AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Board Business & Questions discussion forum.  (rss)


When one thread closes another one opens.


<<  1    2  >>

Topic started on 6-2-2010 @ 05:22 PM by Novise


Maybe we put too much value on the big threads. The concept of the thread-killer has always bothered those who think they are one. It just means it's time for a new line of thought. A new thread. It doesn't stop the discussion or the thinking. It just means somebody else needs to post a new thread. A new idea to keep the discussion going is what is needed. Threads come and threads go. Lets stop basing the value of our inputs on our thread lengths! If a thread gets very long, that's good for the site, sure, to that end. But don't let it worry you if your thread is short. Some people are good at starting threads and some are good at adding to them.



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Board Business & Questions topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 05:27 PM by lagenese


Values and concepts rely on the phenomena of doubts and beliefs. We should expand our topics, to not be closed minded about the same subjects over and over again. There is so much to discuss, exchange...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 05:31 PM by Sinter Klaas


I think you are completely a 100 % right.
This also allows other members to build on their ATS points.

Only posting other threads is taking way to long to get 5000 of them points.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 05:42 PM by liquidsmoke206


anyone wanna help out with my last 2 threads...I got 1 reply between the 2 of em!! And i thought they were both pretty good.

check my profile and bump those muthers!!


thanks guys!



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 05:46 PM by silent thunder


The thread that can be posted in
is not the eternal thread.
The moniker that can be registered
is not the eternal moniker.

The un-posted is the eternally real.
Posting is the origin
of all particular threads.

Free from desire for stars and flags, you realize the mystery.
Caught in desire for stars and flags, you see only your post count sinking.

Yet posting and threads
arise from the same source.
This source is called "the black ATS background."

Darkness within darkness.
The gateway to all understanding.

-Tao Te Ching, ATS edition



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 05:57 PM by Novise


reply to post by silent thunder



Haha perfect! And to anyone else, thanks. I can't star the posts anymore. So that is for that. I'm not being political here, I understand ATS rules and have no problem with them. I was just saying personally, don't be bothered if you don't have a huge thread, or seem to "kill" them. I have like 1000 posts and don't have a big thread for instance.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:11 PM by SaturnFX


Sorry, I never really understood (lack of reading) the value of points or anything...do I get a check in the mail or something?

I tend to post things that I think merit a discussion..sometimes I post decent ones, sometimes not so great...but if I find I did something already out there, I try to stop it from progressing and link right at the top to the original thread...redundancy is bad.

Now, something that has been going on for like years and is hundreds of pages long...might deserve a new post of the summery to date, so people dont get completely lost...but that should be after a certain amount of posts...say once you hit 20 pages, your capped and should be opened as a new thread with the original post posted and a update based on the last thread

we could also simply do away with the point system (unless of course I will be recieving a free subscription to ATS magazine once I reach 10k points) and not worry about people posting crap just to get points verses add to the dialog...

just my thoughts



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:12 PM by Signals


Originally posted by silent thunder
The thread that can be posted in
is not the eternal thread.
The moniker that can be registered
is not the eternal moniker.

The un-posted is the eternally real.
Posting is the origin
of all particular threads.

Free from desire for stars and flags, you realize the mystery.
Caught in desire for stars and flags, you see only your post count sinking.

Yet posting and threads
arise from the same source.
This source is called "the black ATS background."

Darkness within darkness.
The gateway to all understanding.

-Tao Te Ching, ATS edition


Brilliant!

Remember everyone-

(excuse me while I reference a tired cliche')

It ain't the size of the ship, it's the motion of the ocean




   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:34 PM by Novise


One thing that will happen is that i meant this to be a philosphical thread. A play on how when one door closes another opens. Now it's moved to board business and people with long threads are going to take offense and perceive me as a "has not" that is only complaining. I don't have a problem with anyone who has brought these to the site. It's just a line of thought, a flow I had, that I wanted to post... And when looked at in terms of board business, it becomes something else altogether.

Just like in an MMORPG. Ever played one that died away? You see a world come and go. Things change, all things are impermanent, this really wasn't meant to be about board business... unless we have entered the paradigm shift (Edit: not Imma, but prema) prematurely, in that case it wont make a difference.

[edit on 6-2-2010 by Novise]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:37 PM by IntastellaBurst


Don't feel bad if your threads don't blow up. Often times the dumbest or most inflamatory threads get the most attention.

Perhaps some threads do not grow because we just wrote them TOO well, .... and there is nothing else to add.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:40 PM by schrodingers dog


reply to post by Novise



Hi Novise ... I'm trying to understand what it is exactly you are suggesting or inquiring about. When a member creates a thread he/she has no control over the level of interest their OP/topic is going to generate, or how many folks will decide to participate.
And from what I've observed staff is quite lenient as far as allowing threads on a similar topic but with a different 'twist' to them. Even if an identical thread topic has already been explored in the past, if it has been inactive for a while they will also let it be.

It is true that when one door closes another one (or many for that matter) open(s) ... perhaps you can give us an example of the issue and what it is that you suggest as a remedy.

[edit on 6 Feb 2010 by schrodingers dog]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:46 PM by SpeakerofTruth


Originally posted by IntastellaBurst



Perhaps some threads do not grow because we just wrote them TOO well, .... and there is nothing else to add.


I have made some threads that got a lot of posts. Most of them haven't. Even the ones that have gotten quite a few replies are only about 7-8 pages long. I might have one or two that have 10 pages, but that is very unusual.

I liken it to the fact that a lot of times I start threads on things that people really can't say much about. If there is anything of significance to say about the given thread, I tend to say it in the initial post. It's sort of self-defeating, I suppose.

I have been here almost four years and I have seen members come and go simply because they felt they didn't get the attention they "deserved." It seems to be an ego thing to me. *SHRUG*



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:48 PM by Novise


reply to post by schrodingers dog



Well it's really something obvious that should go unsaid, but people post a thread and then maybe get only a few replies, or they end a thread with a good post. No replies to them, they feel they may not have felt what they said was valuable. That's not always the case. There is nothing you or anyone can do to make them realize what they offered was valued and read, maybe stars, but it was. Only them being aware that replies and thread length do not dictate value... But that is understood. This was meant as an exersize.

Edit: so what do we take from that? It just means the line of thought has ended and it's time for another one. A new conversation, a new situation.

[edit on 6-2-2010 by Novise]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 06:56 PM by schrodingers dog


reply to post by Novise



Ah ok ...

Not taking things personally is always imho the wiser approach. One does their best ... how others choose to respond, or not respond, is beyond our control. If one is looking for personal validation through the reaction of others to their thoughts, ATS and indeed life will be a succession of disappointments and suffering.

There is nothing you or anyone can do to make them realize what they offered was valued and read, maybe stars, but it was.


Well I often send a note of appreciation to members who's contribution has had an impact on me. With the above noted caveat in mind, on the rare occasion that a member decides to do likewise to me, I have also appreciated it.

Edit for clarity.

[edit on 6 Feb 2010 by schrodingers dog]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 08:46 PM by whaaa


reply to post by Novise



I chose topics that interest me from reading the news; usually American politics. Some are controversial and meant to elicit a response from other members. I invariably know who is going to respond to my threads, both for and against what ever question or premise I pose. A lively passionate debate is healthy.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 08:57 PM by LadySkadi


Erm... if I based my value on my thread length, I'd be in trouble!



Good thing I know what I'm really worth!




   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 09:02 PM by schrodingers dog


Originally posted by LadySkadi
Erm... if I based my value on my thread length, I'd be in trouble!


27 or so replies per thread authored from thee is very good ... if one were counting.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 09:15 PM by LadySkadi


reply to post by Novise

One thing that will happen is that i meant this to be a philosphical thread. A play on how when one door closes another opens. Now it's moved to board business and people with long threads are going to take offense and perceive me as a "has not" that is only complaining. I don't have a problem with anyone who has brought these to the site. It's just a line of thought, a flow I had, that I wanted to post... And when looked at in terms of board business, it becomes something else altogether.


Too bad the thread got moved, perhaps alert a Mod. to the original intent of the thread and see what can be done? I do understand where you are coming from, philosophically and I think it a cool concept for a thread.



reply to post by schrodingers dog


Kind of you to say, thank yoos!




   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 09:18 PM by seattletruth


reply to post by Sinter Klaas



Really? Just post some new threads if you want points flags.. Try to post ones that are breaking news or new paradigms...

I only joined a month before you and I'm at 35,000..

not that the points mean anything.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 11:45 PM by mishigas


reply to post by Novise



At one time, ATS had a column that showed the number of "views" of a thread.

It was another way of measuring interest in a thread. It was taken away because ... I forget why.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>






























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 0.133 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]