Originally posted by randyvs
I was going to ask, do you mean the monarchy, or the democracy?
The original Atlantis was a monarchy, however I believe the system I have invented is based adequately on what would most likely have been the ideal alternative to their own system. I believe that, prior to the end of the last ice-age, global-scale government fell because it was too centralised.
Originally posted by randyvs
What's to debate? I think it sounds like great alternative to all that one this, one that, we are B.S. We are not one. I am that I am and we are are always many never just one.
Yes, well then you may be disappointed to learn the Constitution of the Executives uses an adapted version of the "law of one," that being that the original law is there is no law. Thus, to know that law is to understand all the others.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Wasn't Atlantis, according to the myth's originator Plato, a corrupt and tyrannical military dictatorship diametrically opposed to the only variety of democracy in the world (that being the Athenian Republic)?
According to Aleister Crowley that account holds true also. His description in Liber 51: the Lost Continent (read online here: www.sacred-texts.com... ), he describes essentially the same pre-deluvial world as would later be discovered to have been described by the Sumerians many millennia before. All sources agree on the pantheist nature of the monarchical oligarchy.
Originally posted by randyvs
That's some deep shizzle right there.
I rarely get the oppurtunity to do this directly and in public when I receive a compliment: THANK YOU. I'm glad you enjoyed looking over it! That means alot to me. Thanks.
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
In order to propose a form of global government and request discussion of global governance alternatives to the "NWO" type, is it necessary to come to the conclusion that a global government is what is needed.
To specify again, the POD see global-scale government as "inevitable" but not "necessary."
Originally posted by AwakeAndAware
to set up a base, or whatever reason they would want to make a deal with the island. You can't deal with 185 seperate governments, it's just not feasible. Each tribe would want the base in the area that they control, or want to be the tribe that trades or sells the resources. The rest would certainly war on the lucky tribe picked.
Don't forget to factor in radical reactionaries who would want no base at all, or the fact that it is usually whichever tribe that wins the base-contract that then starts the wars with its otherwise peaceful neighbors.
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
The further "up the chain" the people who exercise this control/power over other people, the less the people have control/power over the restrictions placed on them.
This is a very good point, from my point of view. I'd prefer to be at the "bottom" of the food-chain and free than at the "top" and a slave. I am reminded of the Nirvana song "Serve the Servants" as well as the the Jim Morrison poem-line, "The servants have the power: dog men and their mean women."
Originally posted by TheCoffinman
american democracy is a ponzi scheme like everything else in this country, a scam, a farce, we live in a two-party bankocracy...
Agreed, whole-heartedly. The only "capitalistish" competition there is nowadays is between corporations trying to figure out the best way to screw their customers. This applies between the neo-cons and the neo-libs too. The CFR is employing dialectics to confuse and disempower "we, the people." But then, what can we, the people do about this? This was the kind of thinking that got me started on designing Atlantean Democracy. I hope you all enjoy it.
PEACE.
- Jon


about abovetopsecret.com and it just blown me away
dude, what do you think about it buddy.