Last I heard, it was 70,000 "picocuries", per liter. Of course, they don't point out that a picocurie is 1*10^-12 curies meaning the amount in the
water was 0.00000007 curies per liter. And the "safe" limit is a completely arbitrary number. By my math, your body is about twice as radioactive as
1 liter of this water (1.3706e-7/7.0000e-8=2) in terms of disintegrations per second, and furthermore tritiated water passes out of the body
relatively quickly if you drink a fair amount of water.
The reactors are hardly aging either. The longer operating them the more experience is gained, and the safer they become. Most have perhaps another 25
years in them.
Whose is the idiot that designed a nuclear power plant with underground pipes.
My understanding is that the plants were originally built with underground pipes, that can be difficult to access. Many of these pipes have since
been replaced in function by above-ground pipes, but leaving some parts of underground pipes unaccessible. Water can also leak through some concrete
buildings. Obviously any leaks should be stopped ASAP, but is a relatively small amount of tritiated water a health risk? No, unless people are
drinking it in concentrated amounts all the time. Last I heard it had not reached any water supplies, and even if it did it would become even more
diluted. Also, it's great that new designs do not have any pipes set in concrete.
Very stupid if the utility misled the public though, even if it was an honest mistake! It gives themselves a bad reputation, no matter how small the
problem is in reality. I can understand why he was fired. I think it's unlikely the license will be extended, but then again, closing the plant would
be a
very bad mistake for Vermont, IMO. Let's for forget that is has passed inspections with "high marks", and supplies a
huge
portion of Vermont's generating capacity. What will replace it? GAS I presume?
Thanks.
[edit on 5/2/2010 by C0bzz]