It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A 12-year-old girl fighting to divorce her 80-year-old husband in Saudi Arabia is to receive legal assistance from the Government in what could become a test case for banning child marriage in the kingdom.
The girl was married to her father’s cousin last year against her wishes and those of her mother. It was reported locally that the marriage was sealed with a dowry of 85,000 riyals (£14,500) and consummated.
The girl’s mother filed for divorce but withdrew her case without explanation this month.
This is the first time that the Human Rights Commission has intervened publicly in such a case.
The draft law is expected to establish a minimum age for marriage of between 16 and 18. As a short-term measure activists are pressing for the Government to ban notaries from sealing marriages of girls under 18.
Waiting for the apologists to jump in.
Originally posted by moocowman
the females are considered mere chattel then marrying these children is merely institutionalized pedophilia.
If I'm honest, I'm not at this point sure whether the Koran instructs the age of the girls to be married but it is quite clear that the Prophet Mohamed set a precedent which to my mind makes Mohamed a pedophile.
It was reported locally that the marriage was sealed with a dowry of 85,000 riyals (£14,500) and consummated.
However on Monday in a court in Buraidah, in Al-Qasim province, the girl dropped the case. "I agree to the marriage. I have no objection. This is in filial respect to my father and obedience to his wish," she said according to Saudi media
Originally posted by getreadyalready
I work for Child Support Enforcement and we have a conundrum of policy. A 15 year old can be the legal guardian of a baby, and yet they cannot speak for themselves legally regarding any contracts or decision making???? They can solely make decisions for a baby that they cannot make for themselves???
Originally posted by whitewave
Originally posted by getreadyalready
I work for Child Support Enforcement and we have a conundrum of policy. A 15 year old can be the legal guardian of a baby, and yet they cannot speak for themselves legally regarding any contracts or decision making???? They can solely make decisions for a baby that they cannot make for themselves???
This is not entirely true. Someone who has birthed or sired a child has legally become emancipated as an adult.
In cases of child rape or incest, the resulting offspring usually becomes a ward of the court and the molested minor has a court-appointed guardian until the age of maturity (18) in which case emancipation does not apply.