It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Amazing collection of NASA UFO footage from missions

page: 1
10
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 11:16 PM
link   
I thought this was absolutely amazing footage in a compliation style video. I think you all will enjoy this one. I did search and did not see where anyone posted this already. Enjoy







posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 11:24 PM
link   
awsome footage.. good find. makes your think hey... why the government keeps all UFO finding and ET discoveries a secret i dont know.. but to me and many others its clear as day were not alone



posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 11:25 PM
link   
We are not alone that for sure. Without a doubt!


Part 2 will make you really convinced after looking at the laptop...You'll know what I'm talking about when you see it.

[edit on 5-2-2010 by mikelee]



posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 11:42 PM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 


G'day mikelee

Here's my intepretation of part 1 (in order):

- ?
- Fuel tank
- Lens flare
- Part of lunar probe
- ?
- Debris
- ?
- Debris
- Debris or film fault
- Water droplet inside cabin
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Reflection
- ?
- Lens flare
- "Hear say"
- ?
- Debris
- ?
- ?
- "Humour"
- Debris
- Debris
- ?
- Apparent change in size / distance is just a change in illumination of a static object
- As above
- "Fair comment"
- Debris
- Ice particles
- Ice particles bokeh effect combined with video scan line effect
- Old favourite......but I hate to say it....ice (I clung to that one for years!)
- Ice particles bokeh effect
- Debris
- ?.......old favourite!
- Debris bokeh effect
- Ice particles

I'll have a look at part 2 in a while.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 5-2-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 11:54 PM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 


first one in part two!!

and what the hell is the last one on part 2???

[edit on 6-2-2010 by carbonblack]



posted on Feb, 6 2010 @ 12:18 AM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 


G'day again mikelee

Here's my interpretation of part 2 (in order):

- Ice
- Ice
- Debris
- Debris
- ?
- ?
- Debris
- Debris
- Ice
- Debris......maybe hoax triangle
- Debris + lightning + bokeh effect
- Debris
- Picture of "flying saucer".....not real
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Lens flare
- Debris
- Debris
- Lens reflection
- ?
- Opinion / hearsay
- ?
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Hair or lint on film
- Insulation
- ?
- Hair or lint on film
- Debris
- Film fault
- Film fault
- ?
- ?
- Debris
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Debris
- ?
- ?
- ?
- Time exposure of something
- Film fault
- Debris
- Debris
- Statement of fact
- Ice crystals + bokeh effect + video scan line effect

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Feb, 6 2010 @ 01:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by carbonblack
reply to post by mikelee
 


first one in part two!!

and what the hell is the last one on part 2???

[edit on 6-2-2010 by carbonblack]


G'day carbonblack

That last 1 on part 2 is out of focus ice crystals subject to the bokeh camera effect, enhanced by video scan line effect, as filmed on STS 75.

I thought it was a "UFO" for years, until I read all the extensive material & ensuing discussion, here on ATS.

Here is a useful link.....there is some great reading in here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

If you want to read more threads, do an ATS search for STS 75 or Tether Incident.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 6-2-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Feb, 6 2010 @ 06:48 PM
link   
I agree to many of what has been listed by other members about what these "UFO's" are in many of them.

Theres a lot of debris up there, and the ones in earth orbit especially can be put down to mainly debris, dust particles etc.

That said though there are a few strange ones indeed that for sure need some further investigation.

The one with the astro in the suit peering through that window with a BIG grin made me chuckle



posted on Feb, 6 2010 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by fuserleer
 


G'day fuserleer

Can you recall which video & what time that was shown?

I'd like to have a look at that again.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Feb, 15 2010 @ 11:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Great link! ...Thanks and Star to ya



posted on Feb, 15 2010 @ 11:28 PM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 


Excellent compilation.

STS 48-D is one of the best pieces of evidence for space serpents, IMO. And for all of you balloon lovers, part 2 has even more evidence of this phenomenon as seen from space.



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 01:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by mikelee
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Great link! ...Thanks and Star to ya


G'day mikelee

You are very welcome.

I'm glad you found that interesting.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not.



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 02:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by mikelee
 


G'day again mikelee

Here's my interpretation of part 2 (in order):

- Ice
- Ice
- Debris
- Debris
- ?
- ?
- Debris
- Debris
- Ice
- Debris......maybe hoax triangle
- Debris + lightning + bokeh effect
- Debris
- Picture of "flying saucer".....not real
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Debris
- Lens flare
- Debris
- Debris
- Lens reflection
- ?
- Opinion / hearsay
- ?
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Hair or lint on film
- Insulation
- ?
- Hair or lint on film
- Debris
- Film fault
- Film fault
- ?
- ?
- Debris
- Film fault
- Film fault
- Debris
- ?
- ?
- ?
- Time exposure of something
- Film fault
- Debris
- Debris
- Statement of fact
- Ice crystals + bokeh effect + video scan line effect

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not


LOL.. Nasa couldnt have explained it better...debri,debri.ice,debri,ice,ice,ice,debri, lens flare..



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 03:27 AM
link   
reply to post by CheifMasterTrollTheHTIC
 


G'day CheifMasterTrollTheHTIC

It would be interesting to know.....

What you thought those things were &.....

Why you thought that

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 03:34 AM
link   
Say what you want about the pictures, you cant deny interviews with actual astronauts......



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 03:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by CaptSplatter
Say what you want about the pictures, you cant deny interviews with actual astronauts......


G'day CaptSplatter

Could you post links to credible sources wherein astronauts have made definitive statements to the effect they have seen alien spacecraft?

That would be very useful, if you could.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 03:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by CaptSplatter
Say what you want about the pictures, you cant deny interviews with actual astronauts......


G'day CaptSplatter

Could you post links to credible sources wherein astronauts have made definitive statements to the effect they have seen alien spacecraft?

That would be very useful, if you could.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



The title of this thread is about UFO's not "Alien Spacecraft" you should read the title if you wish to contribute. Here's link for your viewing pleasure, G'day.

Enjoy!!

Edit opps sorry forgot S&F Mikelee

[edit on 16-2-2010 by CaptSplatter]



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 04:09 AM
link   
reply to post by CaptSplatter
 


G'day CaptSplatter

Thank you for raising the terminology issue pertaining to "UFO's" & "alien spacecraft".

I agree the 2 terms are often considered to be interchangeable, when often they should not be.

It can sometimes be difficult to work around the usage of those 2 terms, here on ATS......I hope I have managed to do that reasonably in this thread.

Thanks also for linking to good ol' mischevious Buzz!

Having looked into that in great detail, I believe it is well proven that his description is of 1 of the 4 flaps of that opened to release lunar module.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 16-2-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 04:20 AM
link   
I'd seen some of these over a decade ago (along with more still!) and some are definitely the real thing -those changing course especially and the formation ones, and then there's the recurring peculiar upper atmosphere 'energy dissipating' phenomena that we see happening en-mass frequently with electrical storms! I think that all these craft are being so0 misinterpreted!



posted on Feb, 16 2010 @ 04:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by CaptSplatter
 


It can sometimes be difficult to work around the usage of those 2 terms, here on ATS......I hope I have managed to do that reasonably in this thread.

Having looked into that in great detail, I believe it is well proven that his description is of 1 of the 4 flaps of that opened to release lunar module.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 16-2-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]


As for the apology, thanks I think...
It is hard for any one person to admit when they were wrong and I applaud your efforts.

As for your investigation into one mans thoughts and beliefs I find it deplorable that you can even be so bold as to offer an opinion on what you think he saw. A mans thoughts and beliefs can never be proven or explored by another human being. It's impossible. All though I appreciate your "opinion" its just an "opinion" nothing based on fact. And we all know about opinions.....

As for your disgrace to a man who was chosen by his country to fly this mission and obviously was a trained professional that is unacceptable. I fail to see how a highly trained astronaut whom has worked with this equipment for months is unable to disern a piece of his spacecraft. I mean when you look in your rear view mirror to back out of your driveway do you think to yourself "what is this reflective thing on the side of my car"? (Don't answer that)



new topics

top topics



 
10
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join