The Internet-Soon to be Self Aware., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times
Topic started on 7-2-2010 @ 03:05 PM by jinx880101
I just had to share bit of fascinating (and equally freaky) bit of information with the lot of you. The article is from April '09, so I was surprised that it hasn't been posted on ATS yet.

So, I'm just gonna get right down to it....

In engineering terms, it is easy to see qualitative similarities between the human brain and the internet's complex network of nodes, as they both hold, process, recall and transmit information. "The internet behaves a fair bit like a mind,"


How might this manifest itself? Heylighen speculates that it might turn the internet into a self-aware network that constantly strives to become better at what it does, reorganizing itself and filling gaps in its own knowledge and abilities.


How might this manifest itself? Heylighen speculates that it might turn the internet into a self-aware network that constantly strives to become better at what it does, reorganizing itself and filling gaps in its own knowledge and abilities.


So, don't get this all wrong now...Surely, humans need to be involved in order for this to go ahead, it's not doing it all on it's own.
Apparently, if we are eager enough this could happen within the next 10 years. I'm not quite sure what all of this means but I have mixed feelings about it. With all the good comes the bad...and technology is awesome and everything, but I don't know if I want a machine running the world...(not that people are a fantastic job at it at the moment )


In any case, here is the
link if you would like to read further.


[edit on 23/01/2010 by jinx880101]


reply posted on 7-2-2010 @ 03:12 PM by hautmess
Originally posted by jinx880101 but I don't know if I want a machine running the world...(not that people are a fantastic job at it at the moment )


In any case, here is the
link if you would like to read further.


[edit on 23/01/2010 by jinx880101]


last time i checked the internet is already running the world.

At least the internet would be aware and want to 'improve', unlike the government entity which isnt looking for improvement. we clearly need a lion tamer for this beast of humanity that exists today.


reply posted on 7-2-2010 @ 03:16 PM by jinx880101
reply to post by hautmess







we clearly need a lion tamer for this beast of humanity that exists today.

Wait, you're right....!

You should read some of the comments on that link, they are pretty interesting.
And thanks for the reply, was quite a laugh



reply posted on 7-2-2010 @ 04:37 PM by SaturnFX
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Well,if it does, it will be the most "sentient being" to ever exist. I mean, look at all of the information that has been placed with it in just the past five years!! Wow.


One thing human nature has shown us, is that "tons of information" does not equate to "common sense".

How do you program "Understanding"?

Of course storing information in a database is something we can easily do today.

But who would even have a clue what the math formula for "understanding/common sense" is? No scientist or group of them today is that advanced.

Let's not overestimate ourselves here. We are still somewhat primitive in our OWN understanding and common sense to even get it right in the first place.



Define first off the difference between understanding and processing/storing.

What is common sense also..common sense is not some abstract concept, its things like, dont stick a fork into a electrical outlet....pretty sure a computer program can figure that one out


Our ego is the only thing that is different than a computer (currently), and that might be our "soul"...but a computer can do and mimic everything us humans can do, and arguably for the same reasons we do also...well, not your little laptop mind you, but soon enough, sure.

Eventually there will be programs that pass the turing test, and it will continue to get more advanced even after that...

The philosphy of this is getting dated now, but yes, every arguement has been made about how man will always be different than machine, and every arguement has been debunked into little more than a egotistical wish verses a reality...even down to "they will never sneeze beyond just to mimic verses a necessity....wrong...well, wrong conceptually...we get a virus, our virus deleters make us sneeze...they have a more efficient way of getting rid of their bugs.


reply posted on 7-2-2010 @ 05:18 PM by muzzleflash
reply to post by SaturnFX



I consider common sense the ability to determine if something is likely to be true or if it is likely to be false.

For example if I told you, "The forest has trees which are in reality a ghost of Ezkihad" or some made up junk, YOU would know I was just throwing words together to purposely make no sense.

However the AI would not know which way to go. Should it take me literally and assume I believe in strange things, or should it assume that I am just "pulling its leg" so to speak, and trying to be funny?

And how will an AI even know what is funny anyways?

A true AI can make original and very funny jokes. This is indeed a extremely difficult and complex thing to program.

How will an AI determine if something is "weird" or "funny"? These are the questions that have us stumped right now. It could take decades to begin to understand it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^