Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Pentagon + Global Hawk = 911 attack

page: 1
11
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:11 PM
link   
Having stated in the past that I believe the Pentagon was hit with an aircraft of an unknown type I have an opinion as to what I think it was. Based on photos and other evidence including SecDef at the time, Don Rumsfeld who keeps on spilling the beans...gotta love him for that! Seriously though I think its strange that he himself has validated two theories, flight 93 shot down & a missile strike into the Pentagon.



Above, photo still blown up to show clear smoke trail.



Above shows the "V" shaped tail section of a Global hawk flying after impact.



Above still frame from Pentagon camera and outline of Global Hawk just prior to impact.



Above is the outline of what looks very much like the aft section of a Global Hawk.



Above, painted up to fit into the plan anyone who see this traveling at full speed isn't going to recognize it for anything except a commercial airliner. Why? The colors and the human mind thinking it saw what it really didn't.



The picture above shows how large the GH really is. Many think its just a small unmanned drone.

A reporter asked Don Rumsfeld a question. Below is his answer.


Question: This is a question that's been asked by many Americans, but especially by the widows of September 11th. How were we so asleep at the switch? How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?

Rumsfeld: There were lots of warnings. The intelligence information that we get, it sometimes runs into the hundreds of alerts or pieces of intelligence a week. One looks at the worldwide, it's thousands. And the task is to sort through it and see what you can find. And as you find things, the law enforcement officials who have the responsibility to deal with that type of thing -- the FBI at the federal level, and although it is not, it's an investigative service as opposed to a police force, it's not a federal police force, as you know. But the state and local law enforcement officials have the responsibility for dealing with those kinds of issues. They [find a lot] and any number of terrorist efforts have been dissuaded, deterred or stopped by good intelligence gathering and good preventive work. It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.


DoD transcript archive

Don Rumsfeld went on to say later in 2004 that flight 93 was shot down as well.










[edit on 7-2-2010 by mikelee]




posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikelee
Above is the outline of what looks very much like the aft section of a Global Hawk.


Looks nothing like it!

You of course the 757 sized damage done to the exterior wall, the 757 engines found inside the pentagon, the 757 wheels, the 757 undercarriage etc. Also all the body parts identified from flight 77



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:26 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


Your funny!

It looks very much like it and I have a question for you...Why is it that in almost every picture all of that supposed "evidence" is always placed on top of those piles?



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikelee
Why is it that in almost every picture all of that supposed "evidence" is always placed on top of those piles?


It is not of course, and how do you explain all those 757 parts inside the pentagon, and no Global Hawk parts at all

also
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 7/2/10 by dereks]



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikelee
Your funny!
It looks very much like it and I have a question for you...Why is it that in almost every picture all of that supposed "evidence" is always placed on top of those piles?


I give up.

Was it maybe to be able to identify it? Can you come up with a way to properly identify various sized pieces of debris without pulling them from the rubble?



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:32 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


Your assuming that the OS is true, which it isn't.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:34 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


It is not of course, and how do you explain all those 757 parts inside the pentagon, and no Global Hawk parts at all

also
www.abovetopsecret.com...


That thread and the information was debunked years ago.
No 757 hit the pentagon. The OS is a proven lie.





[edit on 7-2-2010 by impressme]



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:35 PM
link   
reply to post by COOL HAND
 


One photographs evidence in its original place as it fell, landed or was placed at the crime scene. You never photograph it then present that as proof unless you wish to answer 1000 questions regarding tampering with evidence.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
That thread and the information was debunked years ago.
No 757 hit the pentagon. The OS is a proven lie.


wrong again, it was not debunked, it proves a 757 hit the Pentagon. You still avoid the question how 757 wheels, undercarriage, engine etc and body parts from Flight 77 were found inside the Pentagon.

They completely destroy you silly conspiracy theory!



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikelee
One photographs evidence in its original place as it fell, landed or was placed at the crime scene. You never photograph it then present that as proof unless you wish to answer 1000 questions regarding tampering with evidence.


As was done with those pictures during the Moussaoui Trial , they were exhibits and not questioned by the defence!



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikelee
One photographs evidence in its original place as it fell, landed or was placed at the crime scene. You never photograph it then present that as proof unless you wish to answer 1000 questions regarding tampering with evidence.


Easy enough to do when your crime scene isn't on fire.

How do you think all that wreckage (conforming to a B757) got there? Was it trucked in after the fact?



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:43 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 



You of course the 757 sized damage done to the exterior wall, the 757


Was a tiny hole, proven 757 could not fit in hole.


engines found inside the pentagon,


You OS believers need to stop making up stories to support the OS lies, only ONE ENGINE was found at pentagon and it was proven it didn’t belong to a Boeing 757.


the 757 undercarriage etc.


You continue to parrot the same lies about the undercarriage being found at the pentagon you have been “confronted repeatedly” to provide PROOF with creditable sources and you have “failed miserable” to produces any evidence to your ridiculous claims.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:44 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


OK dereks, your in pretty much every 911 thread with your obvious hostile tactics so here a question for you:

If the SAME type aircraft hit the WTC towers and the heat melted the steel in those buildings then how did the Pentagon not suffer the same degree of damage and then they managed to pulled out DNA to boot?

If everything was "vaporized" as the official fairy tale goes then how did any survive, after all when things vaporize they go away.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by impressme
That thread and the information was debunked years ago.
No 757 hit the pentagon. The OS is a proven lie.


wrong again, it was not debunked, it proves a 757 hit the Pentagon. You still avoid the question how 757 wheels, undercarriage, engine etc and body parts from Flight 77 were found inside the Pentagon.


BALD FAT LIE. No 758 parts were found at the Pentagon. Parts on display in the Pentagon would not even fit on a 757.


They completely destroy you silly conspiracy theory!


ANOTHER BALD FAT LIE.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:47 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


wrong again, it was not debunked, it proves a 757 hit the Pentagon. You still avoid the question how 757 wheels, undercarriage, engine etc and body parts from Flight 77 were found inside the Pentagon.

They completely destroy you silly conspiracy theory!


Wrong, Put up or shut up! Where is your “credible proof?” let see this evidences?



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:50 PM
link   
Presence of a missile does not prove Pentagon or DOD involvement.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:52 PM
link   


Found at Pentagon. Manufacturer states it isn't one of their APC units without a doubt. But the OS says it is.

Who do I believe?



[edit on 7-2-2010 by mikelee]



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by dereks

Originally posted by impressme
That thread and the information was debunked years ago.
No 757 hit the pentagon. The OS is a proven lie.


wrong again, it was not debunked, it proves a 757 hit the Pentagon. You still avoid the question how 757 wheels, undercarriage, engine etc and body parts from Flight 77 were found inside the Pentagon.

They completely destroy you silly conspiracy theory!


Hello,
To quote; "wrong again, it was not debunked, it proves a 757 hit the Pentagon. You still avoid the question how 757 wheels, undercarriage, engine etc and body parts from Flight 77 were found inside the Pentagon."

Would you mind providing a link to that information so that I may learn how you've come to that conclusion? Thanks in advance.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:53 PM
link   
reply to post by aristocrat2
 


Never said it did.



posted on Feb, 7 2010 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
Was a tiny hole, proven 757 could not fit in hole.


Truther lie 1, itcould fit. Here truthers have no mixed up the measurements on a 757


it was proven it didn’t belong to a Boeing 757.


Truther lie 2, it was a a RB 211 engine from flight 77


You continue to parrot the same lies about the undercarriage being found at the pentagon


Truther lie 3, pictures have been posted here many times of 757 wheels and undercarriage, yet some people refuse to look at them as they know it destroys their silly conspiracy theory!
www.aerospaceweb.org... shows it was a 757 wheel found at the Pentagon






top topics



 
11
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join