I believe I can settle this argument over the right to travel, and I will use a Washington State Supreme Court Judge's Decision to do it. Read what
this Judge has to say about the "right to travel": I apologise for the ccp here folks, but this is just too important not to post!
"If ever a judge understood the public's right to use the public roads, it was Justice Tolman of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
Justice Tolman stated:
"Complete freedom of the highways is so old and well established a blessing that we have forgotten the days of the Robber Barons and toll roads, and
yet, under an act like this, arbitrarily administered, the highways may be completely monopolized, if, through lack of interest, the people submit,
then they may look to see the most sacred of their liberties taken from them one by one, by more or less rapid encroachment." Robertson vs.
Department of Public Works, 180 Wash 133, 147.
The words of Justice Tolman ring most prophetically in the ears of Citizens throughout the country today as the use of the public roads has been
monopolized by the very entity which has been empowered to stand guard over our freedoms, i.e., that of state government.
The "most sacred of liberties" of which Justice Tolman spoke was personal liberty. The definition of personal liberty is:
"Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its
inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted
to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private
property...and is regarded as inalienable." 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987. "