Just an extra post, if this gets big. For more policies.
[edit on 4-2-2010 by SpiritHipHop]
A Government., page 1
privacy
reply posted on 6-2-2010 @ 11:43 AM by Sinter Klaas
reply to post by SpiritHipHop
No no no !
The freedom to make you're own choices in life. Without acceptance !
Only limiting, the act of violence against our fellow human beings.
This includes , freedom of speech and any other freedom possible in life.
Less regulations, means less regulators. ( police force ) and less crime !
Less rules to break.
No no no !
The freedom to make you're own choices in life. Without acceptance !
Only limiting, the act of violence against our fellow human beings.
This includes , freedom of speech and any other freedom possible in life.
Less regulations, means less regulators. ( police force ) and less crime !
Less rules to break.
reply posted on 8-2-2010 @ 01:01 AM by Sinter Klaas
reply to post by concernedcitizan
Do you mean like mankind accepting they split up into a groups based on a common ideology. and give all these seperate groups a peace of land to live according it.
Always respect others and be satitsfied with what they have.
Do you mean like mankind accepting they split up into a groups based on a common ideology. and give all these seperate groups a peace of land to live according it.
Always respect others and be satitsfied with what they have.
reply posted on 8-2-2010 @ 01:29 AM by concernedcitizan
reply to post by Sinter Klaas
I would advocate the revitalization of the political agenda, emphasizing the practical value of attending to domestic affairs. It does not intend to impress upon other nations any of its own values, whether or not it would appear favorable for the intended recipient of goodwill. Nationalism understands that "form follows function," and moreover, that "function follows values." As values differ, so do political structures. Only an internally-oriented motivating force can result in accepted change. Thus, nationalism proffers that it is the duty of the citizens of each respective country to work towards bringing about effective change in their homeland, advocating thorough constraints on immigration -- another benefit of a culturally homogenous population is that the sense of community and responsibility for one's actions within their community is held in higher regard.
Consequently, corporations which expand beyond borders would be unfavorable; they depend on the exploitation and outsourcing of labor, which is meant to maximize profit for the company while doing little in the way of benefiting society. Smaller companies would result, which would be checked by its employees whose stake in economic and managerial matters will be given greater voice once this association with the locale is established. An unruly business would not be sustained when it relies on the satisfaction members of a surrounding community. This paradigm may be applied to the State.
As part of a desire to place culture first, nation-states would be redivided into nations, or organic populations defined by commonality in language, culture and heritage. These cultures still exist despite a century of onslaught by mass media and corporate interests, but can be enhanced and reconstructed slowly over time by putting more emphasis on culture.
Each culture, whether Jewish or Swedish or Basque or Tamil, would be granted its own historical grounds to rule as it sees fit. That rule would not be subject to oversight by any other groups, or even critique. Each group would be allowed to exist in isolation for the purposes of keeping its people together on the notion of culture and heritage and language as an organic bond that compells individuals toward the same goals and values.
The first step in forming an alternative to modern society is to restore leadership by values and not utilitarian principles (popularity, profit, democracy). We can use utilitarian methods toward this goal, but the highest goal must remain culture, and for culture to exist, it must be isolated in its parallel versions. This form of "blood and soil" government connects people to each other, to tradition and to the land they occupy.
I would advocate the revitalization of the political agenda, emphasizing the practical value of attending to domestic affairs. It does not intend to impress upon other nations any of its own values, whether or not it would appear favorable for the intended recipient of goodwill. Nationalism understands that "form follows function," and moreover, that "function follows values." As values differ, so do political structures. Only an internally-oriented motivating force can result in accepted change. Thus, nationalism proffers that it is the duty of the citizens of each respective country to work towards bringing about effective change in their homeland, advocating thorough constraints on immigration -- another benefit of a culturally homogenous population is that the sense of community and responsibility for one's actions within their community is held in higher regard.
Consequently, corporations which expand beyond borders would be unfavorable; they depend on the exploitation and outsourcing of labor, which is meant to maximize profit for the company while doing little in the way of benefiting society. Smaller companies would result, which would be checked by its employees whose stake in economic and managerial matters will be given greater voice once this association with the locale is established. An unruly business would not be sustained when it relies on the satisfaction members of a surrounding community. This paradigm may be applied to the State.
As part of a desire to place culture first, nation-states would be redivided into nations, or organic populations defined by commonality in language, culture and heritage. These cultures still exist despite a century of onslaught by mass media and corporate interests, but can be enhanced and reconstructed slowly over time by putting more emphasis on culture.
Each culture, whether Jewish or Swedish or Basque or Tamil, would be granted its own historical grounds to rule as it sees fit. That rule would not be subject to oversight by any other groups, or even critique. Each group would be allowed to exist in isolation for the purposes of keeping its people together on the notion of culture and heritage and language as an organic bond that compells individuals toward the same goals and values.
The first step in forming an alternative to modern society is to restore leadership by values and not utilitarian principles (popularity, profit, democracy). We can use utilitarian methods toward this goal, but the highest goal must remain culture, and for culture to exist, it must be isolated in its parallel versions. This form of "blood and soil" government connects people to each other, to tradition and to the land they occupy.
reply posted on 8-2-2010 @ 02:00 PM by Sinter Klaas
reply to post by concernedcitizan
Thank you !
You explained yourself perfect and easy to follow. I really appreciate it.
I think i'm with you on this.
I'm 100 % for bringing communities back to basic values and their own live by their own laws and believes on politics and everyday life.
Most of all the end of international corporations ! Because of the same arguments and opinions in your post.
No more stealing the ability to be a self sustainable economy. This is by any means an act of evil doing. leaving a community powerless to taking care of themselves when disaster strikes. Like drought, failed harvest etc. The opportunity for a disaster is far greater because a community relies on others for their need of basic products for nutrition and other live giving necessities.
It is on it's one important enough to close local economy to big corporate business. the result of closing our borders will also end the influence and a decrease of power to gain and the use of it.
I'll give a party if I'm so lucky to see this happening.
The multicultural society is also an issue. As I see know how Islam is taking a firmly grib on everyday life. When there are more of them spreading their ways and less of us fighting to keep our cultural and political values. They will take over and they will force their ways on us, as their believe and culture will not make a respect an tolerence their way to act to us as we will not be very cooperative to a suppressed way of life.
I don't agree for ending the mixing of cultures all together. As there is also much to gain and learn from other ways of living and seeing life pass by and taking place.
The end of corporates power will also cause this to happen. They are almost always responsible for migrating big number of people t where they are needed as a work force.
I do applaud the resurfacing of loyalty and love for tradition, fellow countrymen and to put this all in front. T be and show your proudness, as you are also responsable for your countries goals and achievements.
These feelings have a tendency for a higher risk of going to far and feeling superior to other countries an their inhabitants.
The first step in forming an alternative to modern society is to restore leadership by values and not utilitarian principles
Here in Europe there is a problem. We have always being ruled by aristocratic families. What has resulted in they are almost all related by blood and thus merging and ending of societies by changing it to 'the liking of the current ideas of the power.
Only France, killed of theirs and the Netherlands were for a time a republic.
Until the same French had a little breakdown letting their freedom again be taken by a ruler. Napoleon Bonaparte. This F*ck wass also responsible for the end of the Dutch Republic when he assigned his brother to to rule and be king.
Present day monarchy we have now. Does not have any reason for being in power. Their journey was and power was taken with lies, fraud and force. Their bloodline filthy after some bastard child of a related German aristocrat. because there were no more of them left to follow up in line, after the king died. King Willem 3 also lacked to create a next generation. and married Emma. who gave birth to our queens grand mother.
There is said king Willem was sterile do to an infection of a sexual decease.
Very stinky family we got in power.
I'm sorry for flowing of topic but these would be difficult to simply return to old ways. And acquire some original solutions I think to be in need of reaching our new way of life.
The new way of living will be a problem for free will I'm ai favor of. Maybe you know some way to making it more present in the community.
Anarchy is over the top but how far can we go ?
Thank you !
You explained yourself perfect and easy to follow. I really appreciate it.
I think i'm with you on this.
I'm 100 % for bringing communities back to basic values and their own live by their own laws and believes on politics and everyday life.
Most of all the end of international corporations ! Because of the same arguments and opinions in your post.
No more stealing the ability to be a self sustainable economy. This is by any means an act of evil doing. leaving a community powerless to taking care of themselves when disaster strikes. Like drought, failed harvest etc. The opportunity for a disaster is far greater because a community relies on others for their need of basic products for nutrition and other live giving necessities.
It is on it's one important enough to close local economy to big corporate business. the result of closing our borders will also end the influence and a decrease of power to gain and the use of it.
I'll give a party if I'm so lucky to see this happening.
The multicultural society is also an issue. As I see know how Islam is taking a firmly grib on everyday life. When there are more of them spreading their ways and less of us fighting to keep our cultural and political values. They will take over and they will force their ways on us, as their believe and culture will not make a respect an tolerence their way to act to us as we will not be very cooperative to a suppressed way of life.
I don't agree for ending the mixing of cultures all together. As there is also much to gain and learn from other ways of living and seeing life pass by and taking place.
The end of corporates power will also cause this to happen. They are almost always responsible for migrating big number of people t where they are needed as a work force.
I do applaud the resurfacing of loyalty and love for tradition, fellow countrymen and to put this all in front. T be and show your proudness, as you are also responsable for your countries goals and achievements.
These feelings have a tendency for a higher risk of going to far and feeling superior to other countries an their inhabitants.
The first step in forming an alternative to modern society is to restore leadership by values and not utilitarian principles
Here in Europe there is a problem. We have always being ruled by aristocratic families. What has resulted in they are almost all related by blood and thus merging and ending of societies by changing it to 'the liking of the current ideas of the power.
Only France, killed of theirs and the Netherlands were for a time a republic.
Until the same French had a little breakdown letting their freedom again be taken by a ruler. Napoleon Bonaparte. This F*ck wass also responsible for the end of the Dutch Republic when he assigned his brother to to rule and be king.
Present day monarchy we have now. Does not have any reason for being in power. Their journey was and power was taken with lies, fraud and force. Their bloodline filthy after some bastard child of a related German aristocrat. because there were no more of them left to follow up in line, after the king died. King Willem 3 also lacked to create a next generation. and married Emma. who gave birth to our queens grand mother.
There is said king Willem was sterile do to an infection of a sexual decease.
Very stinky family we got in power.
I'm sorry for flowing of topic but these would be difficult to simply return to old ways. And acquire some original solutions I think to be in need of reaching our new way of life.
The new way of living will be a problem for free will I'm ai favor of. Maybe you know some way to making it more present in the community.
Anarchy is over the top but how far can we go ?
reply posted on 8-2-2010 @ 02:45 PM by concernedcitizan
reply to post by Sinter Klaas
We are an organic entity as a whole composed of individuals. We respond to rulesets that promote some over others much as we respond to natural selection. When we are thinking of the future and of what beauty can be created, we aspire to a higher standard (ascendancy). When we lack this, we seek to avoid challenge and to affirm more of what we are, even though it may be mediocre, and create a public standard of illusion to protect us (intraversion). Some will use "human nature" to justify stagnation and mediocrity, but in reality, human nature is specific to the individual (some will always try to do what is right, others never will, and most in-between) and human nature can change in a healthy social environment with strong values.
Some people may never change, but these tend also to have other problems adapting to reality itself. At this juncture, we must ask ourselves whether we design a society to produce ever-better people (as we hope to do with our own children), or whether we want to humble us all by focusing on those who are not doing well and put our resources into them instead of rising as a whole. When we set aside our own emotional and fear-driven responses, we see that we would rather exist in a society striving for the better. As such, we will with values systems lead people toward a better way of living instead of wallowing in justifications of inaction and failure like "human nature," a degraded norm, and the like.
Many who are afraid will claim that no change can take place, not realizing that change occurred to bring us to our current state, and that we are agents of choice can make any change we want. What people who express such a belief are communicating, subconsciously, is that they distrust their own ability to make a beneficial change. Much as when we run or ride a bike we steer away from obstacles and toward our path, we are in control every second unless we choose not to be, and in a single second we can create victory or tragic defeat. (Existentialists will note that this variability is what gives meaning to life, in that by avoiding the empty and creating the beautiful, we gain a sense of achievement in conquering not only our own deficiencies but those things we can better in life, feeling the greatest sense of autonomy -- what Crowdists distill to an inferior substitute, "freedom" -- and self-worth in that we have acted not just for ourselves but for a more lasting principle. Crowdists fear death more than anything else, and so are served a life of inconsequential self-pleasing, while heroic and other intelligent personalities seek to overcome the fear of death to do what is rewarding.)
We are an organic entity as a whole composed of individuals. We respond to rulesets that promote some over others much as we respond to natural selection. When we are thinking of the future and of what beauty can be created, we aspire to a higher standard (ascendancy). When we lack this, we seek to avoid challenge and to affirm more of what we are, even though it may be mediocre, and create a public standard of illusion to protect us (intraversion). Some will use "human nature" to justify stagnation and mediocrity, but in reality, human nature is specific to the individual (some will always try to do what is right, others never will, and most in-between) and human nature can change in a healthy social environment with strong values.
Some people may never change, but these tend also to have other problems adapting to reality itself. At this juncture, we must ask ourselves whether we design a society to produce ever-better people (as we hope to do with our own children), or whether we want to humble us all by focusing on those who are not doing well and put our resources into them instead of rising as a whole. When we set aside our own emotional and fear-driven responses, we see that we would rather exist in a society striving for the better. As such, we will with values systems lead people toward a better way of living instead of wallowing in justifications of inaction and failure like "human nature," a degraded norm, and the like.
Many who are afraid will claim that no change can take place, not realizing that change occurred to bring us to our current state, and that we are agents of choice can make any change we want. What people who express such a belief are communicating, subconsciously, is that they distrust their own ability to make a beneficial change. Much as when we run or ride a bike we steer away from obstacles and toward our path, we are in control every second unless we choose not to be, and in a single second we can create victory or tragic defeat. (Existentialists will note that this variability is what gives meaning to life, in that by avoiding the empty and creating the beautiful, we gain a sense of achievement in conquering not only our own deficiencies but those things we can better in life, feeling the greatest sense of autonomy -- what Crowdists distill to an inferior substitute, "freedom" -- and self-worth in that we have acted not just for ourselves but for a more lasting principle. Crowdists fear death more than anything else, and so are served a life of inconsequential self-pleasing, while heroic and other intelligent personalities seek to overcome the fear of death to do what is rewarding.)
reply posted on 8-2-2010 @ 08:07 PM by Sinter Klaas
reply to post by concernedcitizan
Nicely said !
I do believe change is possible.
My own values are a simple reminder, why !
If I can have values, I even failed to discus them with some.They just did not understand up to a point when I was called liar.
There are probably a lot of people with the same ideas.
Well... I,m not a goody two shoe. A few flaws make up for the changed for the better ones. I f they are even better.
The balance is way of but. still mainly self centered.
As some say narcism is a flaw. However by deffinition it it has nothing to do with me.
Maybewe are indeed on a breaking point in evolution.
New age crap. Is still all about a higher state.
Who knows ?
As for human flaws. A perfect human doen't exist !
So.
Nicely said !
I do believe change is possible.
My own values are a simple reminder, why !
If I can have values, I even failed to discus them with some.They just did not understand up to a point when I was called liar.
There are probably a lot of people with the same ideas.
Well... I,m not a goody two shoe. A few flaws make up for the changed for the better ones. I f they are even better.
The balance is way of but. still mainly self centered.
As some say narcism is a flaw. However by deffinition it it has nothing to do with me.
Maybewe are indeed on a breaking point in evolution.
New age crap. Is still all about a higher state.
Who knows ?
As for human flaws. A perfect human doen't exist !
So.
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Marine fatally shot in his car by police in front of his two young daughters
Other Current Events, Posted 4 minutes ago
Other Current Events, Posted 4 minutes ago
Money is not ruling in Middle East , we don't want those pieces of paper.
US Political Madness, Posted 6 minutes ago
US Political Madness, Posted 6 minutes ago
Obama defends tax hikes, proposes more job training in new budget
Breaking Political News, Posted 16 minutes ago
Breaking Political News, Posted 16 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
I'm 24 and I feel Doomed- A rare Case - 28 reported Worldwide
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 25 flags
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 25 flags
Israeli diplomat's car in India hit by blast
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 16 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 16 flags
Greece : vote AGAINST the ``enslave all Greeks to the banks`` bill and get kicked out of government
Global Meltdown, Posted 16 hours ago, 14 flags
Global Meltdown, Posted 16 hours ago, 14 flags
Frozen continent! Europe's rivers, lakes and even seas are iced over
Fragile Earth, Posted 12 hours ago, 14 flags
Fragile Earth, Posted 12 hours ago, 14 flags
Israel Blames Iran Of Bombings In India, Georgia
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 7 hours ago, 10 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 7 hours ago, 10 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Israel Blames Iran Of Bombings In India, Georgia
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 7 hours ago, 73 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 7 hours ago, 73 replies
Is Nicki Minaj flagging that the ILLUMINATI killed Whitney Houston, at the 2012 Grammy???
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 17 hours ago, 55 replies
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 17 hours ago, 55 replies
Israeli diplomat's car in India hit by blast
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 51 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 51 replies
Notre Dame Faculty to Obama: ‘This Is a Grave Violation of Religious Freedom and Cannot Stand’
Breaking Political News, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies
Breaking Political News, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies
I'm 24 and I feel Doomed- A rare Case - 28 reported Worldwide
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 47 replies
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 47 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.204 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.204 seconds
