Originally posted by Namaste
The videos themselves explain that without an intention behind the gestures they are simply gestures. The symbols are useless without you giving them some sort of power. So in essence all the sheep chanting "Rain Man" are doing just that, saying "Rain Man." It is a useless gesture when the meaning behind the symbolism remains occult. However, once the meaning has been illuminated in the individual there is an intent. Whether that intent be conscious or unconscious.

So here's my question; why are you spreading this to people? Why make them aware of a meaning behind the symbolism, thus giving the symbol power? Am I wrong in saying it would be best for people to remain ignorant to the meaning of the symbol so that the symbol remains a meaningless gesture?

Originally posted by gheybayten
tv is for suckers. i never upgraded to digital. feel free to watch all the commercials you want. count me out.

Originally posted by patent98310
Hey rain man you here? I'm trying to sell my soul too, can you get me a MV8800 an MPC5000 and a full studio hook up?
alright cool.
umbrelle-elle-elle-elle-ehh...

Originally posted by mryanbrown

The symbols more than likely pre-date Egyptian mythos and probably came to be during the early Anglo Saxon pagan religions or Antediluvian age. Around the same time as the Monad. As for a specific symbol? Which are you referring to.

My first hand experience is being raised in an environment which was a hybridization of Wicca and Lucifarianism. My parents were involved with it for several years.

As for the definition. Hidden. Their power is obtained from illumination to the hidden knowledge being perpetrated against those who are unaware. That is how the power works. If you are ignorant, you consent ignorantly.

The meaning I took from the video is that by themselves they are meaningless. But they are being used in context with clear intent. Giving them power, and feeding from those consenting to give praise to that power.

We are all aware of the meaning subconsciously. These symbols invoke that. When you hear a singing praising alcoholism, hedonism, homosexuality, murder, drugs, anarchist views and PRAISE those. You are perfectly aware what you are praising is negative. You have consented to give praise to the negative. Even if you aren't aware of how it will be used. You offered it tribute.

Originally posted by Namaste

Originally posted by mryanbrown

The symbols more than likely pre-date Egyptian mythos and probably came to be during the early Anglo Saxon pagan religions or Antediluvian age. Around the same time as the Monad. As for a specific symbol? Which are you referring to.

My first hand experience is being raised in an environment which was a hybridization of Wicca and Lucifarianism. My parents were involved with it for several years.

As for the definition. Hidden. Their power is obtained from illumination to the hidden knowledge being perpetrated against those who are unaware. That is how the power works. If you are ignorant, you consent ignorantly.

The meaning I took from the video is that by themselves they are meaningless. But they are being used in context with clear intent. Giving them power, and feeding from those consenting to give praise to that power.

We are all aware of the meaning subconsciously. These symbols invoke that. When you hear a singing praising alcoholism, hedonism, homosexuality, murder, drugs, anarchist views and PRAISE those. You are perfectly aware what you are praising is negative. You have consented to give praise to the negative. Even if you aren't aware of how it will be used. You offered it tribute.

So how is it that they pre-date Egyptian mythos (3150 BC+/-) but came to be during Anglo-Saxon period(400 AD)?

So if you have an understanding of the Occult. Riddle me this; who is Lucifer? To make this clear, I am merely asking. Please refrain from assuming I myself am a Luciferian, or anything of that nature.

Originally posted by mryanbrown

Truthfully I feel s/he is neither. I believe Lucifer balances the equation. The Monad. Male and Female. Good and evil. All aspects combined in perfection. Reborn continuously throughout history to find the balance.

Originally posted by Namaste

Originally posted by mryanbrown

Truthfully I feel s/he is neither. I believe Lucifer balances the equation. The Monad. Male and Female. Good and evil. All aspects combined in perfection. Reborn continuously throughout history to find the balance.

That being said; it is commonly accepted that many Illuminati members are Luciferian in nature. What exactly is wrong with that then? Is it wrong for some pop-culture icons to wish to bring a balance? Or even better; Light?

Originally posted by mryanbrown

Who said they wish to bring balance? Grossing millions while nations starve and atrocities are committed without consent is not balance. I fail to see how consistently touting hedonism brings "light".

Balance may only be obtained through the consent of equal individuals. 1:1 even if subconsciously. And while I have no qualms about exploiting the hedonistic nature of those who choose to consent. I do have an issue when innocence sheds blood. Balance is lost.

The balance has been disturbed. So he is here now. Not to save the illuminated as they have hoped. But to pass judgement against them. The innocent never cross lines. The other half however, cross without consent disturbing the balance. As such they must be judged and balance restored.