It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lingerie line for kids to be launched

page: 15
48
<< 12  13  14    16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 07:05 AM
link   
reply to post by factbeforefiction
 

Factbeforefiction is absolutely correct!!!!!!!!!!!



It says "Most Fathers do not have custody." - that is the point - so go back to your encyclopedia and look up how many of those single parent families is headed by a 'Mother'. Mother being the trashy low life slut that purchases this crap and provides the market for it. Fathers do not purchase this crap and advertisers do not attempt to advertise this crap to Fathers. It's 100% square being sold to and bought by low life whore Mothers.


My son when he has custody dresses my grand daughter very carefully. Her mother isn't as "careful". While "mom" doesn't dress my sweetie like a slut, the short short short jeans were a little unnerving for me


Women are soooooooooo affected by advertising, they just won't admit it.

Do men

Pluck and arch their eyebrows?
Spend 45 minutes on their hair?
Put on eyeshadow, lipstick, eyeliner and mascara
curl thier eyelashes
put on perfume
floss
wear nail and toenail polish (I know Ozzy does but I'm talking normal men)
tight high heels
girdles
bras
shave your chin and around mouth (when you get older)
shave your legs

My husband gets ready for work in 15 minutes.

Me, because I have to "look a certain way" spend 1-1/2 hours getting ready just to be "socially acceptable"



[edit on 4-2-2010 by ofhumandescent]



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 08:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons
And someone who isn't titilated by it sees only boots and a pink dress and a little girl.


Your argument is absurdly specious. For instance, certainly a gay man can recognize the sexual and provocative nature of a female model or a centerfold and still not be attracted to her. Recognition is not attraction.


Your comments only serve to intimidate decent people who may speak out against the inappropriate nature of the images in a civilized society that cares for its children.

We have to draw a line somewhere otherwise our culture will commit suicide by first amendment.

[edit on 4/2/2010 by kosmicjack]



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Perseus Apex
 


LOL I know eh... I find it funny that some people are saying "its not that bad its just kids playing dress up..." How many of you remember dressing as a cowboy or a soldier when you were young??? DAMN HOW HARD didn't you believe you were that cowboy or soldier??? you don't need much in a child's mind for having one thing lead to another...

On second hand this WILL kick half of this world's pedophiles in second gear... Its simply just asking for it...

wanna see even more disturbing people... go there... they are all disturbing by im especially pointing out #3

www.cracked.com...



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 09:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Raist
I knew stripers that would not have dressed their own girls in this sort of attire.


I completely agree!
Actually there's someone at my work that used to be a stripper to pay for her education and she dresses pretty revealing even today.

I showed her the pics and she got mad at me for showing it to her.
She said what kind of sick people wouldn't be bothered by this.

I asked her as soon as I read your post and your completely correct



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 10:09 AM
link   
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


Nothing personal towards you but it burns me up when I hear about strippers doing that crap so they can get through school. What a cop out. As if that is supposed to make it decent and acceptable.



[edit on 4-2-2010 by Bombeni]



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 10:49 AM
link   
According to CNBC the actual owner of the company is saying the story is a hoax and completely false. The writer of the MSNBC story is blaming Perez Hilton for starting the rumor.
CNBC declares the story false.
I apologize if this has been posted but I couldn't wade through 15 pages of diatribe.



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 11:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Bombeni
 



1st`ly im completely against any kind of adult style underware for girls. Children are growing up too fast these days, and thier innosence is lost far too early.

But the reason im replying to your quote is your comment on strippers. In life there are some disgusting things that occur. But for you to think that strippers cause sex attacks is just so nieve. These beasts that attack women, dont go and attack a woman because he`s seen a strip show, he goes and does it because he is a sick individual. I think that in fact, strippers, prostitutes and adult mags/movies ect, help tp keep the rate of attacts down. If these men didnt have that relese they then might go on to attack a woman...



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Sad to say that this should come as no big surprise. Her big sis is Mylie, the 16 year old pole dancer! I'm scared to think what this child will grow up to be like



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 11:50 AM
link   
This stuff is just really tacky dress up clothes with a lot of sewed on accessories and ruffles.

Little girls love to dress up like mommy and play with make up.

This stuff is far from lingerie, it looks more like a circus clown’s outfit.

I can't imagine a parent let their daughters going out in the stuff, but hey...it's a free world.



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 12:00 PM
link   
reply to post by dalan.
 


I cant belive what iv just read...
Now its socioties fault that these disgusting pedophiles exist now is it...
Ever thought its just because they`r sick twisted mind isn`t content wit an adult relatioship. They`v got the disgusting urge to control these poor defencless children...
IMO these monsters are ONLY happy wit adult-child relationship, the way any normal person IS ONLY happy wit an adult-adult relationship. There`s no rehabilitation, no healing or mending these pigs. Its as natural to them as breathing air. They should never be allowed any kind of human rights treatment because they`re inhuman, and do inhumain things...

They should never be given any kind of understanding or compassion...
They didnt give thier victim any...




posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 01:09 PM
link   
The gay man who isn't totally gay though and has issues with it becomes enraged at the provactation. The gay man that has no feelings of provocation, or whom is comfortable in sexuality regardless does not become enraged.

What these guys are engaging in is a form of projection. One that should not be encouraged, because their instinct is to get rid of or control the things that cause them mental or moral issues because they are encapable of owning their own problem.

The language of these men is consistent with my evaluation, and their consistent confabulation with nine year olds as hookers, sluts, and being sexier than the adult women around them proves it out.

Then they make excuses for it by trying to draw other men into the flock with them - well of course it makes me think this, I'm a MAN. If I were a man I'd be freaking disgusted with these guys trying to put me into the same category with them. And I assure you, I've shared threads like this with male friends and they do find it repellent to be grouped this way with a guy who excuses himself for sexual thoughts about vixen nine year olds because he's a "guy" and cannot help himself when he sees certain clothing.

Men like nice clothing on nice looking women. Men do not suddenly have thoughts about how a nine year old is sexier than his wife because men are not attracted to nine year olds - in any state of dress.

You feel free to be accepting of this behaviour. In doing so, you'd eventually find that the person who expresses what these guys are expressing are not safe people to leave your children around.


Originally posted by kosmicjack

Originally posted by Aeons
And someone who isn't titilated by it sees only boots and a pink dress and a little girl.


Your argument is absurdly specious. For instance, certainly a gay man can recognize the sexual and provocative nature of a female model or a centerfold and still not be attracted to her. Recognition is not attraction.


Your comments only serve to intimidate decent people who may speak out against the inappropriate nature of the images in a civilized society that cares for its children.

We have to draw a line somewhere otherwise our culture will commit suicide by first amendment.

[edit on 2010/2/4 by Aeons]



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 01:13 PM
link   
What a load of horse #.

Sexy girls MAKE men crazy, and therefore CAUSE those men to act like beasts.

I think I've heard this argument before.

Every decent male should be offended, and every woman should take care in your presence.


Originally posted by Bombeni
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


Nothing personal towards you but it burns me up when I hear about strippers doing that crap so they can get through school. What a cop out. As if that is supposed to make it decent and acceptable.

Strippers are as much of what drives sex abuse of females as anything.



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 01:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by djvexd
According to CNBC the actual owner of the company is saying the story is a hoax and completely false. The writer of the MSNBC story is blaming Perez Hilton for starting the rumor.
CNBC declares the story false.
I apologize if this has been posted but I couldn't wade through 15 pages of diatribe.


I don't know if this specific reference has been posted, but several of us have pointed out that the article cited in the OP is totally misleading, does not show any of the clothing from this new line of girl's dresses (not lingerie, not underwear), and is designed only for sensationalist purposes.

But it's worth resaying at least once every page or so, just in case a few people will still be thinking clearly enough to check the real story out instead of just jumping on a chance at moral outrage and righteous indignation fueled by a celebrity blogger.



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 02:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by superdebz
Welcome to the world of the disney slut -_-"
I bet if walt disney saw this # hed roll around in his grave


i thought he was a pedophile?

just kidding



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 02:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo

Lingerie line for kids to be launched


celebrities.ninemsn.com.au

Miley's 9-year-old sister launching a lingerie line for kids

Seems like every time we hear about Noah Cyrus she's doing something totally innapropriate for her age.

Whether it's dressing like a dominatrix for Halloween, skipping around a pole-dancing pole or performing the totally un-PG hits 'Smack That' and 'Tik Tok', we suspect this nine-year-old could easily notch up more scandals than her big sis by the time she hits her teens.
(visit the link for the full news article)



America is void of morality. It is a sick nation and has already fallen as any sort of moral authority.

Toddlers and Tiaras, a tv show that is bordering on kiddie porn is sickening to watch. The fact that these behaviours are encouraged and nurtured even by celebrities whose lifestyles are coveted and imitated by many a person in the USA and elsewhere for that matter is very sad indeed.

This type of behaviour from media nepotism and clearly close controlled distribution system are further evidence of the continued crumbling of America.

From a far shore, it is unfortunate to watch her burn this way.



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 03:53 PM
link   
Another trashy business venture courtesy of the Cyrus clan.

What a surprise.


[edit on 4-2-2010 by Orion65]



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 06:34 PM
link   
this topic realy sickens me it is sad that little girls have to dress sexy just to get some attention, but who can realy blame them wen they are preshirerd by the media to grow up fast and when all they hear is big girl this and when your a big girl you can do this and that, its so un fair on them because they are wasting there chiledhood wishing that they were older insted of enjoing it while they are young and that lass i feal realy sorry for her because her older sister is world famous and shes like how do i become her? she should change her role model to some one that isent her older sister beacaus its her sister thats making her this way



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 08:29 PM
link   
Pedophiles around the world may now rejoice. This just further proves that nothing is safe from the evil will of money.



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 08:35 PM
link   
I feel sorry for Annie Dugourd. If she is telling the truth the whole thing was a lie. I encourage the posters up to this point to check out the link mentioned earlier. Now does this put the whole thing in the hoax category or what? Unfortunately the two ladies who own the clothing company have been maligned and they deserve better. Now that I have found out the truth I wish to retract anything bad I said about their company if indeed I did so.



posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 09:45 PM
link   
reply to post by djvexd
 


It's too bad most people are not going to see this. I made no comment on the clothing line itself because what i saw linked wasn't bad. The link in the OP was pretty damn bad though. The whole 10 year old and stripper pole thing freaked me out.

This isn't the first time Hilton has mislead people though. His tactics have gotten him punched in the face a few times.




top topics



 
48
<< 12  13  14    16  17 >>

log in

join