It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who are we going after next?

page: 3
0
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2004 @ 08:46 AM
link   
Who's Next?
Should the Shrubery Administration be re-elected(Judicialy Appointed), the next Target will be the Dissidents within our own boarders. Since Dubya has already been acting as if he had some mandate from the voters he will try to consolidate his base by silencing(jailing) the opposition.




posted on May, 31 2004 @ 09:03 AM
link   
ever think the US will be its own victim next? You guys have so many enemies right now...including your own people. But its ok, whereever you guys decide to send 19 year old trigger happy teens...im sure it wont make a difference. The thing that pisses me off most is when you guys are going to get nuked or bombed chemically....and the effects make its way north to us Canadians....watch who sides with you after that



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 09:55 AM
link   
I'd say a Naval blockade is on the cards. A year before the recent Iraq invasion US Prepositioning ships started arriving at a port near me. The US Navy had not visited the area for nearly ten years so this was a strange event. After a cover story of the crews needing R and R, they practised invasion procedures with the UK Royal Navy. As you may know Pre-positioning ships are integral to invasion.

Now, two years on and with no further US Navy visits during this period, two more US Navy ships have turned up, this time they are guided missile destroyers. After the usual Rand R they are conducting exercises with the RN in an area known for ASW exercises. (Ask any former Soviet "Fishing Trawler" skipper).

So possibly, in about a year, if not sooner, look out for a blockade in the Persian Gulf.

zero lift



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 10:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by zero lift
Now, two years on and with no further US Navy visits during this period, two more US Navy ships have turned up, this time they are guided missile destroyers. After the usual Rand R they are conducting exercises with the RN in an area known for ASW exercises. (Ask any former Soviet "Fishing Trawler" skipper).
zero lift


Edit as per Seekerof:excessive quote.

Interesting that you mention ASW, I wonder if the reports of Iranian subs might have something to it?

[Edited on 6/1/2004 by Duke_Nukem]



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Lythium - unfortunately it appears that you have been misguided in your interpretations of reality.
First of all you fail to realize that the Illuminati powers rule ALL of the industrialized world. They are not limited in their control by geographical borders. The same people that rule France or England or Australia also rule the USA.
The only reason a war is created (example WWI, WWII) is to serve some deep underlying agenda. It is the Hegelian dialectic in its purest form.

Third world nations are intentionally kept down and portrayed as enemy states simply by what the centralized media spews forth. The elitist controlled IMF and World Bank are nothing more than front organizations that make certain these nations remain at the lower end of the food chain and through their twisted policies, they ensure that third world status is all they will ever know. It is also somewhat coincedental that a fair number third world countries contain either abundant levels of natural resources and/or they are strategically located geographically.

Don't kid yourself - mostl of the weaponry and military hardware that trades hands in this world does so through American companies . So wouldn't you say that in the end the US military-industrial-globalist elites create their own enemies simply to fool the general US public into believing the need for perpetual war and a military force that is completely unnecessary? They don't give a s#*& how many American men and women are killed as long as their plans are fulfilled. I would have to say that if your country was imperialist in nature, then this would fit nicely!

And your comments on Canada only serve to reflect your level of absolute ignorance and intellectual ineptness and is all too often the typical sterotype that most world citizens find with your kind.

Have a nice day!



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 02:45 PM
link   
Duke Nukem, It's certainly interesting that the US are suddenly under going exercises in the NATO ASW training area. During the Cold War ASW was the major role of the Royal Navy (troop/logistics convoy escort for NATO in a European War) and the RN became very good ASW instructors for other nations, including the pre-1979 Iranian Navy. It'll be interesting if these US/RN exercises become a regular feature, just like the Cold War days.

One interesting fact. When the first US Destroyer was recently travelling up Channel to near where I live, a strange aircraft appeared flying CAP. It flew in a circle, west of me, flying overhead of my house at 12 minute intervals. It was not a fighter, more like a large executive jet. The CAP was quite low, about 5,000 ft asl.


zero lift



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 02:54 PM
link   
The USA won't invade Iran unless they want to lose.

I rather think that China and Russia will come to the aid of Iran, they do after all supply them with weapons and nuclear reactors.

China is increasingly looking towards the Middle East to supply its energy needs and isn't likely to react favourably if the USA grabs control of a 3rd country. (Kuwait, Iraq, very friendly with S.A.).

North Korea is unlikely as they have nukes and a very large military, plus they have no oil.



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 06:49 PM
link   
lol, with Bush getting hammered in the press on Iraq and an election coming soon, there is no way in hell the US will invade Iran. After the election anything is possible but, it ain't gonna happen this year. I'd be willign to bet a thousand ATS points on it, if that is possible??

Variable



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 09:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soli
ever think the US will be its own victim next? You guys have so many enemies right now...including your own people. But its ok, wherever you guys decide to send 19 year old trigger happy teens...im sure it wont make a difference. The thing that pisses me off most is when you guys are going to get nuked or bombed chemically....and the effects make its way north to us Canadians....watch who sides with you after that


I agree. Much of the world would love to see the US go down hard. When it comes down to it, and America starts stepping into more # than it can handle, watch how many people either step back and let it happen, or join in the fight against us. It won't be pretty. Actually, it'll be far worse than WWII, I imagine. The US is already the new, modern day communists. But, there's never been a more powerful nation to try to take down, so it's going to be one hell of a fight. Time to find an uncharted island to move to, eh? Call me when the world's biggest super power is done #ing up.



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 09:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by TenPin
The USA won't invade Iran unless they want to lose.


thats the funniest thing Ive read tonight...it was a joke...right?



posted on May, 31 2004 @ 10:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Duke_Nukem
Iran may have been behind the information used to go after Saddam.
Iran may have missiles ready to Nuke us.
Iran continues plans to build their reactor.
Syria may have Iraq's WMD's.
Syria has sanctions imposed on them.
Syrian personnel at the North Korean train blast.
North Korea......

More and more information, stories, are coming out all the time now regarding the above items and more. What smoking gun would we need to go after the next target? After the wonderful way we have gone about the "War on Terror" would anyone even believe any proof that the U.S. Government supplied?

This information needs to investigated, but, what should the responce be if in fact it proves to be true?

[Edited on 5/29/2004 by Duke_Nukem]



posted on Jun, 1 2004 @ 03:41 PM
link   
North Korea-No, its to close to China and we dont want to give up Taiwan to ROC.

Iran-No, the country is too close to self imploding, and its very possible that Isreal might go after the nuks in Iran.

Syria-No, she seems to harbor and support all kinds of WOT groups and should be delt with in time.

Saudia Arabia-Yes. I think that the kingdom is in real trouble and will fall before the US election.


johboy



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join