First of all, we'll get this out of the way, he's a terrible actor.

Secondly, he's in cahoots with Jaime Maussan, so that brought up the red flags in my book, already. But, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and checked the vid nonetheless.

Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence

Originally posted by MOTT the HOOPLE
The ATS rule of thumb " The amount of debunking is in direct proportion to amount of truthfulness of a story!"

Originally posted by Kandinsky

Originally posted by MOTT the HOOPLE
The ATS rule of thumb " The amount of debunking is in direct proportion to amount of truthfulness of a story!"

What? Do you mean 'truthiness?'

Is Dr. Jonathan Reed's (aka Billy Nomates/ Rutter) track history of pathological lying and pitiful attention-seeking really an indicator that his accounts are indeed true? It creates a paradox.

By telling a teacher his dog ate his homework...it meant that a parallel Reed really did do the homework and a dog he never owned ate it!? Either that or Reed's just a liar and there's no proportion, inverse or otherwise, that relates to his truthfulness.

Originally posted by bananasam
I don't really care if this is real or not, because from the video evidence, it still proves nothing other than that it messed up the camera. big deal, EMP effects have been around for ages.

there's still nothing that can validate that it is alien.