It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For anything to travel from Kapustny to Balkash in 24 minutes, it had to fly at a speed of three miles a second. That’s 180 miles a minute or 10,800 miles an hour. If the reports were indeed true, the Topol RS 12 or the Topol SS 27, as it is known in military circles around the world, had to be the fastest thing man has ever seen.
Originally posted by Violater1
reply to post by tauristercus
Your analysis, as usual, is impeccable.
Star and Flag.
Jokingly, the magnification looks like the inside of a mouth, with visualizing of the uvula.
Maybe G_D is yelling at us.
Originally posted by corvin77
wow, you must really be interested in this spiral to have gone to all that trouble.
Thanks for the incredible research and calculations!!!
I for one had a very hard time swallowing the missile story, in your opinion, could this spiral have been a projection of some sort, either from the ground or from a satilite? or even a combination of the two???
Reason I am asking, is that I have been wondering about the claimed false flag alien invasion for a while now....could this have been a test run to see if the projectors actually work.
Also in the videos, there seemed to be laser lines in the clouds as you would get with club laser shows, just an observation from someone that hasnt really taken the time to look into this phenomenon!
Thx again! S & F
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by tauristercus
How did you find out the locations of the video stills in GE? The video is hand-held, wobbling considerably, and continually being zoomed in and out. The slightest movement when portraying something hundreds of kilometres away is going to introduce some staggering errors.
Also, an ICBM in its boost phase can be travelling at about 7 km/s, or 15,700 mph. I don't know what your margin of error is for your YouTube-to-Google-Earth mapping, as you didn't state it, so I don't know if that falls within it.
The smudges in that over-enlarged photo are smaller than the encoding blocks from the original, rendering them very likely complete compression artifacts. I'm not saying that's definitely what is shown, but it's a compelling (and far more simple) explanation.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by tauristercus
In the photos, at that range, the missile would be less than a pixel across. Also, from the alignment of the spirals, we'd be looking at the missile from nearly the end-on, meaning it would not be cylindrical, but round. I really can't see how we can read anything from such an inaccurate source as a heavily-blown up JPEG. I do applaud your efforts, though.
As for calculating the speed of the missile, I think using one video is not going to yield the most accurate results. The time line on a YouTube clip is only down to the nearest second, and from what I know about flash video delivery (which I do for a living, so a fair bit) timestamps are far from accurate.
I'd love to agree with you, I really would. The level of research you've performed is staggering in its intensity, but I feel you are stacking statistical error upon error, which magnifies the margin of error fantastically.
Originally posted by Violater1
I found this Russian complex on GE,
65 18 08.59 N 40 59 34.04 E
It appears that this complex has a semi circular buried track approx 3.5 miles long.
And maybe an semi circular antenna array 65 17 20.39 N 41 00 49.01 E
The end of the last segment of track is very close to the trajectory of the spiral.
[edit on 7-2-2010 by Violater1]