reply to post by SeekerofTruth101
The game is brinkmanship.. except this is brinkmanship in front of a cliff edge.. and it is all to easy to fall off!
And I feel you are wrong with the Neville Chamberlain, he represented the will of the people.. the will of the people was neither peace or war, hence
the confused, hypocritical polices that ruled the day, which I feel is replicated in today's politics, The people where behind Chamberlain as they
are Obama in seeking neither peace or war.
The Political, Economic and Militaristic landscape now is very similar to the pre war era... and if you where in Iran's place would you not have
spent the last decade thinking paranoid thoughts that you are next.. would you not have spent the time investing in something to keep up your sleeve
just in case.. I know I would. Hence why I would not under estimate their capability... You might be right and I might be over estimating the threat,
but I would rather be over prepared than under prepared.
lets just hope that no one falls off the cliff edge with this game of brinkmanship as it might get very messy.. Not because of Russia but because it
will open the door to the other opportunist nations that might suddenly want to sort out any long standing issues they might have with their
neighbours, which will really mess the global markets up.
As you say.. I hope the Iranian people sort this out before it get to the stage of patriotism obscuring reason.
[edit on 8/2/10 by thoughtsfull]