PSU Investigating Professor's Comments, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times
Topic started on 4-2-2010 @ 04:25 PM by captaintyinknots

PSU Investigating Professor's Comments


www.kptv.com
PORTLAND, Ore. -- Portland State University is investigating a professor for comments he made about one of his students in his economics class.

A student in the class said Professor John Hall went on a rant, singled out a student and said the student worked with the FBI. The student filed a complaint afterward.

Elden Rosenthal, the student's attorney, said Hall told the class that the student worked for the FBI and carried guns on campus.

"I think it was unethical for him to do it in front of an entire class," said student Harry Stanwood.

The student in question released a state
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 04:45 PM by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by searching4truth
How do you the prof is correct and just not off his rocker? Second, I did find it interesting that the FBI "had been aware" of Hall's rant. Are they always notified when one person accuses another of working for the FBI? And who notified them? Maybe the student called in and said he'd been outed in front of a class full of people.

"I have never been an informant for the FBI." Could be true, have you been an agent?

I had a prof followed by the FBI for communist activity, and he was a big commie he'd tell ya that in the first 2 minutes of a conversation it was no secret. Yet they insisted on following him bc of his "secret". I know my prof was jumped after being a guest speaker, they said it was two students, but no one recognized the supposed the students and our classes were small so you did know everyone. I always that was fbi related as well.


1)The Prof identified specific actions, and claims to have evidence of the 'student' in question attempting to recruit and organize a violent protest, including teaching people how to make molative coctails in 69 different ways.

2)There was no rant. It was a calm, informative approach.

3)I dont beliieve he works for the FBI. FBI agents tend to be smarter than going around openly recruiting.

4)This is the second time this has happened to the prof.

5)There will supposedly be 2 years worth of investigation released by Hall before this is over. A 2 year investigation tells me that he found enough to keep investigating.


reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 05:00 PM by getreadyalready
1. I have many FBI friends, and they are investigators. Nothing more, nothing less. The furthest possible extent of a conspiracy connected to the FBI would be a lack of investigation (9/11, Kennedy, etc.). FBI agents are not recruiting or going anywhere incognito, or planning any violence, unless the said violence is a secret hope that some scumbag resists arrest!

2. Universities are indeed full of foreign nationals, fringe groups, and recruiters of all kinds. In my 10 years at this university I have personally witnessed people being recruited to do violence, sex, pornography, foreign service, CIA, military, corporate espionage, and probably 100 other things that I have already forgotten about!

3. The professor is an idiot for handling something this way. Either he has legitimate concerns which should have been addressed with the FBI, NSA, Homeland Security, his University Police force, and the student in a private setting........or........he is a nutjob that thinks the FBI is some secret front for foreign operatives seeking to do harm in his classroom, in which case he should have addressed it with his University Police force, the local news, and the student in a private setting.

The University Police force is entirely motivated by protecting their University. They would investigate and they would not be influenced by a nefarious top secret international plan.

If the other students had been called to action and pounced and killed this kid in fear of their own lives, they would have been justified, and the Professor would be in prison!

If this public display kills this kids academic career, he will probably wind up with an honorary degree and an apology from the University, so the professor's intentions would have entirely backfired!

All in all, this seems to be a very interesting story and I look forward to seeing it play out, but the Professor certainly acted inappropriately, regardless if his suspicions are well-founded or not.

[edit on 4-2-2010 by getreadyalready]



reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 05:07 PM by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by searching4truth
Originally posted by captaintyinknots

1)The Prof identified specific actions, and claims to have evidence of the 'student' in question attempting to recruit and organize a violent protest, including teaching people how to make molative coctails in 69 different ways.

2)There was no rant. It was a calm, informative approach.

3)I dont beliieve he works for the FBI. FBI agents tend to be smarter than going around openly recruiting.

4)This is the second time this has happened to the prof.

5)There will supposedly be 2 years worth of investigation released by Hall before this is over. A 2 year investigation tells me that he found enough to keep investigating.


I saw that the article stated that once the investigation is complete he will be teaching, but that he is not suspended. I'm confused as to how that lines up with a 2 year investigation, I didn't read that. So, is there a militia movement in Portland? So is he on some other type of leave? It's sad that he has to stay at other's homes during this time. Do you who this guy was then (the supposed fbi or not guy)? What was he recruiting for?


1)He is removed from teaching indefinitely, bt not suspended.

2)The 2 year investigation is new info. not sure yet what it will say.

3)There is a bit of militia in Portland, but this is something different.

4)As of yet, I do not have any other info on the 'student', other than that he is Ex-mossad, brags about weapons knowledge, and has tried to recruit.

Best guess is that he works for a contractor.


reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 05:14 PM by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by getreadyalready
1. I have many FBI friends, and they are investigators. Nothing more, nothing less. The furthest possible extent of a conspiracy connected to the FBI would be a lack of investigation (9/11, Kennedy, etc.). FBI agents are not recruiting or going anywhere incognito, or planning any violence, unless the said violence is a secret hope that some scumbag resists arrest!

2. Universities are indeed full of foreign nationals, fringe groups, and recruiters of all kinds. In my 10 years at this university I have personally witnessed people being recruited to do violence, sex, pornography, foreign service, CIA, military, corporate espionage, and probably 100 other things that I have already forgotten about!

3. The professor is an idiot for handling something this way. Either he has legitimate concerns which should have been addressed with the FBI, NSA, Homeland Security, his University Police force, and the student in a private setting........or........he is a nutjob that thinks the FBI is some secret front for foreign operatives seeking to do harm in his classroom, in which case he should have addressed it with his University Police force, the local news, and the student in a private setting.

The University Police force is entirely motivated by protecting their University. They would investigate and they would not be influenced by an nefarious top secret plan.

If the other students had been called to action and pounced and killed this kid in fear of their own lives, they would have been justified, and the Professor would be in prison!

If this public display kills this kids academic career, he will probably wind up with an honarary degree and an apology from the University, so the professor's intentions would have entirely backfired!

All in all, this seems to be a very interesting story and I look forward to seeing it play out, but the Professor certainly acted inappropriately, regardless if his suspicions are well-founded or not.


1) Again, I and most involved do not believe him to be FBI.
2)The reason the Prof handled it as he did was so that there would be at least SOME public knowledge of the event. The man is scared for his life, and wanted witnesses.
3)You ought to meet Prof Hall, before you claim him to be a nutjob. Anyone who has met him knows him to be a brilliant, well informed man.
4)The Prof stated he brought this to public view because the 'student' in question(who was not registered at the school initially) had moved from trying to recruit him(the prof) to trying to recruit students, which was, in his words, "over the line".


reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 05:23 PM by getreadyalready
reply to post by captaintyinknots



I wasn't calling him a nutjob. I only stated that either he believed the threat to be real enough to take real action, or he was just a nutjob throwing out a bunch of accusations for shock appeal.

If he believed the threat to be real, why didn't he get some form of police force involved? Maybe he distrusts the FBI, but I know my University Police Chief, this is a very large University, and the vast majority of people associated with it would trust the University Police to take any threat seriously and act in the appropriate manor.

If the professor was implying that the FBI is using this kid as an informant (i.e. working for the FBI), then any recruiting the kid does would be to identify potential terrorists on campus for the FBI to investigate. I would think that would be a good thing?

If the professor thinks this kid is bringing a weapon to campus, that is surely a violation of local law, and any of a number of local police forces could have handled it.

If the professor was "recruited" by the kid, then he should have contacted the FBI immediately at that point.

If the kid is openly "recruiting" in class, then he is violating a number of academic honor codes and he should have been removed from the classroom and/or University?

He may be an honest man, but from what I have read thus far, he is not "brilliant" in dealing with what he believes to be a dangerous situation.


reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 05:24 PM by captaintyinknots
reply to post by getreadyalready



I suppose you would have to have a little more of the info to understand the full picture then.



reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 05:31 PM by ProfEmeritus
I checked Prof. Hall's student ratings, and they are quite good. The students like him, and have rated him as a very good to excellent professor. There doesn't seem to be any major problems with students rating him with any odd behavior. For those that are interested, here is the link to his ratings from his students:

www.ratemyprofessors.com...

Here is a typical student rating for him:

I love Professor Hall. I took his Marxist Political Economy and History of Economic Thought courses. These courses are not extremely difficult if you pay attention and ask him for help. He is an all-around awesome guy with a great sense of humor and passion for teaching. Well-educated.

edited to add student comment

[edit on 4-2-2010 by ProfEmeritus]


reply posted on 4-2-2010 @ 05:36 PM by getreadyalready
reply to post by muzzleflash



Here again. If he is some ex-Sniper, ex-Mossad, recruiting agent, what are the chances that he would openly admit to any of that? He sounds like a wannabe.

If he is not a wannabe, then why did he file a complaint with the University and help this to all go public?

I am not a well-trained, well funded terrorist, but even I know that:

If I were actively recruiting militia in my University setting, I would never admit to it. I would never carry a weapon, insignia, or anything else to identify me. And, if someone threatened my operation, they would have an unfortunate vehicular accident or take a tumble down some stairs, or have a KCl induced heart-attack that would never look suspicious. Professors have heart-attacks all the time!

I have to agree that Portland is a vulnerable and attractive city for terrorists, but everything that everybody hears or "knows" is surely amateur hour! Amateurs can be dangerous, but they are typically fanatical loners, not Mossad or CIA trained operatives.

The real deal terrorists would not be involved in all this mess!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags