It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sarah Palin - God loves SOME retards.

page: 2
17
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by iMacFanatic
reply to post by Fromabove
 


He could be a conservative who is not blinded by palin's snow job of the right. They do exist ya know.


I don't think so. he reads the Huffington post and listens to NBC for news, and can't understand satire meant to insult hypocrisy in the white house. A normal person can understand how a word is used and meant. Ans so far as I now the snow can be found at the white house these days.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:34 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Fromabove
 


I don't even own a TV.

I barely read HuffPo.

I also read Drudge (much more frequently).

Sarah Palin is hardly conservative... she's a bull# artist. And a political monster.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:38 AM
link   
reply to post by seethelight
 



She's not the only one. Why only point out one sides problems?

That's a serious question. I feel that if someone is going to sit around and post threads about one person's hypocrisy, they should do the same to the other side, or the side that they support. Otherwise, it's hypocrisy all over, and party politics. The same thing that has this country in the crapper.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:38 AM
link   
reply to post by seethelight
 


Is name calling the norm with democrats? Anyway, I will be voting for sarah Palin if I have to write her name in. I will be on the front lines doing my part to get a conservative congress and Senate this year.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by seethelight
 



She's not the only one. Why only point out one sides problems?

That's a serious question. I feel that if someone is going to sit around and post threads about one person's hypocrisy, they should do the same to the other side, or the side that they support. Otherwise, it's hypocrisy all over, and party politics. The same thing that has this country in the crapper.


This is the best statement of the day. Doing so would show good character in both major parties.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:45 AM
link   
reply to post by Fromabove
 


Don't come to my side agreeing that we need to get along when your rhetoric is just as divisive.

I don't know you, so you may really believe this and this thread got the best of you, but both of you two have used the same rhetoric used to divide.

I'm not trying to start a fight, rather taking my own advice and calling both sides out. It'd be rather hypocritical to not.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:49 AM
link   
Another high point in the political life of our favorite authoritarian political porn star.

This must have been one of the most hateful things she has said up till now.

See my thread on Sarah Palin's biological teleprompter and how that worked out for her here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Also, you will find an analysis of what exactly she had to write down... There's a link to a high res-photo where you can see it for yourself.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by Fromabove
 


Don't come to my side agreeing that we need to get along when your rhetoric is just as divisive.

I don't know you, so you may really believe this and this thread got the best of you, but both of you two have used the same rhetoric used to divide.

I'm not trying to start a fight, rather taking my own advice and calling both sides out. It'd be rather hypocritical to not.


I didn't say that I agree with you on anything and no, I'm not coming to your side, but, when something is said that is right, it needs to be known, and what you said was correct. I don't like it if my best friend is doing it, yet, I do have a political preference and it is not with the democrats.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 09:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Fromabove
 


You're kidding right?

This isn't deep...

If that was true, our country would've disintegrated years ago.

Humans can't be perfect, no #, but they can be held accountable when they are scum.

The Republicans, in other words, should walk away from EVERY moral stance they claim to have (to win over "values voters") until they get rid of every closeted homosexual, every pedophile, every racist, every crook, etc. etc., in their rank... riiiiight?

Life doesn't work like that.

We all choose sides.

If I HAD to criticise all corrupt politicians, individually, I wouldn't have the time to criticise any...

oh wait... now I see what you're doing.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 09:36 AM
link   



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 09:46 AM
link   
reply to post by seethelight
 


It's not about criticizing all politicians in the way you are making it sound.

It's about being honest about it. Here's what happens:
Palin does something stupid, the Liberals and those who don't really follow politics but say what others say are like "zomg she is so stupid...porn star..blah blah blah"

Then Obama does something, the conservatives and those who dont really follow politics say things like "zomg he is so stupid, hates white people, is a socialist, and isn't even a citizen"

Both are equally retarded.

Each time I see these threads on ATS it's upsetting because 99 times out of 100 it's going to be a bash, or attempted bash on the other side.

Having different political values is fine. Spending all your time pointing it out and bickering white not working with the other side is retarded.

Make no mistake...the party politics is not solely because some rich people said I'm a republican or I'm a democrat, but rather because they know it polarizes the country because we are that ignorant. We want the divide. It's on TV becaues it makes money. Stop playing the game and it will have to end.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 09:51 AM
link   
MOD NOTE:

Stop the personal attacks, name calling, circumventing censors with bad language and keep to the TOPIC: Sarah Palin - God loves SOME retards not each other!

Mod Note: Courtesy Is Mandatory – Please Review This Link.

Mod Note: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.


[edit on February 8th 2010 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by TXRabbit

Originally posted by Fromabove
I want Sarah Palin to be President. The one we got now is incompetent, unqualified, inexperienced, and too self absorbed.


Please explain how Palin is competent, experienced and giving. Explicit examples are appreciated.


Still waiting on your response.

THanks



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 10:23 AM
link   
don't ya think pol pot had it right? kill all the intellectuals? aren't they the ones that got us here?

give us *snip* a crack at the world.


what can you say? we would start wars? lol, like we need a DA to do that,

all tho pot went above and beyond he sure set the country on the path he wanted.

if you can't see what i'm getting at, i don't want a politician running this country.

i would take anyone with common sense.

Mod Edit: Removed profanity circumvention. No swearing, OK?


[edit on 2/9/2010 by seagull]



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by lordtyp0
 


Hey thanks for that Palin link it would have totally passed me by otherwise. Palin reminds me of that famous beauty contestant clip, where she couldn't string a coherent sentence together.


Who ever it was that mentioned that Palin is being groomed to be a new Reagan is on to something.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 12:26 PM
link   
oops new 'puter double post

[edit on 8-2-2010 by spookfish]



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 12:36 PM
link   
More proof Republicans are actually completely insane.

Enough said.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 12:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by expat2368

Originally posted by David9176
NO INTEGRITY WHATSOEVER.

NONE.



I assume you are referring to Zero the muslamocommunist idiot you probably voted for?


why would you assume that?
The OP is about Palin... therefore, I would assume thats who they are talking about.

and I wouldn't be so quick to judge who someone else voted for... there were more than two options... I voted, but not for either of them...



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 12:52 PM
link   
I find it interesting that the media is dubbing Palin as the leader of the tea party movement.......what better way to remove credibility from and destroy a movement than to make a loosleaf feminist the head of it.




top topics



 
17
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join