Good find. I can't wait to see what the final answer is on this one. It would be so cool if true , someting like that would raise alot of eyebrows in the sheeple...not to mention opening a whole new can of worms!

s&f

The "face" on Mars is nothing like a face, except in blurry photos taken at a specific time of day from a certain position. David Wilcock is full of it.

Update:

I'm doing the maths now...

[edit on 9-2-2010 by davesidious]

[edit on 9-2-2010 by davesidious]

It is a gateway. Barak walks out of the nostril and meets with leaders of Galactic Communism.

If this is also going off the Greenwich Time-Zone and Equatorial Zone for triangulation, then as both planets were formed long before these even came into existance (and are a human concept anyway) either the odds are astronomically co-incidental. Or its simply someone who's trying to make 2+2=5.

You could theoretically say a certain feature on Mars lines up with the Taj Mahal, or the Pyramids, or any other manmade structure on Earth. The fact is it'll simply be co-incidental.

It's not only Washington D.C. that lines up in the same pattern as cyndonia. Tikal in guatamala, Stonehenge in england, The lost temple in the city of babylon, and all these site's not only are laid out just like the pattern on MARS but they match the stars in the sky with the plieades and other sun-like stars

Thehiddenrecords.com

sure - you mean this?



or that?



maybe you have to turn it around?



What a ......BS!

I think it's extremely sad that ATS has gone from discussing various findings brought forth by it's members to flaming any OP that brings forth things they find interesting.

In the last few months I've noticed this shift in the collective ATS community. And to be honest, I'm getting pretty tired of it. What happened to discussing what is being brought forth, providing alternate theories, ect?

I see everyone saying how this find is BS, how the OP or David Wilcock are full of it or whatever, but I have yet to see ANYONE OF YOU actually DO what the OP has asked. Have any of you actually checked what the OP asked you to check? To see if Wilcock's theory might be right?

I can't even begin to figure out how to check the math or I would do it myself.

S&F for the OP for bringing this forward for discussion. For all those that flammed the OP, I can only wish there was a way to detract your ATS points for being total and complete trolls rather than actually contribute to the discussion.

Originally posted by RecentlyAwaken
To see if Wilcock's theory might be right?

So where is the maths he worked it all out from on his website? All he has to do is post it, so people could see.

Ugh, I didn't ask of your opinion on David Wilcock. I know that 99% of what he says is based off his "dreams," so I'm well aware that everything he says is meant to be taken with a grain of salt. What I was asking is if there's any evidence that all these things line up, since davesidious is right in that Wilcock didn't provide any evidence. However, it is ATS's motto to deny ignorance, and to say "Well lol, he didn't provide proof, so that makes it untrue no matter what! Why should we try to confirm or deny it? XD" is stupid. I can't confirm it myself since I'd probably not account for something, so I'm hoping somebody advanced in this can confirm or deny Wilcock's claims.

It's pretty simple really. Go on Google Earth, you can look at Mars too. Find the things you are comparing. Since we cannot really say where is zero degrees longitude on Mars, all you can compare is the latitude. Mars has an Equator, zero degrees latitude, and North and South poles, ninety degrees latitude.

Other than that, how do you mean places are "lining up" with stars?