 Hijackers: Fraud in Official Video Exhibits Uncovered
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags

Note from trapped workers surfaces 10 years after 9/11
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags

Ultimately the question of the origin of the funds is of little practical significance.
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags

Where were you when the world stopped turning...
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: