ALERT! - World governments admit to having capability of making tsunamis and earthquakes!!!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times
Topic started on 5-2-2010 @ 04:48 PM by downisreallyup

World governments admit to having capability of making tsunamis and earthquakes!!!



As part of a 1977 Convention in Geneva, the following was agreed to by all signatories, including the United States:

CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES

Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977
Entered into force October 5, 1978
Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979
U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980

At the bottom of a document that was originally presented by the CCD (Convention to Combat Desertification) of the U.N. General Assembly, there were some "understandings" attached, which according to the bottom footnote, were not included in the final official agreement:

“It is the understanding of the Committee that the following examples are illustrative of phenomena that could be caused by the use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II of the Convention: earthquakes, tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones of various types and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer; and changes in the state of the ionosphere.

It is further understood that all the phenomena listed above, when produced by military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, would result, or could reasonably be expected to result, in widespread, long-lasting or severe destruction, damage or injury. Thus, military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II, so as to cause those phenomena as a means of destruction, damage or injury to another State Party, would be prohibited.

It is recognized, moreover, that the list of examples set out above is not exhaustive. Other phenomena which could result from the use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II could also be appropriately included. The absence of such phenomena from the list does not in any way imply that the undertaking contained in Article I would not be applicable to those phenomena, provided the criteria set out in that article were met.”


Source

So, as part of the U.N. goal of fighting against things that produce deserts (desertification), we have an agreement that not only admits to man's ability to change the environment in profound and drastic ways, but clearly prohibits militaries and governments from doing so. Of course, when has something as "useless" as an agreement ever stopped governments from doing what they really want to do?

And who are these people that posted this agreement on their website? None other than the illustrious Federation of American Scientists. If all this talk of man-made tsunamis and earthquakes was actually such "bunk" it is highly unlikely it would have been included in any official U.N. agreement (even as addendum comments), or posted on such a reputable website.

So, whether this recent event was caused by HAARP or some other secret military technology, it certainly is suspicious that Haiti has such a large oil reserve...

Huge oil reserves under Haiti...

Let us never underestimate the lengths that a thirsty oil-consuming giant will go to in order to quench its thirst...


[edit on 5-2-2010 by downisreallyup]


reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 04:57 PM by Chonx
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin



Fair point. But consider the fact that this was in 1977 and how far and fast technology has moved since...

I don't think it's impossible.


reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 04:59 PM by NichirasuKenshin
reply to post by Chonx



Neither do I. But on the other hand, I have never seen compelling evidence for the existence of such technology. Until then, I will call out the misrepresenting of sources in order to support something that is not there.

Impossible it is most certainly not. I live in a world of probabilites, it's up to ATS to convince me.


reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 05:02 PM by NichirasuKenshin
reply to post by win 52



Feel free to provide compelling evidence for your wideranging claims or everyone will assume that you're just a kid with an act.


reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 05:07 PM by Hmmm101
reply to post by Phage



Right.... So why not outlaw other stuff that "Could" be used for Warfare.





reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 05:08 PM by timewalker
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin


What do you think, they advertise top secret weapons? Do you think the Japanese citizens got overwhelming evidence of the ABomb before Monday, August 6, 1945?


reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 05:13 PM by Phage
reply to post by Hmmm101


Because this had specifically to do with environmental modification and it's unknown effects.
en.wikipedia.org...

[edit on 2/5/2010 by Phage]


reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 05:19 PM by NichirasuKenshin
reply to post by Hmmm101



HAARP is not a military project. Visit their site one day, it's interesting stuff that has nothing to do with earthquakes.



reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 05:21 PM by NichirasuKenshin
reply to post by timewalker



No, but lots and lots of people in the US did but did kept their mouths shut, as they had good reasons to do so, an argument that can hardly be made for an alleged large-scale operation conducting ecoterrorism.

Edit: And yet, I don't deny that HAARP has military implications/future applications in the area of communications and SIGINT disruption.


[edit on 5-2-2010 by NichirasuKenshin]

[edit on 5-2-2010 by NichirasuKenshin]


reply posted on 5-2-2010 @ 05:24 PM by NichirasuKenshin
reply to post by win 52




As far as I know no one has ever reproduced the supposed earthquake machines of Tesla, every single attempt I know of was an utter failure.

If you have evidence of such a machine operating and producing repeatable results please inform us, I'd be most interested.

edited for grammar

[edit on 5-2-2010 by NichirasuKenshin]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 17 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 111 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 88 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 54 replies