It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
First of all, we'll get this out of the way, he's a terrible actor.
Secondly, he's in cahoots with Jaime Maussan, so that brought up the red flags in my book, already. But, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and checked the vid nonetheless.
Anyway, just wanted to share this one with you guys, and let you know I think this guy's a total fake (as most of you already do, considering the amount of 'hoax' threads I saw).
Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence! You should join the dots and think out of the box. You can't prove that Reed is a hoax. You're a disinfo agent working for counter intelligence to propagate the ideas of TPTB. Just another illuminati shill trading his future for Nibiru dollars.
Tell me...who'll feed your kids when we're all overrun with 9 feet tall reptiles and the Pope is running this world?
Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by Kandinsky
Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence! You should join the dots and think out of the box. You can't prove that Reed is a hoax. You're a disinfo agent working for counter intelligence to propagate the ideas of TPTB. Just another illuminati shill trading his future for Nibiru dollars.
Tell me...who'll feed your kids when we're all overrun with 9 feet tall reptiles and the Pope is running this world?
You got him there....LOL!!
Just wow. I think you could do a pretty good comic book series with some of the ideas you've got there...
Originally posted by MOTT the HOOPLE
The ATS rule of thumb " The amount of debunking is in direct proportion to amount of truthfulness of a story!"
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Originally posted by MOTT the HOOPLE
The ATS rule of thumb " The amount of debunking is in direct proportion to amount of truthfulness of a story!"
What? Do you mean 'truthiness?'
Is Dr. Jonathan Reed's (aka Billy Nomates/ Rutter) track history of pathological lying and pitiful attention-seeking really an indicator that his accounts are indeed true? It creates a paradox.
By telling a teacher his dog ate his homework...it meant that a parallel Reed really did do the homework and a dog he never owned ate it!? Either that or Reed's just a liar and there's no proportion, inverse or otherwise, that relates to his truthfulness.
Originally posted by bananasam
I don't really care if this is real or not, because from the video evidence, it still proves nothing other than that it messed up the camera. big deal, EMP effects have been around for ages.
there's still nothing that can validate that it is alien.
Originally posted by NightVision
I know this is going to sound like a silly question, but if the vid is indeed a hoax, can
someone show me a similar demonstration or a duplicate of the FX used in that video?