It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who are we going after next?

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 29 2004 @ 01:57 AM
link   
Iran may have been behind the information used to go after Saddam.
Iran may have missiles ready to Nuke us.
Iran continues plans to build their reactor.
Syria may have Iraq's WMD's.
Syria has sanctions imposed on them.
Syrian personnel at the North Korean train blast.
North Korea......

More and more information, stories, are coming out all the time now regarding the above items and more. What smoking gun would we need to go after the next target? After the wonderful way we have gone about the "War on Terror" would anyone even believe any proof that the U.S. Government supplied?

This information needs to investigated, but, what should the responce be if in fact it proves to be true?

[Edited on 5/29/2004 by Duke_Nukem]




posted on May, 29 2004 @ 02:00 AM
link   
Dunno, but I wouldn't be suprised about the death or capture of Osama shortly before election time, though.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 02:01 AM
link   
I think north korea should be on that list too for the fact that they make it public that they are making nukes and missile that could reach the united states



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 02:29 AM
link   
Wherever there are reserves of oil and gas you can bet the mighty US military will be stopping by.
Just look around and everywhere you see US military involvement there is some strategic reason for the US in being there. It all boils down to the oil companies and their private 'for hire' personal armies.

Don't worry - the spin doctors running the show will convince the majority of trailer park zeros that there are such things as 'terrorist' or 'WMD's in order that their blatant disregard for sovereign nation states is accepted....all in the name of 'homeland security'. They can piss off!

Seems they always go after third world wastelands as opposed to civilized industrial countries as this would never fly as reason for their interference.
Can you see them going after Germany or France or Holland? Why don't they go after Israel as they are the biggest terrorist outfit in the game. Oh yeah....I forgot....it is they that run the US!

Maybe Canada?
Oh they can't do that as long as the Queen Mum is the figurehead.
But if the Canadians decide to dump the connection to the British monarchy......look out!



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 02:29 AM
link   
With all the stories coming out about Iran having submarines with nuclear weapons and the US navy being deployed, I think its probably going to be Iran.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 02:29 AM
link   
Is some of the information true? None of it true? Is this what's really happening or is this the smokescreen for the next move?



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 02:57 AM
link   
I predict Iran precisely because of the info being leaked (whether true or not) and because the Bush administration definately does not want a militant Muslim government in Iraq. Besides that, I have a hunch that the powers that be have been dying to take on Iran for a long time now. Beyond those meager observations, I'm only going on pure, gut, instinct.
joey



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 04:37 AM
link   
The most legitimate targets in any so-called war on terrorism are the criminals in the Bush administration. Whoever "we" is would be doing the world a favor in getting rid of them from office.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 06:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
The most legitimate targets in any so-called war on terrorism are the criminals in the Bush administration. Whoever "we" is would be doing the world a favor in getting rid of them from office.


again with this stuff?...dont you have anything better to do then bash?



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 06:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix
again with this stuff?...dont you have anything better to do then bash?



That's a good question to ask the so-called "president". What about the domestic economy, and health and education, and genuine electoral reform, and starting to repair foreign relations.

It seems to be a matter of perspective.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 06:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar

Originally posted by BasementAddix
again with this stuff?...dont you have anything better to do then bash?



What about the domestic economy, and health and education, and genuine electoral reform, and starting to repair foreign relations.



the economy is getting better...he trys to do good in regards for health care...but congress keeps blocking it...same with education...and as for foreign relations...the only countrys that we have problems with are fair weather friends to begin with...our loyal allies are still our allies...and the rest will come asking for help when they need it...like usual...



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 06:44 AM
link   
I think the next target will be the first nation to step out of line.
If any one of them do something bold and aggressive...or if solid intelligence comes out about a link to terrorism....that nations butt will be in the fire, either diplomatically, economic sanctions, or millitary action.
My top pick would be Syria. They could be more easilly isolated.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 06:57 AM
link   
iran may have "helped" in our decision to go after iraq maybe? so syria is probably next. isnt there a pipeline that could go through there that is being built?

yeah i know is a prop site
www.antiwar.com...



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 08:25 AM
link   
Well im not sure who is next of the list. I think America is trying to aviod a full out war with North Korea due to the fact that it might turn into a nuclear war. Iran is another likely target, but another war with a middle eastern state isn't a wise idea.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 08:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by infinite
Well im not sure who is next of the list. I think America is trying to aviod a full out war with North Korea due to the fact that it might turn into a nuclear war. Iran is another likely target, but another war with a middle eastern state isn't a wise idea.


Agreed that it would not be a great idea but the situation may arise that the Administration feels it has no choice, either from an overt act or evidence it uncovers.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 08:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by ShadowXIX
I think north korea should be on that list too for the fact that they make it public that they are making nukes and missile that could reach the united states


North Korea might have nukes? Jesus! At least we can get the good ol' pure US of A to mess with them.

Having nukes, sheesh...



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 08:33 PM
link   
I think the best bet, would be to bite the bullet, and build a big fat military base right on the persian gulf. Maybe at Kuwait, that way be right there for Iran if they want some.

And by "fat base", I'm not talking something like Guantanamo Bay. I mean *PHAT*. About the size of Vermont. Underground facitlies, nukes, naval base, massive air fields, 5-6 hundred thousand troops, the whole shabang.

Fund the whole thing with oil money.

No more of this farting around, when we done with Iran, if someone else wants some, bring it on.

And if there is a God, they will dedicate the base to Michael Moore. That would be soooooo sweet, would love to see the look on his face as he pauses the food shoveling for a millisecond.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 09:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Merovingian
Wherever there are reserves of oil and gas you can bet the mighty US military will be stopping by.
Just look around and everywhere you see US military involvement there is some strategic reason for the US in being there. It all boils down to the oil companies and their private 'for hire' personal armies.

Don't worry - the spin doctors running the show will convince the majority of trailer park zeros that there are such things as 'terrorist' or 'WMD's in order that their blatant disregard for sovereign nation states is accepted....all in the name of 'homeland security'. They can piss off!

Seems they always go after third world wastelands as opposed to civilized industrial countries as this would never fly as reason for their interference.
Can you see them going after Germany or France or Holland? Why don't they go after Israel as they are the biggest terrorist outfit in the game. Oh yeah....I forgot....it is they that run the US!

Maybe Canada?
Oh they can't do that as long as the Queen Mum is the figurehead.
But if the Canadians decide to dump the connection to the British monarchy......look out!


You win the "Biggest moron on the face of the earth" reward.



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar

Originally posted by BasementAddix
again with this stuff?...dont you have anything better to do then bash?



That's a good question to ask the so-called "president". What about the domestic economy, and health and education, and genuine electoral reform, and starting to repair foreign relations.

It seems to be a matter of perspective.


Repair foreign relations with who?

Our economy has grown faster since the fall of 9/11 and corperate scandels then in the history of our country. Not to mention Bush was stuck with the bubble and BS economy clinton left behind which was bound to fail eventually. Did you know clinton enabled North Korea to build its nukes? Oh lets keep bashing bush when it was Clinton who could have gotten UBL a long time ago but figured hey if we just bomb one camp they will leave us alone... Bush has been given the failing foreign and dmoestic policy that clinton left behind but continue to live in your shoe.

My guess is your either a child or extremely ignorant to the way the real world is today.

[Edited on 29-5-2004 by Raphael]

[Edited on 29-5-2004 by Raphael]



posted on May, 29 2004 @ 09:24 PM
link   
The name-calling stops NOW.

Got it??



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join