Lingerie line for kids to be launched

I am surprised at the people saying that the clothes are not that bad. All I know is I would never, ever let my daughter dress like that.

The other thing that bugs me about this is how the article says A 9 year old is launching a lingerie line. 9 year olds don't launch lines or companys. Just because her name is being stuck on it doesn't mean she's behind it. A 9 year old doesn't do anything there parents don't let or make them do. Billy Ray and whoever he is letting run his daughters career and life (manager whoever) are the messed up ones here.

One more thing I want to point out.. Maybe some will agree and some won't, but in the end it is my opinion..

THIS IS NOT FASHION!!

Mini skirts, skin-tight clothes, lingerie, makeup, and even some jewelery is actually used to attract the other sex "sexually" using "sexually attractive body parts"..

Why would a 9 year old wear a mini-skirt and show her hips like that?
Does she intend to "attract the opposite sex" by showing more meat? (heck, I even feel disgusted writing this!)

Why would a 9 year old wear lipstick?
Does she intend to attract the opposite sex "by attractive lips asking to be kissed"??

This has nothing to do with fashion!!
These clothes are not fashionable, THEY ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE!!

A 9 year old should be wearing jeans or a knee-level skirt outside with suiting shirt/jacket, and a pajama with a unicorn textures at home.. (Seriously, I love unicorns)

At 9 years old: "Mooooom, I want that Miley's-sister's-dress!! But, Mooooom!!" , and a few years later...highschool or college... same girl goes back home one night crying/shocked/disturbed "I got raped at a party/the dorm/the club" as if they had nothing to do with it!

I really don't know what else to think or say, THIS HAS TO STOP!!

I would just like to make the argument that this thread is a sociologist's dream. Many posters here have remarked that little girls wearing clothing like this will breed more pedophiles, but I would like to argue against such assertions.

Richard Krafft-Ebing was the first scientist to use the concept/term of pedophile to describe an "adults love of a child." Of course "love" meaning something sexual in nature...

and that was in 1886.

Pedophiles, I believe, are created by the societies that they live in. Its no small wonder that the most sexually conservative cultures produce the most pedophiles. When sexuality is restricted, punished, chastised, and used in such a way to make people feel like lesser individuals...or dirty, nasty, rotten people; then psychological fixations are likely to result.

The very attitudes of the people on this thread who proclaim that the more "skin"children show can only lead to more pedophiles, are the very attitudes that create pedophiles.

What are the pedophile rates for nudist colonies?

That would be an interesting set of data to have.

The only thing that this thread has shown me is that many people have deep, sexual-based issues. Imagine if trees felt guilt or shame because they had leaves...

That is the basic attitude of humanity towards sexuality, and it is that attitude that gives birth to "sexual deviants."

Anyone who thinks this is OK really needs to think, "would I be happy for my little girl to be wearing this?"

I think whether it's lingerie or not, it's still disgraceful for any girl under the Legal Age for sex to be wearing these kinds of clothes.

Little girls are being shown that it's OK to be dressed like a "whore" or a "horny wife".

they might as well bring out little girls play drugs and sex toys while there at it.

SICK.

This is the dumbest, sickest thing I have seen in a long time. Whoever is pushing this needs to check into a psychiatric institution

reply to post by shakespear1


or even better be put in jail for selling child pornografy paraphernalia

reply to post by Solomons

If there was no demand for this sort of thing it wouldn't be available, and since their is demand we should acknowledge the fact that many parents are quite happy and willing to buy this for their children.

Who says there's a demand for this? I'm not saying there won't be idiots who will buy it for their girls, but why do you think consumers are requesting or demanding it? I think many times we're led to believe we as consumers are asking for this kind of crap simply as a marketing ploy to coerce us into buying it...and it usually works!

****

This new revelation about Noah isn't hugely surprising if you consider the concept of her sister, Mylie's show:

There's nothing wrong with being materialistic

It's okay to act like the world revolves around you and only you

If your parents tell you you can't do something, go to any extreme to do it anyway

Acting on all of your jealous impulses is cute and funny

And the premise of the show, "have your daughter lead a double life so that her everyday life remains 'normal'" is flawed all the way around. Billy Ray and the other adults responsible for these girls seem more and more like they could care less about the consequences as long as the cash flow is coming in. How sick.

people are always attacked for using the r word lately

but damn theres no other word for it our country is freaking retarded

one week, a law makes the rounds thats makes kids who sext felons

now, we launch a multimillion dollar line of lingerie for kids


we are some serious hypocritical retarded asses plain and simple


we wonder why our kids and our country are screwed up yet every 2 seconds everything we do contradicts something we just did or are about to do


god we're screwed if einstein and tesla arent brought back from the dead soon, we really need some geniuses around here, stat (to borrow a word from one of americas favorite pasttimes, doctor shows)

Originally posted by dalan.
I would just like to make the argument that this thread is a sociologist's dream. Many posters here have remarked that little girls wearing clothing like this will breed more pedophiles, but I would like to argue against such assertions.

Richard Krafft-Ebing was the first scientist to use the concept/term of pedophile to describe an "adults love of a child." Of course "love" meaning something sexual in nature...

and that was in 1886.

Pedophiles, I believe, are created by the societies that they live in. Its no small wonder that the most sexually conservative cultures produce the most pedophiles. When sexuality is restricted, punished, chastised, and used in such a way to make people feel like lesser individuals...or dirty, nasty, rotten people; then psychological fixations are likely to result.

The very attitudes of the people on this thread who proclaim that the more "skin"children show can only lead to more pedophiles, are the very attitudes that create pedophiles.

What are the pedophile rates for nudist colonies?

That would be an interesting set of data to have.

The only thing that this thread has shown me is that many people have deep, sexual-based issues. Imagine if trees felt guilt or shame because they had leaves...

That is the basic attitude of humanity towards sexuality, and it is that attitude that gives birth to "sexual deviants."

no it creates more pedophiles by definition of the law

because now, sexting, makes you a pedophile

childrens lingerie, will bring kids into sexual "maturity" quicker, which will have many more kids sexting, which will make many more convicted sex offenders, and im sure since the material involves underage kids, when those convicted turn 18, they will be considered pedophiles

reply to post by dalan.

I would just like to make the argument that this thread is a sociologist's dream. Many posters here have remarked that little girls wearing clothing like this will breed more pedophiles

I haven't read every post in here yet, so I don't know if anyone actually said this type of thing "breeds" pedophiles. I don't think this stuff can "breed" a pedophile. A pedophile doesn't just start being a pedophile because he runs across a picture of a little girl in fishnet stockings. Usually their actions are a result of their own experiences as a predator's victim. However, this kind of thing can certainly do well to encourage the millions of pedophiles we already have--and why should we contribute to that?

It's true that you will find many happy, stable families who live the nudist lifestyle. They definitely don't have the obsession most others do when it comes to imperfections in the human body, and it's not a community of naked people having open sex all over the place as some seem to believe. But don't think the nudist communities don't have their own pedophiles lurking in their midst. It's the perfect environment for someone with a penchant for children to try to infiltrate.

You view the protesting comments in this thread as being from sexually oppressed people who are reacting as are due to their own hang ups. That may be true in some cases. However, many others probably see this as the sexual exploitation of little girls, who more than likely are too young to understand the implied subject matter of the products they are promoting.

Little girls, I believe, would prefer playing dolls with their friends as opposed to creating a lingerie line. I wonder what Noah prefers to be doing. This doesn't sound like a scheme hatched by a little girl, IMO.

reply to post by ModernAcademia


You and me both. It is just so wrong on so many levels. I'm glad I'm not ever going to be seeing my neice wearing this crap as my brother has a level head. Further down the hole we go...

reply to post by Dramey


Dramey,

LOL your first comment with respect to the country being "retarded." However, I think your going to run into problems substantiating this one:

no it creates more pedophiles by definition of the law because now, sexting, makes you a pedophile childrens lingerie, will bring kids into sexual "maturity" quicker, which will have many more kids sexting, which will make many more convicted sex offenders, and im sure since the material involves underage kids, when those convicted turn 18, they will be considered pedophiles

OP is Flagged for this interesting and controversial find of a topic.

I think 100% of responsibility for this garbage existing is the parents. It amazes me how parents let their kids drag them around stores like a pet to buy and support this garbage. I guess everyone should make materialism and fashion their new god wasn't Walt Disney a Freemason.

I also remember dressing up as a child to look more grown up, i am pretty sure its more common than not for kids to do..But, that said, i can't simply say thats the case with this line of items..and as another member stated, its gift wrapping for pedos really.. yes, to be a pedophile in the first place is a deep rooted psychological issue with the individual, but this type of stuff doesnt help anything! Its wrong and evil for men to have thoughts of underaged girls, but the same underaged girls are going out in public plastered in makeup, tight fitting clothes of obvious intentional nature and so forth.. between media, kids entertainment on television, parental ignorance and the chemicals in food items (growth hormones in milk for example), children don't seem to have much of a childhood at all anymore..why its being pushed is unclear, but it certainly does seem to be being pushed in many directions. Dressing up in ones home where its a safe enviroment is one thing, and doing so to go to the local shops is a complete other!

All cultures have a "flavor". America's flavor is a mixture of insane urban ghetto Rush Street Whore. We're at one end of the spectrum and the Middle East is at the other, where they still dress like their ancestors did 4,000 years ago.

I've sat back, watched and wonder how anyone could take their beautiful, sweet little daughter, sister or grand daughter and like riley said "gift wrap them for a sexual predator".

It started years back with "beauty pageants". Look at Jonbenet Ramsey. What is anybody thinking taking a five year old and dressing them up and teaching them to walk like a 20 year old?

Did we ever really find out who killed Jonbenet? My guess, can you say ritual sacrifice.

Disney...............read Thanks for the Memories by Brice Taylor (page 57).

Now, start researching how many children go missing, totally missing and not by "the other parent".

This is a big conspiracy but nobody seems to be able to really want to see how deep this rabbit hole goes with it's many twists and turns.

Tatoos (A mark of slavery/ownership), nose buttons, tongue bolts, shirts that don't cover your navel, jeans/pants that expose your butt crack when you "scrunch down" If you dear reader dress like any of the above you have bought into this (brown word).

Now it's progressed to the babies. Children who are just out of diapers. Children will do as they see not what they are taught. WE ALL set the example.

It's not just the parents. If you're a parent you know kids don't listen to you, it's the "older girls" and Hollywood promoting this frap and frap it is, urban, slutty, no class and no brains flavor of America.

If you all would just stand back and watch the progression of "fashion" just over the past 20 years. The "slut" look started with Madonna back in the 80's (Madonna is suppose to be another mind control victim).

A great deal that is coming out of Hollywood is linked to mind control in some fashion. Some of the hottest entertainers are Monarch slaves, such as Madonna, a Marilyn Monroe replacement. Co-author Fritz was given a catalog to Vidimax, which is an New Jersey occult porn video club by someone wanting to help his research. This cult video club sells actually snuff films. They sell the real life footage of cannibalism, virgin sacrifices, occult rituals, and worse. When Madonna was a teenage slave with the name Louise Chiccone living in NY East Village, a real life film was made of her being raped (a setup), and then her cult family taking the rapist and sacrificing him. Vidimax sells this for $19 to their members. Some of their videos are live footage of how kidnapped people have been tortured into becoming slaves. One of the catalog listing says, "tortured until their wills are broken and they become Olga’s submissive slaves!...WARNING EXTREME GRAPHIC VIOLENCE...BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND." The Illuminati Formula 12. External Controls

How the Disney movies are used as programming scripts is very involved so only one detailed example is given at the end of this chapter. The Illuminati and Mafia knew that Walt had the ability to get the job done that the Great Plans called for.Chapter 5. Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula by Fritz Springmeier & Cisco Wheeler

In 1934, Walt Disney made a cartoon about a goddess of the Mystery Religions named Persephone. In the cartoon entitled The Goddess of Spring, the goddess Persephone is captured by Satan as his bride and sent to the underworld, with the agreement she could return to earth six months of each year. The Illuminati have rituals around Persephone. On Dec. 21, 1937, Disney premiered the first full-length color cartoon movie "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs." This cartoon had taken $1.4 in depression-time money and three years to make. Over 750 artists worked on the film. Walt Disney had gotten the idea from a silent movie of Snow White which he saw as a boy in 1917. The movie has an important occult theme to it, and has been used for occult mind-control programming. Chapter 5. Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula by Fritz Springmeier & Cisco Wheeler

www.whale.to...

The link above is a very interesting site.

"It" is all around you, not just with Noah and Miley Cyrus (very strange names).

You breath it in everyday, but up until it smacks you in the face have never realized how prevalent "it" is.

www.youtube.com...

Start researching on your own and you will find how deeply we are all being controlled. The fifty million dollar question folks is by who?

Miley & Noah Cyrus
Madonna
Britney Spears
Justin Timberlake
Christina Aguilera
Lindsey Lohan
Nick Carter
Aaron Carter
Kurt Cobain
Courtney Love
Michael Jackson
Janet Jackson
Will Smith
Jada Pinkett-Smith
Mariah Carey
Anna-Nicole Smith
Beyonce Knowles
Rhianna
Jay-Z
The Olson Twins
Jodie Foster
Marilyn Monroe
Kate Moss
Heath Ledger
Christina Aguilera
Beyonce

"When looking for evidence of progamming, simply look at the images being shown and dissect the dialogue and monitor the hand jestures. Background images and camera angles are deliberate and trigger codes are coded into the script, observe."

If you read "TFTM" the above list give all the earmarks of being "controlled".

Many people laugh at David Icke and his books, but he has connected more of the dots than almost anyone else.

Staggering as it may seem, all of the above are massively widespread all over the world. It is happening in your community now, I don't care where you are. I, and others, have been highlighting this for years and now, as you will see on this site, the scale of it, and the famous people involved, are coming to light at last.

Partly these rituals and abuse networks are to do with traumatizing people, especially children, but it is far more than just that. Follow the Illuminati-reptilian bloodlines from the ancient world to now and they have ALWAYS taken part in human sacrifice ceremonies and blood-drinking. The sacrifices to "the gods" in the ancient accounts were literally sacrifices to the reptilians and their hybrid bloodines. The story of the blood-drinking Dracula is symbolic of these reptilian "vampires". One of the locations of this reptilian group would appear to be the star-system known as Draco and "draconian" certainly sums up the Illuminati.

To hold their human form, these entities need to drink human (mammalian) blood and access the energy it contains to maintain their DNA codes in their "human" expression. If they don't, they manifest their reptilian codes and we would all see what they really look like. "Oh, my God, Mr. President, do you always eat your breakfast from across the room?".

From what I understand from former "insiders", the blood (energy) of babies and small children is the most effective for this, as are blond-haired, blue-eyed people. Hence these are the ones overwhelmingly used in sacrifice, as are red- haired people also, it appears.

This is why people like George Bush, Henry Kissinger, and a stream of the other Illuminati "big names" are exposed in my books and on this site as reptilian shape-shifters who take part in human sacrifice and blood drinking. The two go together. There also appears to be a very significant emphasis among the Illuminati-reptilians and their offshoots with paedophilia, which is rampant on this planet.

I trust this brief summary will help you to see the relevance of all the articles and information you will find on this site. In the end all these apparently unconnected "conspiracies" are part of ONE conspiracy designed to introduce ONE agenda. The reptilian control of Planet Earth and its entire population.

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

Children should not have lingerie, they should have underwear.


[edit on 4-2-2010 by ofhumandescent]

reply to post by dalan.


Very good and insightful post. However, and this is a big however, many of the programs I am seeing with little girls (under 12) are dressing way too sexual.

If you dress sexual many "normal" men will hit on you, it's not just pedophiles.

I did not dress sexual at 10, however, I was 36B 22 34 and began menstrating at 10 - I was very well developed as a child. Even though I dressed modestly, it was evident I was beginning to be a sexual being. That is the key word here.

Dressing a little girl up like a "woman" is the same as having a really well developed "child". The only difference is one is artifical (man made "fashion" and the other "natural". Either way it is a unconscious signal for inviting sexual activity to begin. This is natures way.

Most people have no idea what it is like to be 10 with the body of a "woman".

If you dress a child up like a adult you are asking for trouble.

Bottom line, if you want your daughter, niece, grand daughter to become sexually active at a young age, then by all means get her that ruby navel ring, pants that show her butt crack when she scrunches down, high cut shirt, lipstick, dark finger / toe nail polish and all the rest of it.

I see young girls all the time dressed like Rush Street Whores, and they are inviting trouble. I did not invite trouble, just being "developed" caused a lot of problems for me.

Many normal men will get an erection just seeing a pretty young provocativily dressed child. I 'm sorry but that is the nature of the beast.

Why can't we just let our children be children?

We hand them over to strangers when they are barely born, so we can work 9-5.

Most are keylatch kids, home alone - when they should be supervised.

They are exposed to tons of frap on the boob tube, pressured to be "just like Miley" and all the rest of it.

Our children, our legacy are being left to fend for themselves in a world gone mad.

When will people wake up and cease the insanity.

Sorry, I just don't buy it. I am a survivor of sexual abuse and not just one man, several (2 family members, dentist & teacher).

Men cannot help it, it is in their nature to get hard when they see a woman "fixed up". When a little girl tries to look like she is 20 that is a open invitation for sex.

If you weighed 200 pounds, and were constantly on a diet, trying to watch your calorie intake and loved the taste, smell and feel of food and I sat next to you each day with a piece of the best cheese cake and pizza wouldn't you feel "teased", could you withstand the tempation?

Humans are meant to be sexual creatures, it is one of our top survival drives......

Dressing a child up like an adult is inviting trouble.

I'm not saying to wear a hajib but there is the other end of the scale too.

Moderation is the key word here.

Going one end or the other in extremes is dangerous.

I know many think this is contributing to the corruption of the youth, but

it is really not too different from Halloween costumes or little princess dresses, and

I think somebody might be trying to reverse the declining birth rate.

reply to post by ofhumandescent


Absolutely agree on most of what you just said, the mind control does run deep and the list of names given are certainly at the top of both being controlled themselves, and being used to control others.. the entire populace has, over decades now, been subject to predictive programming and mind control beyond belief.. I also agree and have researched to an extent the missing children cases world wide and the likely hood of them being victims of ritual sacrifices by the elite, not just some 'crazed satanist', but by influencial governmental and hollywood personas..
The only thing i do disagree with in the post is your reasonings for individuals getting body modifications such as piercings and tattoos.. yes they can be signs of control and ownership (for example, in the BDSM world) but originally started in tribes centuries upon centuries ago as status symbols, rites of passage, and for other various belief purposes..I personally got mine to ..in a way .. connect to the ancients who practiced body mods, but also to make an outward statement to sheeple that i am not one of them, without even having to speak to them.. (thankfully in many cases lol).. and in a way, it was a personal rite of passage ceremony since the only ones our society recognize these days are consumer directed (of age to buy cigarettes, alcohol, rated films etc) ..dont mean to gear off topic though. star for you in being very clued in!

reply to post by Zosynspiracy

I agree wholeheartedly with you. No wonder America has such a problem with pedophilia.

The US has no more of a problem with pedophilia than any other country, some Countries, like England, have just as big of a problem and appear to be more lax in its sentencing of offenders.
Just look at Pet Townsend of the "Who", who was caught using his credit card to buy a subscription to a child porn site and was given a very light sentence.

Apparently his defense was that he was doing "research" for a book on the subject.. right

As far as the pictures, I have more of a problem with the crap "makeup" thats packed on her face than i do with the clothing.
Except the dominatrix get up.

That poor girl looks horrible with all that make up. Anyone interest in seeing white trash evolve before your eyes, keep an eye on lil miss cyrus.